Idaho v. Dacey
Docket Number | 47497 |
Decision Date | 21 July 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
State v. Smith
...may clarify the choices available to a trial court in exercising its discretionary line drawing. For example, in State v. Dacey , 169 Idaho 102, 109, 491 P.3d 1205, 1212 (2021), we corrected the line, previously disagreed on by trial courts, when it comes to opinion testimony from an office......
-
Valentine v. Valentine
...by the evidence in the record and (2) consistent with the law ... [this Court] must reverse the district court." State v. Dacey , 169 Idaho 102, ––––, 491 P.3d 1205, 1210 (2021). A decision to modify a child support order "is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be di......
-
Van Orden v. Van Orden
...must reverse the district court." Valentine v. Valentine , 169 Idaho 621, 625, 500 P.3d 514, 518 (2021) (quoting State v. Dacey , 169 Idaho 102, 107, 491 P.3d 1205, 1210 (2021) ). This Court freely reviews questions of law. Porcello v. Estate of Porcello , 167 Idaho 412, 421, 470 P.3d 1221,......
-
Herr v. Herr
...and determine whether they were (1) supported by the evidence in the record and (2) consistent with the law." State v. Dacey , 169 Idaho 102, 491 P.3d 1205, 1210 (2021) (citing Pelayo v. Pelayo , 154 Idaho 855, 858–59, 303 P.3d 214, 217–18 (2013) ). If so, we affirm the district court's dec......