Husband v. Salt Lake City
Citation | 92 Utah 449,69 P.2d 491 |
Decision Date | 16 June 1937 |
Docket Number | 5800 |
Court | Supreme Court of Utah |
Parties | HUSBAND v. SALT LAKE CITY |
Rehearing Denied September 10, 1937.
Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; James W. McKinney, Judge.
Action by Dale Husband, a minor, by R. S. Husband, his guardian ad litem, against Salt Lake City. From a judgment dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.
AFFIRMED.
Shirley P. Jones, of Salt Lake City, for appellant.
Fisher Harris, City Atty., and E. R. Christensen and Gerald Irvine Asst. City Attys., and Hurd & Hurd, all of Salt Lake City for respondent.
OPINION
Plaintiff brought this action against Salt Lake City to recover for personal injuries sustained by him while he was in Pioneer Park, a park owned and managed by the city. The defendant filed a general demurrer to plaintiff's complaint. The lower court sustained the demurrer and, upon plaintiff failing to further plead, dismissed the complaint. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal and assigns as error the sustaining of said demurrer and the dismissal of plaintiff's complaint. Pertinent to the questions before us, the complaint alleges:
The claim presented to the city was verified and reads as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Davis v. Provo City Corporation
...held that a fireworks display was a nuisance. Speir v. City of Brooklyn, 139 N.Y. 6, 34 N.E. 727, 21 L.R.A. 641. In the case of Husband v. Salt Lake City, supra, Justice Hanson presented a definition of nuisance, which was not approved by the majority of the court, so broad as to include a ......
-
Standiford v. Salt Lake City Corp.
...them. See also separate opinions of Justice Wolfe in Lehi City v. Meiling, 87 Utah 237, 48 P.2d 530 (1935), and Husband v. Salt Lake City, 92 Utah 449, 69 P.2d 491 (1937). A majority of the United States Supreme Court in Indian Towing Co., Inc. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61, 76 S.Ct. 122, 1......
-
Niblock v. Salt Lake City
...... instruction to dismiss the complaint. . . It is. so ordered. Costs to appellant. . . CONCUR. BY: WOLFE. . . MOFFAT,. C. J., and LARSON and PRATT, JJ., concur. . . WOLFE,. Justice (concurring). . . I. concur. In the case of Husband v. Salt Lake. City, 92 Utah 449, 69 P.2d 491, I expressed the opinion. that municipal immunity for the negligence of its employees. had been extended too far. The doctrine cannot be defended in. any case on ethical grounds. The state should set the example. by responding in damages for injury ......
-
Driggs v. Utah Teachers Retirement Board
...... . . Justice. Wolfe in his concurring opinions in Husband v. Salt Lake City , 92 Utah 449, 69 P.2d 491, and. Niblock v. Salt ......