Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund v. City of Barry
Decision Date | 26 September 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 14425,14425 |
Citation | 367 N.E.2d 1048,10 Ill.Dec. 439,52 Ill.App.3d 644 |
Parties | , 10 Ill.Dec. 439 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND and its Board of Trustees, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF BARRY, a Municipal Corporation, and Ben E. Harris, William K. Bainter, Jr., M. Steven Conkright, P. Lloyd Harms, Individually and as representatives of a class, Defendants-Appellants. |
Court | United States Appellate Court of Illinois |
Gary L. Haddock, Pittsfield, for defendants-appellants.
John J. Edman, Chicago, for plaintiff-appellee.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action in which the plaintiff, Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (the Fund), received a judgment upholding its position that the defendant, City of Barry, had taken all the necessary steps and was, consequently, a participant in the Fund.
Under section 7-132 of the Pension Code (Ill.Rev.Stat.1975, ch. 1081/2, par. 7-132), towns under 5,000 in population which are not controlled by town electors (Barry has a mayor-aldermanic government) are not automatically required to join the Fund, but may elect Ill.Rev.Stat.1975, ch. 1081/2, par. 7-132(a)4.
On September 9, 1975, the city council of Barry passed an ordinance (No. 1975-3) electing to participate in the Fund. The city clerk then certified the ordinance and sent it to plaintiff's offices where it was filed on September 19, 1975.
On January 3, 1976, the city council of Barry changed its position with respect to participation in the Fund and passed an ordinance purporting to rescind ordinance No. 1975-3. The mayor of Barry then notified the Fund by letter dated January 19, 1976, that the city had revoked its participation in the Fund. This action precipitated the controversy and led plaintiff to file a complaint for declaratory judgment to determine whether the city of Barry could, by such action, remove itself from participation in the Fund. The trial court heard arguments on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and then denied it. Then, under a stipulation by the parties, the court decided the case based on the arguments of counsel, written briefs, and affidavits. On March 16, 1977, the trial court filed a written order finding that the city had taken the necessary action to participate in the Fund and was without power to subsequently withdraw.
In a case quite analogous to the present one, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the city of Chester was without power to withdraw from the Fund by enacting a rescinding ordinance. (People ex rel. Schuwerk v. Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (1955), 6 Ill.2d 405, 128 N.E.2d 923.) The Schuwerk opinion emphasized that since the statute provided no means for withdrawal, none could be implied. Here, the city conceded that Schuwerk forecloses withdrawal. The city takes a position that since the ordinance electing to participate in the Fund was not published, it was invalid. This argument hinges on the applicability of section 1-2-4 of the Illinois Municipal Code (Ill.Rev.Stat.1975, ch. 24, par. 1-2-4) which requires to be published:
Simply put, the issue is whether an ordinance electing to participate in the Fund requires publication, under the above statute, as making an appropriation. We agree with the trial court that it does not.
An...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Magee v. Boyd
... ... were to be paid out of the Education Trust Fund ("the ETF"). 1 Section 9 provided for a tax ... office where the original bill annexed one city to another. The relators challenged the ... demonstrating that the framers of the Illinois Constitution intended the term 'public fund' to ... American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Netsch , 216 Ill. App. 3d 566, 567, ... (1991), quoting Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund v. City of Barry , 52 Ill. App. 3d 644, 646, ... ...
-
Magee v. Boyd, 1130987, 1131020, 1131021.
... ... and Eric Baxter and Asma Uddin of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Washington, D.C., for ... of Alabama including superintendents of City of Madison Board of Education, Huntsville City ... demonstrating that the framers of the Illinois Constitution intended the term public fund to ... American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Netsch, 216 Ill.App.3d 566, 567, ... (1991), quoting Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund v. City of Barry, 52 Ill.App.3d 644, 646, ... ...
-
City of Countryside v. City of Countryside Police Pension Bd. of Trs.
... ... 1-17-1029 & 1-17-1069 cons. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. September 28, 2018 Thomas S. Radja Jr., of ... "longevity benefit" that would cost the City's pension fund $10,200 per retiring officer annually but save the City ... benefit ($850) = $80,117.22 base salary upon retirement $60,087.91 75% annual pension amount $ 5,007.32 monthly ... 300 122 N.E.3d 309 municipal law," (2) the City was not required to levy taxes or fund ... City of Barry , 52 Ill. App. 3d 644, 647, 10 Ill.Dec. 439, 367 N.E.2d ... ...
-
State v. Am. Fed'n of State, Cnty. & Mun. Emps., Council 31
... ... 907 The STATE of Illinois (The DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES), ... FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 31, Appellee. No. 118422 ... to the General Assembly sought to fully fund all collective bargaining contracts. However, the ... (1987) (quoting Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund v. City of Barry, 52 Ill.App.3d 644, 646, ... ...