Ienco v. Rfd Second Avenue, LLC

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationIenco v. Rfd Second Avenue, LLC, 41 A.D.3d 537, 840 N.Y.S.2d 792, 2007 NY Slip Op 5226 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Decision Date12 June 2007
Docket Number2006-08488.
PartiesILARIO IENCO et al., Respondents, v. RFD SECOND AVENUE, LLC, et al., Appellants.

Ordered that order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants hired Atlantic Heydt (hereinafter Atlantic), the employer of the plaintiff Ilario Ienco, to remove temporary elevators that had been used in the construction of a building. In order to do so, Ienco and his partner had to loosen bolts from a 250-pound steel beam that was just above their heads, while standing on a 13-foot long and 1-foot wide aluminum plank, remove the beam from the column it was in, and then pass the beam to Atlantic workers who were standing approximately six feet below. After they removed the bolts from one beam on the 20th floor, Ienco's partner removed his end of the beam from the column. However, as Ienco struggled to remove the other end of the beam, it suddenly came free and struck him in his shoulder and arm causing him to sustain, inter alia, a broken elbow. Once the beam struck Ienco, he began to lose his balance and fall, but he was able to stop his fall by bracing his right foot against a piece of metal. In doing so, Ienco hit his head against a metal column sustaining a head injury. Despite losing his balance and almost falling, Ienco managed to grab the beam, hold onto it, and then, with his partner, pass it to the Atlantic employees below. According to Ienco's deposition testimony, he was not provided with a safety harness. Ienco's foreman testified to the contrary at his deposition stating that, at the time of the accident, Ienco was tied to the building.

Labor Law § 240 (1) requires contractors and owners to provide workers with appropriate safety devices to protect against "such specific gravity-related accidents as falling from a height or being struck by a falling object that was improperly hoisted or inadequately secured" (Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 501 [1993]; see Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc., 96 NY2d 259, 267-268 [2001]). Here, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' cause of action based on Labor Law § 240 (1) under the "falling worker" theory of liability (see Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc., supra at 267-268) as the defendants failed to satisfy their prima facie burden establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Ienco's deposition testimony raises a triable issue of fact as to whether he was provided with any safety devices such as a harness (see Pesca v City of New York, 298 AD2d 292, 293 [2002]; see also Cordero v Kaiser Org., 288 AD2d 424, 425-426 [2001]; Lacey v Turner Constr. Co., 275 AD2d 734, 735 [2000]; see generally Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). As the Supreme Court correctly determined, "[i]t is of no consequence that plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries as he prevented himself from falling further" (Ortiz v Turner Constr. Co., 28 AD3d 627, 628 [2006]).

The Supreme Court also correctly determined that the "falling object" theory of liability (see Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc., supra at 267-268) under Labor Law § 240 (1) was inapplicable. The undisputed...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Eddy v. John Hummel Custom Builders, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 21, 2016
    ...N.Y.S.2d 900, 640 N.E.2d 1134 ; see also Cruz v. Neil Hospitality, LLC, 50 A.D.3d 619, 620, 855 N.Y.S.2d 219 ; Ienco v. RFD Second Ave., LLC, 41 A.D.3d 537, 539, 840 N.Y.S.2d 792 ; Parker v. Ariel Assoc. Corp., 19 A.D.3d 670, 671–672, 798 N.Y.S.2d 489 ).More fundamentally, however, the plai......
  • Cardenas-Parra v. 540 Fulton Assocs.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 23, 2023
    ... ... dismissed 13 N.Y.3d 857 [2009]; see also Ienco v RFD ... Second Ave., LLC , 41 A.D.3d 537 [2d Dept 2007]; ... Ortiz v Turner Constr. Co. , 28 ... ...
  • RS JZ Driggs LLC v. Concrete Courses Concepts Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • June 14, 2023
    ...869 [2010]; Vislocky v City of New York, 62 A.D.3d 785, 786 [2d Dept 2009], Iv dismissed 13 N.Y.3d 857 [2009]; see also lenco v RFD Second Ave., LLC, 41 A.D.3d 537 [2007]; Ortiz v Turner Constr. Co., 28 A.D.3d 627 Lacey v Turner Constr. Co., 275 A.D.2d 734, 735 [2000]; Smith v Artco Indus. ......
  • Tenemaza v. PS 488 Grp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 28, 2023
    ... ... HYBRID FRAMING & INTERIORS INC., Second Third-Party Plaintiff, v. JDS CARPENTRY CORP., Second Third-Party Defendant. Index No ... (hereafter "Galil") were the co-owners of the ... premises known as 488 Fourth Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, at all ... relevant times, and that the other defendant, Happy Living ... Dept 2009], lv dismissed 13 N.Y.3d 857 [2009]; ... see also Ienco v RFD Second Ave., LLC , 41 A.D.3d 537 ... [2d Dept 2007]; Ortiz v Turner Constr. Co. , 28 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free