Imtanios v. Goldman Sachs

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation9 N.Y.3d 1028,852 N.Y.S.2d 11,881 N.E.2d 1198
Decision Date15 January 2008
PartiesNehme IMTANIOS, Appellant, v. GOLDMAN SACHS et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. American Building Maintenance Co., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
881 N.E.2d 1198
9 N.Y.3d 1028
852 N.Y.S.2d 11
Nehme IMTANIOS, Appellant,
v.
GOLDMAN SACHS et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents.
American Building Maintenance Co., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of New York.
January 15, 2008.

Reported below, 44 A.D.3d 383, 843 N.Y.S.2d 569.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this action commenced in Civil Court of the City of New York (N.Y. Const, art VI, § 3[b][7]; CPLR 5602[a] ).

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • Vega v. Restani Constr. Corp..
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 27, 2010
    ...inherent in the work he is tasked to perform ( Imtanios v. Goldman Sachs, 44 A.D.3d 383, 385–386, 843 N.Y.S.2d 569 [2007], lv. dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 1028, 852 N.Y.S.2d 11, 881 N.E.2d 1198 [2008] ). It is also true that “[w]hen a workman confronts the ordinary and obvious hazards of his employm......
  • Mejia v. 110 William, LLC, 13973
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • June 1, 2021
    ...46 N.Y.S.3d 891 [1st Dept. 2017] ; Imtanios v. Goldman Sachs, 44 A.D.3d 383, 385–386, 843 N.Y.S.2d 569 [1st Dept. 2007], lv dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 1028, 852 N.Y.S.2d 11, 881 N.E.2d 1198 [2008] ).In light of the foregoing, we need not reach plaintiff's remaining...
  • Black v. Wallace Church Assocs.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 23, 2017
    ...812 N.Y.S.2d 91 [1st Dept.2006] ; see also Imtanios v. Goldman Sachs, 44 A.D.3d 383, 385, 843 N.Y.S.2d 569 [1st Dept.2007], lv. dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 1028, 852 N.Y.S.2d 11, 881 N.E.2d 1198 [2008] ), and here, plaintiff stated that as part of his job cleaning the bathroom, he frequently removed......
3 cases
  • Vega v. Restani Constr. Corp..
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • May 27, 2010
    ...inherent in the work he is tasked to perform ( Imtanios v. Goldman Sachs, 44 A.D.3d 383, 385–386, 843 N.Y.S.2d 569 [2007], lv. dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 1028, 852 N.Y.S.2d 11, 881 N.E.2d 1198 [2008] ). It is also true that “[w]hen a workman confronts the ordinary and obvious hazards of his employm......
  • Mejia v. 110 William, LLC, 13973
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • June 1, 2021
    ...46 N.Y.S.3d 891 [1st Dept. 2017] ; Imtanios v. Goldman Sachs, 44 A.D.3d 383, 385–386, 843 N.Y.S.2d 569 [1st Dept. 2007], lv dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 1028, 852 N.Y.S.2d 11, 881 N.E.2d 1198 [2008] ).In light of the foregoing, we need not reach plaintiff's remaining...
  • Black v. Wallace Church Assocs.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • February 23, 2017
    ...812 N.Y.S.2d 91 [1st Dept.2006] ; see also Imtanios v. Goldman Sachs, 44 A.D.3d 383, 385, 843 N.Y.S.2d 569 [1st Dept.2007], lv. dismissed 9 N.Y.3d 1028, 852 N.Y.S.2d 11, 881 N.E.2d 1198 [2008] ), and here, plaintiff stated that as part of his job cleaning the bathroom, he frequently removed......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT