Iacco v. Bohannon
Decision Date | 04 August 1976 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 24502 |
Citation | 70 Mich.App. 463,245 N.W.2d 791 |
Parties | Daniel A. IACCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John BOHANNON and the School District of Clare, a third class school district, jointly and severally, Defendants-Appellees. 70 Mich.App. 463, 245 N.W.2d 791 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
[70 MICHAPP 464] Gorte & Brady by C. Michael Gorte, Bay City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Hughes & Trucks by Jay F. Trucks, Clare, for defendants-appellees.
Before DANHOF, P.J., and V. J. BRENNAN and KELLY, JJ.
Plaintiff appeals as of right from the May 19, 1975, order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants in plaintiff's action for libel and slander.
In April of 1973, plaintiff, a high school student at Clare High School, commenced this action for libel and slander against defendant Bohannon, a teacher and basketball coach at said school, and defendant school district, Bohannon's employer. The complaint averred that plaintiff was a good student, a good athlete and of a good reputation in the community. It was alleged that plaintiff was the captain of the varsity basketball team of which Bohannon was the coach. The complaint further alleged that on March 5, 1973, as the basketball team was preparing to enter the state basketball [70 MICHAPP 465] tournament playoffs, defendant Bohannon 'did intentionally call and gather together the other members of the Clare High School varsity basketball team and in their presence announced the suspension of your plaintiff from the aforesaid basketball team, and furthermore accused your plaintiff of conduct which was detrimental to the harmony of said basketball team' by way of the following statement:
The amended complaint further averred that subsequent to the above-noted statement, Bohannon distributed to the returning lettermen, reserves and basketball prospects for the 1973--74 high school basketball season a written statement containing the following language:
'I cannot stress enough my conviction to go with those players on the varsity, junior varsity, and freshman team that display appropriate attitude.
'Therefore, if you plan to play high school basketball for Clare (1) Develop and, or maintain loyalty.'
On appeal, plaintiff assigns as error the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendants on the basis that words imputing disloyalty on the part of plaintiff to his high school basketball team did not constitute actionable libel or slander. He also argues that the trial court should not have [70 MICHAPP 466] ruled that defendant school district was clothed with governmental immunity.
The motion for summary judgment, as it pertains to both defendants, was on the basis that plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. GCR 1963, 117.2(1). The trial court held that the language was not of so serious a nature as to hold a person up to ridicule and contempt, and, thus, was not actionable as a matter of law. Accordingly, the 'question that must be decided by this Court is whether, accepting all well-pleaded facts as being true, the * * * (language) so published is capable in law of a defamatory meaning'. Robbins v. Evening News Association, 373 Mich. 589, 590, 130 N.W.2d 404, 405 (1964).
The Supreme Court, in Nuyen v. Slater, 372 Mich. 654, 662, 127 N.W.2d 369, 374 (1964), in addressing itself to the question of whether there was actionable defamation, relied upon the definition of actionable defamation contained in 3 Restatement of Torts, § 559, p. 140, where it is stated:
'A communication is defamatory if it tends so to harm the reputation of another as to lower him in the estimation of the community or to deter third persons from associating or dealing with him.'
The question in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Thompson
...717, app. denied, 438 Mich. 873 (1991) ("Special damages . . . are losses having economic or pecuniary value."); Iacco v. Bohannon, 70 Mich.App. 463, 467, 245 N.W.2d 791 (1976) (Special damages are "damages of a pecuniary 23 Section 600.2911(7) provides that "an action for libel or slander ......
-
Knelman v. Middlebury Coll.
...any alleged misconduct of a member that “makes him undesirable for continued membership.” Id.; see also Iacco v. Bohannon, 70 Mich.App. 463, 467–68, 245 N.W.2d 791, 792–93 (1976) ( “As coach of the Clare team, defendant Bohannon had a duty to criticize the actions of the players with respec......
-
Apostle v. Booth Newspapers, Inc.
...104 Mich.App. at 64, 304 N.W.2d 814; Tumbarella v. Kroger, 85 Mich.App. 482, 495-496, 271 N.W.2d 284 (1978); Iacco v. Bohannon, 70 Mich.App. 463, 467, 245 N.W.2d 791 (1976); Walker v. Cahalan, 542 F.2d 681, 685 (CA 6 1976). These cases instead use a standard of malice which includes reckles......
-
Baggs v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
...at 280-81; Swenson, 135 Mich.App. at 637, 354 N.W.2d 288; Tumbarella, 85 Mich.App. at 494, 271 N.W.2d 284; Iacco v. Bohannon, 70 Mich.App. 463, 467, 245 N.W.2d 791 (1976), lv. den. 399 Mich. 846 (1977). In order to prove actual malice, plaintiffs must show that defendant made the statements......