Hyde v. Hyde
| Decision Date | 22 July 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 23639,23639 |
| Citation | 457 P.2d 393,169 Colo. 403 |
| Parties | Richard A. HYDE, Plaintiff in Error, v. Rose L. HYDE, Defendant In Error. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Bernard D. Morley, Denver, for plaintiff in error.
Mellman, Mellman & Thorn, Isaac Mellman, Denver, for defendant in error.
Rose L. Hyde was granted an uncontested divorce from Richard A. Hyde on May 12, 1968.The writ of error is to judgment of the trial court making a division of property and awarding permanent alimony to be paid to Mrs. Hyde.
Mr. Hyde, plaintiff in error here, contends that the trial court erred in the following matters: Awarding the family residence to Mrs. Hyde; valuing the business interests of Mr. Hyde at $35,000; awarding Mrs. Hyde the sum of $200 per month permanent alimony; finding that Mrs. Hyde was a partner in the prior partnership which is now a corporation and constitutes the major business interest owned by Mr. Hyde.
By law now so well-settled that citation of authority is deemed unnecessary, the granting of alimony and the division of property between husband and wife in divorce proceedings are matters resting within the sound jurisdiction of the trial judge.If the trial court's decision is supported by competent...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Carlson v. Carlson
...of the trial court, and unless the trial court abuses its discretion, the judgment of the trial court must be sustained. Hyde v. Hyde, 169 Colo. 403, 457 P.2d 393 (1969); Reap v. Reap, 142 Colo. 354, 350 P.2d 1063 (1960). See also, Annot., 'Adequacy of amount awarded as permanent alimony wh......
-
Rayer v. Rayer
...The division of property in a divorce proceeding again is a matter resting within the sound discretion of the trial court. Hyde v. Hyde, 169 Colo. 403, 457 P.2d 393. We find no abuse of that Finally, plaintiff claims that it was error for the trial court to not have awarded attorney fees to......
-
Moss v. Moss
...The trial court may award a wife more or less than one-half of the assets as the circumstances of the case may justify. Hyde v. Hyde, 169 Colo. 403, 457 P.2d 393. In the instant case, the division of assets was not so disproportionate as to amount to an abuse of Judgment affirmed. Van CISE,......
-
Thompson v. Thompson
...be disturbed on review when supported by competent evidence. Nunemacher v. Nunemacher, 132 Colo. 300, 287 P.2d 662; Hyde v. Hyde, 169 Colo. 403, 457 P.2d 393. From the facts before us, we do not find that the trial court abused its Judgment affirmed. SILVERSTEIN, C.J., and DUFFORD, J., conc......