Ielovich v. Taylor Mach. Works, Inc.
Decision Date | 16 March 1987 |
Citation | 513 N.Y.S.2d 175,128 A.D.2d 676 |
Parties | Edoardo IELOVICH, et al., Respondents, v. TAYLOR MACHINE WORKS, INC., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (and a Third-Party Action) |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Lian, Geringer & Dolan, New York City (Louis G. Adolfsen, of counsel), for appellant.
Lipsig, Sullivan & Liapakis, P.C., New York City (Jay W. Dankner and Cheryl Eisberg Moin, of counsel), for respondents.
Before NIEHOFF, J.P., and LAWRENCE, WEINSTEIN and SULLIVAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., Taylor Machine Works, Inc. (hereinafter Taylor) appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), dated September 12, 1985 which granted the plaintiffs' cross motion for an order directing a further deposition of its chief engineer J.T. Monk, and (2) as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court, also dated September 12, 1985, as denied that branch of its motion which was for a protective order vacating item no. 2 of the plaintiffs' notice for discovery and inspection dated November 28, 1984, and directed the production of "all" transcripts of certain proceedings.
ORDERED that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.
As no appeal lies as of right from an order granting a further deposition of a witness already deposed, the appeal as of right from the order granting that relief is dismissed (see, Sainz v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 106 A.D.2d 500, 483 N.Y.S.2d 37; Roberts v. Modica, 102 A.D.2d 886, 477 N.Y.S.2d 59).
Edoardo Ielovich was struck and severely injured by a toploader vehicle. The plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that Taylor, the manufacturer, failed to properly equip the toploader to prevent such...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Scalone v. Phelps Memorial Hosp. Center
...no appeal lies as of right from an order granting a further deposition of a witness already deposed (see, Ielovich v. Taylor Machine Works, 128 A.D.2d 676, 513 N.Y.S.2d 175; Sainz v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 106 A.D.2d 500, 483 N.Y.S.2d 37). However, where an appeal raises issue......
-
Cannistra by Cannistra v. Putnam County
...pertaining to all of Robert's educational and medical records was overbroad and patently improper ( see, Ielovich v. Taylor Mach. Works, 128 A.D.2d 676, 513 N.Y.S.2d 175; Zimmerman v. New York City Tr. Auth., 115 A.D.2d 738, 496 N.Y.S.2d 547). Counsel for the appellants nevertheless offered......
-
Muller v. Sorensen
...an order determining an application made to review objections made at an examination before trial ( see, e.g., Ielovich v. Taylor Mach. Works, 128 A.D.2d 676, 153 N.Y.S.2d 175; Stoller v. Moo Young Jun, 118 A.D.2d 637, 499 N.Y.S.2d 790). The appellant failed to seek permission of this court......
-
Winiecki v. Melroe Co.
... ... Third-Party Plaintiff; ... Ireland-Gannon Associates, Inc., Third-Party Defendant ... Supreme Court, Appellate ... in nature to the accident in question here (see, Ielovich v. Taylor Mach. Works, 128 A.D.2d ... 676, 513 N.Y.S.2d ... ...