In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 381.

Decision Date01 May 1980
Docket NumberMDL No. 381.
PartiesIn re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York

Victor J. Yannacone, Jr., Yannacone & Yannacone, Patchogue, N. Y., Schlegel & Trafelet, Ltd., L. Steven Platt, Daniel C. Sullivan, Sullivan Associates, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., Hy Mayerson, Spring City, Pa., David Jaroslawicz, New York City, Newton B. Schwartz, P. C., Benton Musslewhite, Inc., Houston, Tex., Melvin Block, Brooklyn, N. Y., Marshall A. Bernstein, Bernstein, Bernstein & Harrison, Philadelphia, Pa., Louis B. Merhige, New Orleans, La., Dorothy Thompson, Los Angeles, Cal., W. T. McMillan, W. T. McMillan & Co., Associated Counsel for Australian plaintiffs, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, Jerry G. Wieslander, Frank G. Wieslander, Altoona, Iowa, Lewis A. Royal, Samuel Zelden, Des Moines, Iowa, David C. Anson, Deconcini, McDonald, Brammer, Yetwin & Lacy, Tucson, Ariz., Phillip E. Brown, Hoberg, Finger, Brown, Cox & Molliga, San Francisco, Cal., Leslie Hulnick, Wichita, Kan., Sidney W. Gilreath, Knoxville, Tenn., for plaintiffs.

Leonard L. Rivkin, Rivkin, Leff & Sherman, Garden City, N. Y., Morton B. Silberman, Clark, Gagliardi & Miller, White Plains, N. Y., Roy L. Reardon, James P. Barrett and Michael V. Corrigan, Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, Wendell B. Alcorn, Jr., Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, Townley & Updike, Bud Holman and William Krohley, Kelley, Drye & Warren, New York City, William H. Sanders, William A. Lynch and Paul G. Lane, Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., Baker & McKenzie, Chicago, Ill., John M. Fitzpatrick, Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Kauffman, Philadelphia, Pa., Joan Bernott, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

GEORGE C. PRATT, District Judge.

The following orders are based on proceedings at the April 25, 1980 oral argument:

1. With the consent of all parties, the government's motion to dismiss the third-party complaints shall be deemed also to have been directed against the third party complaint of Hooker Chemical and Plastics Company served after the motion was made, and Hooker's "Memorandum of Points and Authorities" in opposition to the motion may be considered by the court.

2. All defendants, including Hooker Chemical and Plastics Company, shall have until Friday, May 2, 1980 to submit additional papers on the pending summary judgment motions, as to which decision was reserved at the April 24, 1980 argument.

3. Dow's motion for a protective order exempting from discovery its "proposed Computer Document Retrieval and Litigation Support System" is deemed to be withdrawn without prejudice. Dow may renew the motion if the parties cannot agree on a suitable arrangement for protecting the information.

4. The request by plaintiffs' counsel, Victor Yannacone, that additional...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 25 September 1984
    ...506 F.Supp. 750 (E.D.N.Y.1980) (deeming each defendant to have denied the cross-claims asserted against it by other defendants); 506 F.Supp. 753 (E.D.N.Y.1980) (denying request of plaintiffs' counsel to certify additional documents for review on appeal); 506 F.Supp. 753 (E.D.N.Y.1980) (gove......
  • Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 15 November 1991
    ... ... In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION ... 747, 89 Civ. 3361 and 90 Civ. 3928, MDL No. 381 ... United States District Court, E.D. New ... ...
  • In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Lit.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 9 February 2004
    ... Page 404 ... 304 F.Supp.2d 404 ... In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION ... Joe Isaacson and Phillis Lisa Isaacson, Plaintiffs, ... Dow Chemical Company, et al., Defendants, ... Daniel Raymond Stephenson, et al., ntiffs, ... Dow Chemical Company, et al., Defendants ... Nos. MDL 381, CV 98-6383(JBW), CV 99-3056(JBW) ... United States District Court, E.D. New York ... February 9, 2004 ... Page 405 ... COPYRIGHT MATERIAL ... ...
  • In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 28 March 2005
    ... ... and "ABC Chemical Companies 1-100," Defendants ... No. MDL 381 ... No. 04-CV-400 ... United States District Court, E.D. New York ... March 10, 2005 ... As Amended March 28, 2005 ... COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ... COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ... COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ... COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED ...         Constantine P ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT