I.R. Kirk Farms, Inc. v. Pointer

Decision Date15 February 1994
Docket NumberNo. WD,WD
CitationI.R. Kirk Farms, Inc. v. Pointer, 876 S.W.2d 283 (Mo. App. 1994)
PartiesI.R. KIRK FARMS, INC., Appellant, v. W.L. POINTER, Robert K. Sowers, Ralph Storey, Jay Plattner, and Richard K. Schwope, doing business as Investors Land Company, Weston Division, Respondents. 47910.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Price A. Sloan, Terrance M. Summers, Kansas City, for appellant.

Albert H. Chamberlain, Kansas City, for respondents.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.

SPINDEN, Judge.

At issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the lawsuit of I.R. Kirk Farms, Inc., which was seeking specific performance of an option contract to regain title to a large farm in Platte County. We reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.

Kirk sued for specific performance and damages on February 2, 1990. Its petition averred:

... Defendants, W.L. Pointer, Robert Sowers, Ralph Storey, Jay Plattner, and Richard Schwope, are partners in a Missouri General Partnership referred to as Investors Land Company, Weston Division, hereinafter collectively referred to as "Investors".

... On or about February 10, 1988, and February 18, 1988, [Kirk] entered into a written contract with Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and Investors whereby [Kirk] deeded to Equitable all of its right, title and interest in the ... described real property located in Platte County, Missouri[.]

... On or about February 12, 1988, [Kirk] and Investors entered into an Option Agreement and Right of First Refusal whereby Investors extended to [Kirk] an option to purchase the real property described ... upon certain terms and conditions....

... On or about April 12, 1988, a Warranty Deed from Equitable to Investors of the ... property was duly recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds in Platte County, Missouri. At or about the same time, a copy of the ... Option Agreement was also recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds in Platte County, Missouri.

... On or about February 11, 1989, [Kirk] exercised the option and tendered to Investors its check in the sum of $10,000.00 along with its letter of intent pursuant to said Option Agreement that Investors convey to [Kirk] merchantable fee simple title to the ... property. Investors refused, and still refuses, to sell said property to [Kirk], to accept said sums tendered to Investors by [Kirk], or to execute said deed to the property.

... [Kirk] performed all of its obligations under the Option Agreement with Investors except those that Investors has prevented [Kirk] from performing, and [Kirk] is ready, able and willing to purchase said property according to the terms and conditions of the Option Agreement as they were at the time [Kirk] exercised said Option in February of 1989. 1

Attached to Kirk's petition was a copy of the option agreement. Included in its provisions were these:

2. Deposit. Concurrently with the execution hereof, [Kirk] will pay to [Investors] the sum of ... $50 ... (the "Deposit") in consideration of [Investors'] grant of the Option and the Right of First Refusal. If [Kirk] fails to exercise any of its rights under either the Option or the Right of First Refusal as herein provided, [Investors] shall have the right to retain the Deposit, and neither party shall have any rights and remedies hereunder. In the event [Kirk] exercises any of its rights under the Option or the Right of First Refusal, the Deposit shall be applied toward the payment of the purchase price to be paid by [Kirk] as hereinafter provided.

3. Option.

3.1 The Option shall have a term of two ... years, commencing on [February 12, 1988,] and ending February 17, 1990, and if not exercised within said ... period, the Option shall lapse, expire and become null and void.

3.2 [Kirk] shall exercise the Option by giving written notice to [Investors] ... at any time on or before February 17, 1990. Upon the exercise of the Option by [Kirk], this Agreement shall immediately operate as a real estate sale contract on the terms hereinafter set forth.

....

3.4 The purchase price for the Property (the "Purchase Price") shall be computed as follows:

....

(b) If the Option is exercised on or prior to February 17, 1990, and after February 17, 1989, then the Purchase Price will be an amount equal to the sum of (i) ... $69,500.00 ... (ii) the total of all interest paid through the Closing Date (as herein defined) by [Investors] on the amount reflected in (i) above, (iii) ... $139,000.00

... and [Investors'] attorney's fees not to exceed ... $3,500[.]

The Purchase Price will be payable as follows: ... $10,000.00 ... payable upon the exercise of the Option which, together with the Option Deposit, shall constitute an earnest money deposit of ... $10,050.00 ... (the "Earnest Money"), and the balance of the Purchase Price shall be paid in cash at Closing as herein provided.

....

14. Remedies. If either party hereto shall default in the performance of its covenants and agreements set forth herein, the other party shall have all rights and remedies available at law, in equity or under this Agreement, including without limitation the right to obtain specific performance of this Agreement. [Investors] and [Kirk] hereby agree that in the event of any litigation between them, the non-prevailing party shall pay all fees, costs and expenses, specifically including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, expended or incurred by the prevailing party, and court costs, in connection with such litigation.

On ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • West Cent. Missouri Regional Lodge No. 50 v. Board of Police Com'rs of Kansas City, Mo.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • March 4, 1997
    ...intendment, treat all alleged facts as true, and construe the allegations favorable to the plaintiff. I.R. Kirk Farms, Inc. v. Pointer, 876 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Mo.App. W.D.1994). The only issue on appeal is whether the appellant has stated a claim for relief and is entitled to a trial on the m......
  • Brennan By and Through Brennan v. Curators of the University of Missouri
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • April 8, 1997
    ...our determination, we may not address the merits of the case or consider evidence outside the pleadings. I.R. Kirk Farms, Inc. v. Pointer, 876 S.W.2d 283, 285 n. 2 (Mo.App.1994). We begin with a brief examination of sovereign immunity law in Missouri. In Jones v. State Highway Comm'n, 557 S......
  • Flipps Nine, Inc. v. Missouri Property and Cas. Ins. Guar. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 28, 1997
    ...trial court's dismissal if, taking all the facts pleaded to be true, the petition states a cause of action. I.R. Kirk Farms, Inc. v. Pointer, 876 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Mo.App.1994). The facts alleged by Insureds in their petition indicate that Bel-Aire treated the premiums it received from Insur......
  • Clay Cnty. Comm'n v. Galloway
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 29, 2020
    ...‘must affirm the trial court's dismissal if any ground asserted in the defendant's motion is valid.’ " I.R. Kirk Farms, Inc. v. Pointer , 876 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Mo. App. W.D. 1994) (citation omitted).Here, the trial court dismissed the action finding that the Commission failed to state a clai......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Rule 55.16 Averments and Denial of Conditions Precedent
    • United States
    • The Missouri Bar Practice Books Civil Procedure (2007 Ed) Rule 55 Pleadings and Motions
    • Invalid date
    ...must allege and prove performance of all conditions precedent or sufficient excuse for nonperformance. I.R. Kirk Farms, Inc. v. Pointer, 876 S.W.2d 283, 285 (Mo. App. W.D. 1994). Any given contract may contain a large number of conditions precedent. Rather than requiring the pleading to set......