Idaho v. Wharton
| Docket Number | 48631 |
| Decision Date | 23 May 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
State v. Galindo
...from traffic stop's initial purpose during drug-dog sniff and relying on Rodriguez , Linze , and Karst ); State v. Wharton , 170 Idaho 329, 335, 510 P.3d 682, 688 (2022) (holding practice of checking passengers for warrants during traffic stop "is a negligibly burdensome precaution for offi......
-
Meyer v. State
...safely." Rodriguez v. United States , 575 U.S. 348, 355-56, 135 S.Ct. 1609, 191 L.Ed.2d 492 (2015) ; see also State v. Wharton , 170 Idaho 329, 332, 510 P.3d 682, 685 (2022). Such negligibly burdensome precautions include, as a matter of course, ordering all the occupants of a vehicle to ex......
-
State v. Van Zanten
...of a criminal violation. This argument, however, overlooks one of the missions of a traffic stop: safety. See State v. Wharton, 170 Idaho 329, 332, 510 P.3d 682, 685 (2022) (examining the mission of a traffic stop). The United States Supreme Court has explained that the "mission" of a traff......