Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Company, 10 EAP 2006.
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania |
| Writing for the Court | Per Curiam |
| Citation | 922 A.2d 890 |
| Parties | H. Ryan HUTCHINSON, Appellant, v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY and Penske Corporation, Keystone Foods North America, Freightliner, L.L.C. and McDonald's Corporation, Appellees, H. Ryan Hutchinson, Appellant, v. Penske Truck Leasing Company and Penske Corporation and Freightliner, L.L.C., Appellees. |
| Docket Number | No. 10 EAP 2006.,No. 11 EAP 2006.,10 EAP 2006.,11 EAP 2006. |
| Decision Date | 31 May 2007 |
v.
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY and Penske Corporation, Keystone Foods North America, Freightliner, L.L.C. and McDonald's Corporation, Appellees,
H. Ryan Hutchinson, Appellant,
v.
Penske Truck Leasing Company and Penske Corporation and Freightliner, L.L.C., Appellees.
Appeal Nos. 10 EAP 2006, 11 EAP 2006 from the Judgment of Superior Court entered on 5/17/05 at No. 463 EDA 2004 (reargument denied on 7/21/05) remanding for a new trial the order entered on 2/9/04 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No. 3460 February Term 2001, Nitza I. Quinones Alejandro, J.
Appeal from the Judgment of Superior Court entered on 5/17/05 at No. 497 EDA 2004 (reargument denied on 7/21/05) remanding for a new trial the order entered on 2/9/04 in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No. 3460 February Term 2001.
Dean F. Murtagh, Esq., Christina J. Westall, Esq., German, Gallagher & Murtagh, P.C., Philadelphia, for amicus curiae Pennsylvania Defense Institute.
John S. Bagby, Jr., Esq., Bagby & Associates, Philadelphia, for H. Ryan Hutchinson.
David C. Harrison, Esq., Philadelphia, for amicus curiae Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association.
Nancy L. Winkelman, Esq., Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, L.L.P., Wilbur Bourne Ruthrauff, Esq., Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg, L.L.P., Philadelphia, for Freightliner, L.L.C.
Edward J. Tuite, Esq., Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, P.C., Philadelphia, for Penske Truck Leasing Company and Penske Corporation.
BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER and BALDWIN, JJ.
Prior Report: Pa.Super., 876 A.2d 978.
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 31st day of May, 2007, the order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
Former Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gaudio v. Ford Motor Co.
...conduct, that is on trial. See, e.g., Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., 876 A.2d 978, 983 (Pa.Super.2005), affirmed, 592 Pa. 38, 922 A.2d 890 ¶ 9 The crashworthiness doctrine is a subset of strict products liability law that most typically arises in the context of vehicular accidents.......
-
Walnut Street v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc., DOCKET NO. A-5501-06T2
...that controlled the outcome of the case. Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., 876 A.2d 978, 984 (Pa.Super.2005), affirmed, 592 Pa. 38, 922 A.2d 890 (2007). When, as here, the issue raised on appeal presents a question of law, our standard of review is de novo and our scope of review is p......
-
Valentino v. Phila. Triathlon, LLC, 3049 EDA 2013
...an award of punitive damages." Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co. , 876 A.2d 978, 983–984 (Pa. Super. 2005), aff'd , 592 Pa. 38, 922 A.2d 890 (2007).Appellant's amended complaint alleges that Mr. Valentino died while swimming in the Schuylkill River during the Triathlon. The amended com......
-
Carlino E. Brandywine, L.P. v. Brandywine Vill. Assocs., 1194 EDA 2019
...prejudice, bias or ill-will." Hutchinson v. Penske Truck Leasing Co. , 876 A.2d 978, 984 (Pa. Super. 2005), aff'd , 592 Pa. 38, 922 A.2d 890 (2007).Initially, we find it necessary to define the scope of Carlino's motion to compel because Carlino did not move to compel specific document requ......