Ilyin v. Avon Publications
Decision Date | 24 July 1956 |
Citation | 144 F. Supp. 368 |
Parties | Maximilian ILYIN, Plaintiff, v. AVON PUBLICATIONS, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Philip Rahv and William Phillips, Third-Party Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Borris M. Komar, New York City, for plaintiff.
William Gold, New York City, for defendant (P. Berner, P. Gitlin, New York City, of counsel).
No appearance for third-party defendants.
This is an action for copyright infringement and a third-party action for indemnification by the defendant publisher against the persons who allegedly gave it the right to publish the article in question — an English translation of Jean Cocteau's one-act play entitled, "The Human Voice." The facts are as follows:
On February 21, 1930, Librairie Stock Delamain & Boutelleau published, in France, Cocteau's play "La Voix Humaine." The following month it applied for and received a United States copyright (Class D pub. No. 5308) on this work. In November of the same year The Atlantic Monthly Company received a copyright (Class B No. 90470) on the entire November 1930 issue of its magazine which issue contained an English translation of the play under the title "Over the Wire."
The plaintiff, also known as Maximilian Abramowicz, and Cocteau entered into a contract in Paris on September 25, 1935, whereby Cocteau "assigned" to the plaintiff "for a period of twenty-one (21) years from this date, the rights to produce, exploit and present publicly, sound and talking motion pictures, in all languages, for all countries, said films to be based upon the one act play entitled: "`The Human Voice.'" This was supplemented on October 19, 1935, by a letter from Cocteau to the plaintiff granting the latter "by this letter, the exclusive rights to the aforementioned play, for the translation, publication, adaptation, staging and recording of this work, in all languages and for all countries, outside of France." The plaintiff thereafter translated the play and received a United States copyright (Class D unp. No. 90534) in September 1944 after filing one copy of the translation with the Register of Copyrights.
In November of 1947 Bowden Broadwater, Editorial Assistant of the Partisan Review, wrote to Librairie Stock seeking permission "to translate for publication in the Partisan Review" Cocteau's play. Such authorization was granted by letter dated December 5, 1947. The play was thereupon translated by Dudley Fitts who was paid the sum of $62 for his services. There is no evidence that Mr. Fitts had access to or copied plaintiff's translation. This translation was published in the July 1948 issue of the Partisan Review and a copyright on the entire issue (Class B No. 152365) was claimed on August 31, 1948. The plaintiff eventually became aware of this and in March of 1950 caused the William Morris Agency to write to Partisan Review informing them of plaintiff's alleged exclusive publication rights and requesting an explanation. The reply disclaimed all knowledge of Mr. Ilyin and referred to the license granted by Librairie Stock.
On November 20, 1950, plaintiff wrote the following letter to Librairie Stock:
Librairie Stock replied on November 23, 1950, "I confirm to you our agreement to the terms of your letter of November 20, 1950."
Thereafter, on January 24, 1953, Philip Rahv and William Phillips, editors of the Partisan Review, entered into a contract with the Avon Publishing Company, the defendant herein, whereby the latter was granted exclusive rights to print, bind and vend a book entitled "Stories in the Modern Manner from the Partisan Review." The contract also contained clauses to the effect that Rahv and Phillips owned the copyrights and publishing rights of the book materials and that they would hold Avon harmless against any suits or claims of copyright infringement.
Partisan Review wrote to Librairie Stock on March 10, 1953, enclosing a check for $35.70, one-half the advance royalty due for the use of Cocteau's play "in a collection of Partisan Review stories the Avon Publishing Company is bringing out here this summer in pocketbook form." The check was deposited upon receipt, but on April 27 Librairie Stock replied, The Partisan Review made no reply, but on August 8, 1953, sent another check for $35.70 saying that it was sorry about the misunderstanding but the April 27 letter arrived too late to do anything about it. Sometime prior to August 8, 1953, Stories in the Modern Manner, containing Fitts' translation of "The Human Voice", was published and sold 92,139 copies at 35¢ each at a loss of $2,061.50.
