IN RE AIR CRASH DISASTER AT FLA. EVERGLADES, DEC. 29, 1972
Decision Date | 28 June 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 139.,139. |
Parties | In re AIR CRASH DISASTER AT FLORIDA EVERGLADES ON DECEMBER 29, 1972. |
Court | Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation |
Before ALFRED P. MURRAH*, Chairman, and JOHN MINOR WISDOM, EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER*, JOSEPH S. LORD, III and STANLEY A. WEIGEL, Judges of the Panel.
On December 29, 1972, an Eastern Airlines jet en route from New York City to Miami, Florida, crashed in the Florida Everglades, fatally injuring 96 of the 161 passengers. At the present time, fourteen actions arising from the crash have been filed in the Southern District of Florida, nine in the Southern District of New York and three in the Eastern District of New York.
Defendants Eastern Airlines and Lockheed Aircraft Corporation have moved the Panel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for an order transferring these actions to either Florida or New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. All responding parties agree that transfer of these actions to a single district is in the best interests of all concerned, but disagree as to which district is the most appropriate transferee forum. We find that these actions involve substantial common questions of fact and that transfer of the New York actions to the Southern District of Florida will insure that duplication of common discovery is avoided, serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation.
We have generally assigned air crash litigation to the district in which the crash occurred, unless the facts of a particular litigation made another district more appropriate. See, e. g., In re Huntington, West Virginia, Air Disaster Litigation, 342 F.Supp. 1400 (Jud. Pan.Mult.Lit.1972); In re Denver, Colorado, Air Disaster Litigation, 339 F. Supp. 415 (Jud.Pan.Mult.Lit. 1972). There are no persuasive reasons for deviating from that general rule in this litigation. The crash occurred within the Southern District of Florida and the majority of the anticipated witnesses and relevant documents are located there. In addition, numerous actions have been filed in the Florida state courts and, through the cooperation of the parties and the state and federal court judges involved, discovery proceedings in the state court actions are being coordinated with the discovery in the Florida federal court actions. Transfer of all actions to the Southern District of Florida, therefore, will take advantage of this state-federal accommodation in discovery and will greatly enhance the expeditious processing of all actions arising out of the crash. Cf. In re Silver Plume, Colorado, Air Disaster Litigation, 352 F.Supp. 968, 969 (Jud. Pan.Mult.Lit.1972).
Anticipating the transfer of this litigation to Florida, certain New York counsel have requested that we order movants to reimburse them for reasonable travel expenses they will incur in connection with attending the pretrial proceedings in Florida. We deny the request on the ground that it is not within the scope of power conferred upon the Panel by 28 U.S.C. § 1407.
It is therefore ordered that the actions listed on the attached Schedule A be, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of Florida and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Peter T. Fay for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Accurso v. In-N-Out Burgers
...Rice Litigation) (8th Cir. 2014) 764 F.3d 864, 866; In re Air Crash Disaster at Florida Everglades on December 29, 1972 (J.P.M.L. 1973) 360 F.Supp. 1394, 1395. [30] E.g., In re Yahoo! Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation (N.D. Cal., July 22, 2020, No. 16-MD-02752-LHK) 2020 WL 42128......
-
Schieffelin & Co. v. United States
... ... 1057, (1972), argues that since the advertising allowance was ... ...
-
IN RE AIR CRASH DISASTER NEAR SAIGON, SOUTH VIETNAM, ON APRIL 4, 1975, 221.
...among the parties is the location of the appropriate transferee forum. See, e. g., In re Air Crash Disaster at Florida Everglades on December 29, 1972, 360 F.Supp. 1394 (Jud.Pan. Mult.Lit.1973). Lockheed suggests that the Northern District of Georgia is the appropriate transferee court beca......
-
In re US Financial Securities Litigation
... ... See In re Silver Plume, Colorado, Air Disaster Litigation, 352 F.Supp. 968, 969 t. 1972); cf. In re Florida Everglades Air Disaster ... ...