Hyatt v. Eckel Valve Co.
| Court | California Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | FOX |
| Citation | 336 P.2d 551,169 Cal.App.2d 35 |
| Parties | Matter of the Arbitration between Walter J. HYATT, Petitioner and Respondent, v. ECKEL VALVE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. 23420. |
| Decision Date | 23 March 1959 |
Page 551
v.
ECKEL VALVE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.
[169 Cal.App.2d 36] Franklin L. Knox, Jr., George O. West, Los Angeles, for appellant.
Alef & Schnitzer and Arthur Alef, Beverly Hills, for respondent.
FOX, Presiding Justice.
This is an appeal by the defendant from an order confirming an arbitration award, from the judgment entered thereon, and from the order denying its motion to vacate the award.
The controversy submitted to the arbitrators grew out of a letter-agreement of September 11, 1956, by which the defendant company gave Hyatt the exclusive right to sell the company's products in California and Arizona upon certain specified terms. Under paragraph 4 of the agreement, Hyatt's compensation was 5 per cent commission on net sales. He was to receive what might be termed a drawing account of $1,000 per month, plus mileage and other travel and entertainment expenses. Paragraph 2. By paragraph 3 it was provided that: 'If at the time of termination of this agreement, for any reasons other than formation of a jointly owned corporation, the commissions due Mr. Hyatt are not equal to the sums advanced under Item 2, above, the sums advanced shall be considered as remuneration for services rendered, and Eckel Valve Company shall have no further claim for reimbursement from Hyatt.' Paragraph 5 stated: 'This contract may be terminated without cause, by either party, upon thirty (30) days written notice. In event of such termination, neither party shall have
Page 552
any claims upon the other, for any reason, except that Hyatt shall receive his full commission fee on all orders from his territory on the books at the time of termination; * * *.' Paragraph 6 provided that any disputes would be resolved by arbitration.On December 5, 1957, the company sent Hyatt a telegram saying: 'Advise representation agreement terminated, effective January 4, 1958.' That telegram was confirmed by [169 Cal.App.2d 37] letter from the company which read: 'Confirming our telegram of this date, please be advised that Fckel Valve Co. hereby terminates our agreement dated September 11, 1956, in accordance with paragraph 5, to be effective January 4, 1958. A revised agreement may be offered for your consideration prior to January 4, 1958.'
Hyatt continued with his sales representation of defendant's products until the January 4, 1958, termination date. On that date he had accrued commissions of $9,668.12 which were unpaid. The company refused to pay these commissions so Hyatt instituted arbitration proceedings as provided in the letter-agreement.
It was...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
National Marble Co. v. Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen
...effect an appeal from the judgment confirming the award and is reviewable on appeal from the judgment. (Hyatt v. Eckel Valve Co. (1959) 169 Cal.App.2d 35, 39, 336 P.2d 551; cf. Jordan v. Pacific Auto. Ins. Co. (1965) 232 Cal.App.2d 127, 129, 42 Cal.Rptr. 556.) Accordingly, National's appeal......
-
Hohn, Application of
...Confirming[229 Cal.App.2d 338] Award of Arbitrators that appellant appeals in this matter. This court said in Hyatt v. Eckel Valve Co., 169 Cal.App.2d 35, 39, 336 P.2d 551, 553, that 'if a judgment has been entered upon an order confirming the award, there is no appeal from the order but on......
-
People v. Wilkins, Cr. 6478
...the trial court in concluding that the defendant has violated the terms of his probation, and Page 545 in revoking the same. The [169 Cal.App.2d 35] appellant, having pleaded guilty to the petty theft charge, with the prior, cannot now contend that his probation on the attempted burglary ch......
-
Peirona v. Nguyen, A126551
...legal authority demonstrates that arbitrators have the power to proceed by way of an offer of proof. (Hyatt v. Eckel Valve Co. (1959) 169 Cal.App.2d 35, 38.) In sum, we reject all of Plaintiffs' challenges to the arbitration award and thus affirm the trial court's order confirming the award......
-
National Marble Co. v. Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen
...effect an appeal from the judgment confirming the award and is reviewable on appeal from the judgment. (Hyatt v. Eckel Valve Co. (1959) 169 Cal.App.2d 35, 39, 336 P.2d 551; cf. Jordan v. Pacific Auto. Ins. Co. (1965) 232 Cal.App.2d 127, 129, 42 Cal.Rptr. 556.) Accordingly, National's appeal......
-
Hohn, Application of
...Confirming[229 Cal.App.2d 338] Award of Arbitrators that appellant appeals in this matter. This court said in Hyatt v. Eckel Valve Co., 169 Cal.App.2d 35, 39, 336 P.2d 551, 553, that 'if a judgment has been entered upon an order confirming the award, there is no appeal from the order but on......
-
People v. Wilkins, Cr. 6478
...the trial court in concluding that the defendant has violated the terms of his probation, and Page 545 in revoking the same. The [169 Cal.App.2d 35] appellant, having pleaded guilty to the petty theft charge, with the prior, cannot now contend that his probation on the attempted burglary ch......
-
Peirona v. Nguyen, A126551
...legal authority demonstrates that arbitrators have the power to proceed by way of an offer of proof. (Hyatt v. Eckel Valve Co. (1959) 169 Cal.App.2d 35, 38.) In sum, we reject all of Plaintiffs' challenges to the arbitration award and thus affirm the trial court's order confirming the award......