Ijams v. Duvall
| Decision Date | 24 February 1897 |
| Citation | 36 A. 819,85 Md. 252 |
| Parties | IJAMS v. DUVALL. |
| Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Appeal from circuit court, Anne Arundel county.
Application by Alfred Ijams against Grafton Duvall for writ of mandamus. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Argued before McSHERRY, C.J., and FOWLER, PAGE, RUSSUM, BOYD, and BRISCOE, JJ.
Dennis Claude, for appellant.
Robert Moss, for appellee.
The facts of this case as presented by the record and conceded by counsel at the argument may be briefly stated as follows: At the election of 1895, Grafton Duvall and Alfred Ijams were opposing candidates for judge of the orphans' court of Anne Arundel county. Duvall was returned elected, received a commission from the governor, duly qualified, and entered upon the discharge of his duties as chief judge. The appellant having contested the election, the house of delegates, at the session of 1896, passed a resolution declaring Duvall "not duly and legally elected," and ordering an election to be held on the 21st of April 1896, in pursuance of section 12 of article 4 of the constitution. Because of certain legislation passed at the same session, this election could not be and was not held, so that the appellee has continued to hold the office up to the present time. On the 23d of April, 1896, the governor, on the supposition that there was no legal occupancy of the office appointed the appellant to fill the vacancy thereby occasioned. The appellant, having received the commission and taken the proper oath, demanded of the appellee the possession of the office, and, this being refused, he has applied for mandamus to compel the appellee to deliver the possession thereof. The application of the appellant is based upon the theory that the action of the house of delegates made a vacancy, within the meaning of the fortieth section of article 4 of the constitution. That section, after providing for the election of judges of the orphans' court defining their powers, and fixing their compensation proceeds: "In case of a vacancy in the office of judge of the orphans' court, the governor shall appoint subject to confirmation or rejection by the senate, some suitable person to fill the same for the residue of the term." From the above reading of this clause, in connection with the entire section, it seems obvious the "vacancy" here referred to is a vacancy occurring after an election by the people. The section first provides for the election of three men to be judges of the orphans' court. They are to be citizens of the state and residents for the 12 months preceding in the city or county in which "they may be elected, and shall have all the powers now vested in the orphans' court, subject to such changes as the legislature may prescribe. In case of a vacancy the governor shall appoint subject to confirmation or rejection by the senate "some suitable person to fill the same for the residue of the term." It would seem to be clear that the intention here manifested is that the judges of the orphans' court are to be elected by the people, and the "vacancy" referred to is one that may occur after there has been such an election; in other words, it is a vacancy created by the death, resignation, or by some other cause, of one or more of the "three men" who have been chosen by the qualified voters. This interpretation is supported by a fair construction of those other clauses of the constitution which provide for cases where there has been a failure for any cause to obtain a legal expression of the will of the people. By section 12, art. 4: "If in any case of election for judges, clerks of the courts of law and registers of wills, the opposing candidates shall have an equal number of votes, it shall be the duty of the governor to order a new election; and in case of any contested election, the governor shall send the returns to the house of delegates, which shall judge of the election and qualification of the candidates at such election; and if the judgment shall be against the one who has been returned elected, or the one who has been commissioned by the governor, the house of delegates shall order a new election within thirty days." It will be observed how careful the framers of the constitution have been to preserve to the people the right to constitute these officers. In case of a...
To continue reading
Request your trial