In re Agnew

Decision Date03 November 1909
PartiesIn re AGNEW.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi

Following is the opinion of the referee:

To the Hon. H. C. Niles, District Judge:

During the administration of the above matter the F. A. Ames Company, a creditor of the bankrupt, filed on January 30 1909, its petition as follows:

'Now comes the F. A. Ames Company, a corporation duly chartered organized, and existing, and respectfully represents: That heretofore it made and entered into that certain contract made Exhibit A hereto, with said Agnew, whereby it ships to said Agnew those certain vehicles described in Exhibit B hereto annexed and made a part of as fully as if copied herein. That in and by said Exhibit A it was then and there contracted and agreed: 'It is expressly understood and agreed that all goods on hand and proceeds of all sales of goods received under this contract; also all goods hereinafter shipped to the maker of this contract, whether the proceeds are in notes, cash, or book accounts, are to be held as collateral security in trust, and for the benefit of and subject to the order of the F. A. Ames Company, until full cash settlement has been made of our obligations due to the said F. A. ames Company. The title to and ownership of all goods shipped under this contract shall remain vested in the F. A. Ames Company until the price thereof shall have been paid; but nothing in this clause shall be considered a release from making payments as provided elsewhere in this contract. * * * It is further agreed, in case of death or financial embarrassment of the firm, or any member or individual making this contract, all accounts or notes for goods bought under this contract shall become immediately due and payable.' And your petitioner shows that those certain goods listed in said Exhibit B, hereunto annexed and made part hereof as fully as if copied herein, are on hand with the trustee, and are the property of your petitioner, and should be set aside. Upon information and belief your petitioner avers that there are certain notes, accounts, and cash received by said Agnew which he holds in trust for this petitioner, and, with reference thereto, this petitioner is not advised, but prays discovery with reference to the same. Your petitioner further avers that said Agnew upon December 30, 1908, made, executed, and delivered said Exhibit B, hereunto annexed, whereby the terms and conditions contained in said Exhibit A were ratified and confirmed, and your petitioner charges that, in pursuance thereof, it is entitled to the property herein described, or to the proceeds thereof, and prays that it may be afforded the relief herein grantable. Your petitioner further avers that the purchase money of said goods is wholly unpaid, and that your orator charges that said sale was made in the state of Mississippi, and is subject to the laws thereof in that behalf made and provided, and further respectfully represents that in pursuance of the statute in that behalf enacted that it is entitled to a lien for said purchase money of each of said vehicles upon each of said vehicles respectively, as shown by said Exhibit B hereto annexed. Wherefore, premises considered, petitioner prays that said matter may be considered by the court, and that said vehicles be set aside to it, or its lien established, and that the purchase money therefor be given, and that the discovery herein prayed for be made, and for such other, further, and general relief in equity and good conscience as may seem meet and proper, and as in duty bound,' etc.

(The petition was sworn to by the treasurer of the claimant.)

Exhibit A, referred to in the petition, is in the following words and figures, to wit: 'The F. A. Ames Company, of Owensboro, Kentucky, wholesale manufacturers of pleasure vehicles, shipped to J. B. Agnew, shipping point, Morton, Miss., when ship, Sept. 1st. Charge to . . . Rate . . . . Order No. 3115; Salesman, R. L. Buckett; Dated: 6/15 1908. Terms: 30 days net, or the buyer has the option of settling within 30 days from date of invoice by 1/3 60, 1/3 90, 1/3 120 days note or cash, less net per cent. f.o.b. cars or boat, Owensboro, Ky. Credit O.K. (Here follows the order in detail, as to number of vehicles, the description of same, price, etc.) All conditions and agreements with salesmen must be stipulated on this order; verbal contracts will not be recognized. It is expressly understood and agreed that all goods on hand and proceeds of all sales of goods received under this contract; also all goods hereinafter shipped to the maker of this contract, whether the proceeds are in notes, cash or book accounts, are to be held as collateral security in trust, and for the benefit of and subject to the order of the F. A. Ames Company, until full cash settlement has been made of our obligations due the said F. A. Ames Company. The title to, and ownership of all goods shipped under this contract shall remain vested in the F. A. Ames Company until the price thereof shall have been paid in cash, or until all notes given under this contract are paid; but nothing in this clause shall be considered a release from making payments as provided elsewhere in this contract. It is further understood and agreed that notes taken by the F. A. Ames Company in settlement are not accepted as payment but only as evidence of indebtedness. We further agree that a receipt from Transportation Company for goods delivered in good order shall be a release to the F. A. Ames Company, and agree to look to the Transportation Company for all losses occasioned by rubbing, chafing, or other damages which may occur to goods while in transit, or the non-delivery of any goods receipted for. It is further agreed that in case of death or financial embarrassment of the firm, or any member or individual making this contract, all accounts or notes for goods bought under this contract shall become immediately due and payable. Accepted subject to the approval of the F. A. Ames Company. (Signed) J. B. Agnew. All jobs will be shipped just as specified above. Be sure specifications are correct before signing.'

