Huyett v. Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company
| Decision Date | 01 July 1854 |
| Citation | 23 Pa. 373 |
| Parties | Huyett versus Philadelphia and Reading Railroad Company. |
| Court | Pennsylvania Supreme Court |
In the case of the Railroad Company v. Yeiser, all the material principles of this cause are decided except one; and that has reference to what is sufficient evidence of carelessness on the part of a railroad company in case of a fire occasioned by sparks from their engines.
Whether, in this instance, it was caused by the carelessness of the defendants' servants, must be judged from the circumstances; and we think that the cases referred to by the plaintiff's counsel, show clearly enough that this question, under the evidence here, is within the province of the jury: see also 1 Denio 91.
How is it possible for the Court to say, as matter of law, how many sparks, or how many fires caused by them, it takes to prove carelessness? How can the law declare, except as a deduction from facts found, what are sufficient spark-catchers? When we find fires started by a locomotive, at distances of 80 to 150 feet from the road, how can we say that that is no evidence of carelessness? It is a question of fact, whether the small sparks that escape through a good spark-catcher will ignite wood at such a distance. We see wooden houses, and lumber, and firewood, and shingles standing all along the very edge of railroads without being burnt; how can we say that the happening of several fires, all about the same time, along the line of the road, is no evidence of carelessness?
The company has paid for its right of way and for all the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Director General of Railroad v. Johnston
... ... prayer of defendant: ... "A ... railroad company is not bound to adopt any particular kind of ... appliances or machinery ... of the defendant below. Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v ... Schultz, 93 Pa. 341; Texas, etc., R. Co. v. Levi & ... One of ... the earliest cases on this point is Huyett v. Railroad ... Co., 23 Pa. 373. See Louisville & N. R. Co. v ... ...
-
Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Chi. & N. W. Ry. Co.
... ... Snow, Judge. Action by the Continental Insurance Company against the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. There ... Syllabus by the Court In an action against a railroad company for damages caused by fire from a locomotive, Gen ... Co. v. Bales, 16 Kan. 252; Philadelphia, etc., R. R. Co. v. Schulta, 93 Pa. 344;Jacksonville, etc., ... ...
-
McTavish v. Great Northern Railway Co.
... ... by John McTavish against the Great Northern Railway Company ... Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals ... judgment. Reading this entire document as a whole, we are ... clear that it ... trail running along the east side of the railroad track, and ... at a distance varying from 100 to 150 feet ... repeated fires. As early as the case of Huyett v ... Railroad Co., 23 Pa. 373, the Court said: "How ... ...
-
Henderson v. Railroad Co.
... ... APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS NO. 3 OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ... Page 463 ... COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ... Page 464 ... 2. The decisions in the first category are: Huyett v. Railroad Co., 23 Pa. 373; Lackawanna etc. R. Co. v. Doak, 52 Pa. 379; ... Co. v. Decker, 78 Pa. 293; Jennings v. Railroad Co., 93 Pa. 337; Reading etc. R. Co. v. Latshaw, 93 Pa. 449; Albert v. Railway Co., 98 Pa. 318, ... Co., at the time of the injury complained of, was an incorporated company, entitled to the right of way for its engines, etc., upon their track, as ... ...