IN-FLIGHT DEVICES CORPORATION v. Van Dusen Air, Inc., No. 71-1948.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | PHILLIPS, , CELEBREZZE, Circuit , and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit |
| Citation | 466 F.2d 220 |
| Parties | IN-FLIGHT DEVICES CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VAN DUSEN AIR, INCORPORATED, etc., Defendant-Appellee. |
| Decision Date | 10 August 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 71-1948. |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
301 practice notes
-
Pioneer Properties, Inc. v. Martin, No. 81-1137.
...or with such knowledge as to make his deeds the equivalent of purposeful action." In-flight Devices Corp. v. Van Dusen Air, Inc., 466 F.2d 220, 226 (6th Here, forum activity was a foreseeable consequence of the agreements, which contemplated future advances by plaintiff, as well as the......
-
Res. Assocs. Grant Writing & Evaluation Servs., Inc. v. Southampton Union Free Sch. Dist., No. CIV 15-1132 JB/SCY
...pursued the transaction with Resource Associates. See Response at 9 (citing In – Flight Devices Corp. v. V a n Dusen Air, Inc., 466 F.2d 220, 227 (6th Cir.1972) ). Resource Associates attacks Southampton Union's suggestion that the only possible basis for jurisdiction would be if the partie......
-
Youn v. Track, Inc., No. 01-3625.
...23 F.3d 1110, 1115 (6th Cir.1994); Welsh v. Gibbs, 631 F.2d 436, 439 (6th Cir.1980); In-Flight Devices Corp. v. Van Dusen Air, Inc., 466 F.2d 220, 224 (6th The bedrock principle of personal jurisdiction due process analysis is that when the Defendant is not physically present in the forum, ......
-
Theunissen v. Matthews, No. 90-1647
...436, 439 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 981, 101 S.Ct. 1517, 67 L.Ed.2d 816 (1981); In-Flight Devices Corp. v. Van Dusen Air, Inc. 466 F.2d 220, 224 (6th Cir.1972). However, constitutional concerns of due process limit the application of this state law. Welsh, 631 F.2d at We begin b......
Request a trial to view additional results
301 cases
-
Res. Assocs. Grant Writing & Evaluation Servs., Inc. v. Southampton Union Free Sch. Dist., No. CIV 15-1132 JB/SCY
...pursued the transaction with Resource Associates. See Response at 9 (citing In – Flight Devices Corp. v. V a n Dusen Air, Inc., 466 F.2d 220, 227 (6th Cir.1972) ). Resource Associates attacks Southampton Union's suggestion that the only possible basis for jurisdiction would be if the partie......
-
Hoover v. Recreation Equipment Corp., No. 89-CV-1896.
...L.Ed.2d 490 (1980); American Greetings Corp. v. Cohn, 839 F.2d 1164, 1167 (6th Cir.1988); In-Flight Devices Corp. v. Van Dusen Air, Inc., 466 F.2d 220, 224 (6th Cir.1972). This court's jurisdiction over the defendant is predicated upon an application of the Ohio Long Arm Statute, Ohio Revis......
-
Thompson v. Kerr, No. C-3-81-035.
...in personam jurisdiction to be asserted over the non-resident director defendants. See, In-Flight Devices Corp. v. Van Dusen Air, Inc., 466 F.2d 220, 224 n.3 (6th Cir.1972) (certified mail pursuant to Ohio Rule 4.3 is only effective upon non-resident defendants "where a valid basis for in p......
-
Hoover v. Recreation Equipment Corp., No. 89-CV-1896.
...L.Ed.2d 490 (1980); American Greetings Corp. v. Cohn, 839 F.2d 1164, 1167 (6th Cir.1988); In-Flight Devices Corp. v. Van Dusen Air, Inc., 466 F.2d 220, 224 (6th Cir.1972). This court's jurisdiction over the defendant is predicated upon an application of the Ohio Long Arm Statute, Ohio Revis......
Request a trial to view additional results