Immigration Soc. Of Albemarle County v. Commonwealth
Decision Date | 22 September 1904 |
Citation | 48 S.E. 509,103 Va. 46 |
Parties | IMMIGRATION SOC. OF ALBEMARLE COUNTY v. COMMONWEALTH. |
Court | Virginia Supreme Court |
CRIMINAL LAW—SALE OP LAND.AS AGENT WITHOUT A LICENSE—STATUTES—CONSTRUCTION.
1. Act March 5, 1894 (Acts 1893-94, pp. 723, 724, c. 620) § 1, provides for the incorporation of societies to advertise for sale, and to sell or lease, the lands of their members. Section 2 provides that societies organized thereunder may be appointed agents or attorneys in fact to sell, lease, or exchange lands. By section 3 they are exempted from the payment of a license tax. Act April 16, 1903, § 54 (Acts 1902-1904, pp. 155, 188, c. 148), makes it an indictable offense for any firm or corporation to do business as a land agent, as therein defined, without the payment of a license tax. Held, that a society organized under Act March 5, 1894. is indictable under Act April 16, 1903, where it offered for sale, as land agent, without a license, for compensation, lands not owned by members of the society.
2. The argument of inconvenience, absurdity, injustice, or prejudice to the public interests
¶ 2. See Statutes, vol. 44, Cent. Dig. § 263 may be considered, in construing a statute, when its language is ambiguous.
Error to Corporation Court of Charlottesville.
The Immigration Society of Albemarle County was convicted of unlawfully selling and offering to sell land without a license, and brings error. Affirmed.
D. Harman and R. A. Watson, for plaintiff in error.
The Attorney General, William A. Anderson, and J. S. Eggleston, for the Commonwealth.
Albemarle County was indicted in the corporation court of the city of Charlottesville, at the January term, 1904, for unlawfully selling and offering to sell land in the city of Charlottesville without having first obtained a license therefor. The Immigration Society of Upon the trial of the cause, a jury having been waived, and all matters of law and fact having been submitted to the court, the land company was found guilty of the offense charged, and a fine of $100 assessed against it. To that judgment this writ of error was awarded.
As the decision of all the assignments of error depends upon the construction of the act under which the plaintiff in error was organized and did business, they will be considered together.
It appears from the evidence—indeed, it is admitted—that the defendant company, within eight months prior to the finding of the indictment, did, in the city of Charlottesville, where its principal office was located, offer for sale, as land agent, for compensation, lands not owned by members of the land company. It was therefore guilty of violating section 54 of chapter 148 of the act of assembly approved April 16, 1903, entitled "An act to raise revenue for the support of the government, " etc. Acts 1902-1904, pp. 155, 188, prohibiting any person, firm, or corporation from doing business as a land agent, as therein defined, without the payment of a license tax, unless, as is contended, the defendant was exempt from the payment of such tax by an act of Assembly approved March 5, 1894, entitled "An act to encourage immigration into the commonwealth of Virginia, and to promote the sales of lands within the commonwealth to immigrants" (Acts 1893-94, pp. 723, 724, e. 620), and under which the defendant company was incorporated.
The provisions of the act, so far as they are material to the question under consideration, are as follows:
ginia. The object for which said society is formed is to advertise for sale and to sell or lease the lands of the members of said society, in such manner and upon such terms as may be provided by the constitution and by-laws of the society adopted by the members thereof; the officers of said society, to manage its affairs for the first year and until their successors are elected and qualified, will be a president, a secretary, a treasurer and a board of directors, which board shall consist of not less than five persons nor more than nine, as the said society at the time of its organization shall determine. The principal office of said society will be at ——, in said county.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Marcum v. Three States Lumber Company
...favorable to the appellee from the undisputed evidence must be taken. 88 S.W. 988; 91 Mo.App. 539 and cases cited; 63 A. 204; 93 S.W. 869; 48 S.E. 509; 155 Mo. 382; 2 Am. St. 193; 15 Wall. 524; 47 Rep. 566; 9 Am. & Eng. R. Cas. 445; 164 Mass. 257. 2. The proof without conflict shows that ap......
-
C. & O. Ry. Co. v. Hewin
...should be considered. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. N. & W. Ry. Co., supra; Sherwood Atlantic & D.R. Co., supra; Immigration Soc. Commonwealth, 103 Va. 46, 48 S.E. 509; Knowlton Moore, 178 U.S. 41, 20 S.Ct. 747, 44 L.Ed. 3, 4 Primary and ordinary definitions of words are to be adopted unless t......
-
Chesapeake &. O. Ry. Co v. Hewin
...should be considered. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. N. & W. Ry. Co., supra; Sherwood v. Atlantic & D. R. Co., supra; Immigration Soc. v. Commonwealth, 103 Va. 46, 48 S. E. 509; Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U. S. 41, 20 S. Ct. 747, 44 L. Ed. 969. Primary and ordinary definitions ofwords are to be adopt......
-
Hasson v. City of Chester
... ... political party or organization for national, state, county, ... and magisterial district elections is not one for the ... Sohn, 54 W.Va. 101, ... 46 S.E. 222; Immigration Society v. Commonwealth, ... 103 Va. 46, 48 S.E. 509 ... ...