The second royalty check was also promptly deposited to the account of Librairie Stock, but on December 18, 1953, it sent the following letter to Partisan Review:
The answer alleges thirteen separate defenses. Those meriting any discussion may be condensed into four general categories: (1) defendant's publication did not constitute an infringement since it was made with the express authorization of a licensee of the copyright proprietor; (2) plaintiff cannot maintain this suit because of his failure to comply with certain of the formal provisions of the copyright act pertaining to the filing of copies and the notice of claim; (3) plaintiff's copyright is of no effect because his translation was made without the consent of the copyright proprietor; and (4) plaintiff cannot maintain this suit because he is not the real party in interest and because he has failed to join as indispensable parties Librairie Stock and the Atlantic Monthly.
From the facts as set forth above there can be absolutely no doubt that Avon was wholly unauthorized in publishing "The Human Voice" in its Stories in the Modern Manner. Its permission came solely from Rahv and Phillips, but such permission was not within their power to give. The original authorization sought from Librairie Stock in November of 1947 was simply for publication of a translation in the Partisan Review. And this was all that was granted. Partisan Review became a bare licensee, De Forrest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corporation of America, D.C.Del.1925, 9 F.2d 150; Innis, Speiden & Co. v. Food Machinery Corporation, D.C.Del.1942, 2 F.R.D. 261; Ball, Law of Copyright and Literary Property, § 236 (1944), without any right to assign its privilege. Troy Iron & Nail Factory v. Corning, 1852, 55 U.S. 193, 216, 14 L.Ed. 383; Hapgood v. Hewitt, 1886, 119 U.S. 226, 7 S.Ct. 193, 30 L.Ed. 369; Rock-Ola Mfg. Corporation v. Filben Mfg. Co., 8 Cir., 1948, 168 F.2d 919; Ball, op. cit. supra, § 236. The correspondence between Librairie Stock and Partisan Review in 1953 makes it abundantly clear that permission to reprint the translation of the play in book form was never even requested, let alone granted. The mere fact that Partisan Review secured a copyright on its July 1948 issue in which the Cocteau play appeared gives it no right to authorize a reprint by Avon. A blanket copyright on an issue of a periodical does not give any rights to a particular article unless such rights had been previously assigned to the publisher. Mail & Express Co. v. Life Pub....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ward v. National Geographic Soc.
... ... v. Christian Duplications Int'l, Inc., 743 F.Supp. 1533, 1546 (M.D.Fla.1990); Ilyin v. Avon Publ'ns, Inc., 144 F.Supp. 368, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 1956); Mills Music v. Cromwell Music, 126 ... ...
-
Jim Henson Productions v. Brady & Associates, 92 Civ. 5115(LAP).
... ... and recording of a copyright assignment does not create a legal ownership in the publications that did not already exist)), aff'd, 592 F.2d 651, 655 (2d Cir.1978); Pantone, Inc. v. A.I ... 3 Nimmer, § 10.03[B] at 10-42 n. 33; Ilyin v. Avon Publications, Inc., 144 F.Supp. 368 (S.D.N.Y.1956). Accordingly, the fact that the Hensons ... ...
-
Mason v. Jamie Music Pub. Co.
... ... 1997) (citing 3 Nimmer § 10.03[B] at 10-42 n. 33 and Ilyin v. Avon Publ'ns, Inc., 144 F.Supp. 368 (S.D.N.Y. 1956)). Indeed, the Second Circuit has held that ... ...
-
Eden Toys, Inc. v. Florelee Undergarment Co., Inc.
... ... , 7 consists of a body of illustrations of Paddington Bear in the books or other publications copyrighted by Paddington. The second tier (No. 2 above) consists of the new contributions made by ... See Ilyin v. Avon Publications, 144 F.Supp. 368, 373 (S.D.N.Y.1956); see also Gilliam v. American ... ...
-
An Exclusive License Is Not an Assignment: Disentangling Divisibility and Transferability of Ownership in Copyright
...that a copyright licensee is a ‘bare licensee . . . without any right to assign its privilege.’” (quoting Ilyin v. Avon Publ’ns, Inc., 144 F. Supp. 368, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 1956))); Id. (“A patent license has been characterized as ‘a naked license to make and sell the patented improvement as a pa......
-
Chapter V Intellectual Property Problems
...734 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir. 1984); Gardner v. Nike Inc., 279 F.3d 774, 779-81 (9th Cir. 2002).[26] See, e.g., Ilyin v. Avon Publications, 144 F.Supp. 368, 373 (S.D.N.Y. 1956).[27] Summit Inv. & Dev. Corp. v. Leroux, 69 F.3d 608 (1st Cir. 1995); Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp., 104 F......