Exhibit B, referred to in said petition, is in words and figures as follows, to wit: 'Owensboro, Ky., Dec. 30th, 1908. Received of the F. A. Ames Company the following vehicles of their manufacture to be held by me as their property and sold for their account. All goods are to be settled for when sold by cash at the prices shown below or by customers' notes indorsed by me which are to be turned over to them for the full value of sales made, and when collected the excess over prices named below are to be returned to me. The goods are to be insured and stored by me without charge to them and sales reported as soon as made. ' Here follows a detailed list of vehicles.

The evidence developed that the purchaser had the right to sell the vehicles for any sum he desired over and above the amount of the purchase price. There was no regular accounting between vendor and vendee, but there were occasional remittances in the usual course of business. At the date of bankruptcy there were 10 vehicles on hand, which were taken into possession by the trustee, and where they now are. The petition above set forth was filed as indicated, and the court, after considering the matter, denied the relief prayed for by the F. A. Ames Company, and ordered the property sold. Claimants filed their petition for review within the 10 days in such cases, and the matter is now sent up for that purpose.

It will be seen by a reference to claimant's petition that it claims a lien for the purchase money-- a vendor's lien-- upon the vehicles in controversy. Section 3079, Code Miss 1906, is as follows: 'The vendor of personal property shall have a lien thereon for the purchase money while it remains in the hands of the first purchaser, or of one deriving title or possession through him with notice that the purchase money was unpaid. ' Sections 3080 and 3081 provide for the method of enforcing this lien, which is by suit, trial, and judgment. No action was taken by the petitioner to fix his lien before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. Certainly the petitioner cannot after the filing of the petition in bankruptcy enforce his lien for the purchase money for the vehicles in controversy. So that the petitioner must recover, if at all, in some other way. The schedules of the bankrupt, properly sworn to, show that there was no cash on hand, and the trustee in bankruptcy found none to take into his possession, nor was there any evidence, from an examination of the bankrupt, that there were any notes, accounts, or cash held in trust by the bankrupt for the petitioner. On the contrary, the evidence disclosed that the bankrupt intermingled these vehicles with his other stock in trade, and that he sold and transferred them in the usual course of business to purchasers thereof, and that he from time to time made remittances to the petitioner on account, the same as to any other creditors. There was no evidence of any accounting, or a demand for the same, between the petitioner and the bankrupt, neither was there any evidence that any demand had been made, nor has to this day by the petitioner upon the trustee in bankruptcy, for the possession of any notes, accounts, or cash claimed in the said petition to be a trust fund by reason of the sale of the said vehicles by Agnew. It is the law of Mississippi that where such funds are commingled with the other funds and assets of the debtor, that the trust is lost, and that the creditor cannot claim any such funds as a trust fund, because of such a commingling. Billingsley v. Pollock, 69 Miss. 759, 13 So. 828, 30 Am.St.Rep. 585; Shields v. Thomas, 71 Miss. 260, 14 So. 84, 42...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • In re Stewart
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York
    • April 14, 1910
  • Sherman & Sons v. United Clothing Stores
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • March 16, 1926
    ...188 Ala. 178, L. R. A. 1917B, 620; Arbuckle Bros. v. Kirkpatrick, 39 S.W. 3, 98 Tenn. 221, 36 L. R. A. 285, 60 Am. St. Rep. 854; In re Agnew (D. C.) 178 F. 478; In re Miller & Brown (D. C.) 135 F. Hotchkiss v. Higgins, 52 Conn. 205, 52 Am. Rep. 582; In re Wells (D. C.) 140 F. 752; Arbuckle ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT