In re Albright

CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Colorado
Writing for the CourtBruce A. Campbell
CitationIn re Albright, 291 B.R. 538 (Bankr. Colo. 2003)
Decision Date04 April 2003
Docket NumberNo. 01-11367 ABC.,01-11367 ABC.
PartiesIn re Ashley ALBRIGHT, Debtor.

James H. Hahn, Greenwood Village, CO, for debtor.

Sally Zeman, Denver, CO, Chapter 13 Trustee.

Charles F. McVay, Denver, CO, for trustee.

OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO ALLOW TRUSTEE TO TAKE ANY AND ALL NECESSARY ACTIONS TO LIQUIDATE PROPERTY OWNED BY WESTERN BLUE SKY LLC

BRUCE A. CAMPBELL, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the (1) Motion to Allow Trustee to Take Any and All Necessary Actions to Liquidate Property Owned by Western Blue Sky LLC ("Motion to Liquidate"); (2) Motion to Appoint and Compensate Bob Karls as Real Estate Broker to the Trustee; and (3) Debtor's Response to Trustee's Motion to Retain Realtor and Liquidate LLC Property. Following a hearing on February 4, 2003, the parties agreed to submit the matter on briefs.

Ashley Albright, the debtor in this Chapter 7 case ("Debtor"), is the sole member and manager of a Colorado limited liability company named Western Blue Sky LLC.1 The LLC owns certain real property located in Saguache County, Colorado (the "Real Property"). The LLC is not a debtor in bankruptcy.

The Chapter 7 Trustee contends that because the Debtor was the sole member and manager of the LLC at the time she filed bankruptcy, he now controls the LLC and he may cause the LLC to sell the Real Property and distribute the net sales proceeds to his bankruptcy estate.2 The Debtor maintains that, at best, the Trustee is entitled to a charging order3 and cannot assume management of the LLC or cause the LLC to sell the Real Property.

Pursuant to the Colorado limited liability company statute, the Debtor's membership interest constitutes the personal property of the member. Upon the Debtor's bankruptcy filing, she effectively transferred her membership interest to the estate. See 11 U.S.C. § 541(a).4 Because there are no other members in the LLC, the entire membership interest passed to the bankruptcy estate, and the Trustee has become a "substituted member."5

Section 7-80-702 of the Limited Liability Company Act requires the unanimous consent of "other members" in order to allow a transferee to participate in the management of the LLC.6 Because there are no other members in the LLC, no written unanimous approval of the transfer was necessary. Consequently, the Debtor's bankruptcy filing effectively assigned her entire membership interest in the LLC to the bankruptcy estate, and the Trustee obtained all her rights, including the right to control the management of the LLC.7

The Debtor argues that the Trustee acts merely for her creditors and is only entitled to a charging order against distributions made on account of her LLC member interest.8 However, the charging order, as set forth in Section 703 of the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act, exists to protect other members of an LLC from having involuntarily to share governance responsibilities with someone they did not choose, or from having to accept a creditor of another member as a co-manager. A charging order protects the autonomy of the original members, and their ability to manage their own enterprise. In a single-member entity, there are no non-debtor members to protect. The charging order limitation serves no purpose in a single member limited liability company, because there are no other parties' interests affected.9

The Colorado limited liability company statute provides that the members, including the sole member of a single member limited liability company, have the power to elect and change managers.10 Because the Trustee became the sole member of Western Blue Sky LLC upon the Debtor's bankruptcy filing, the Trustee now controls, directly or indirectly, all governance of that entity, including decisions regarding liquidation of the entity's assets.

Because of the Court's ruling herein, the Debtor may be entitled to a claim for her contributions made to preserve an asset of this bankruptcy estate based on post-petition mortgage payments on the Real Property. The parties were asked to brief the issue, but the Debtor has not formally asserted such a claim. Therefore, the Court does not rule on the issue at this time.

Based on the foregoing, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the Trustee, as sole member, controls the Western Blue Sky LLC and may cause the LLC to sell its property and distribute net proceeds to his estate. Alternatively, the Trustee may elect to distribute the LLC's property to the bankruptcy estate, and, in turn, liquidate that property himself; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Trustee's Motion to appoint Bob Karls as real estate broker for the Trustee is hereby granted; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Debtor may file a claim, subject to objection in the regular course of this case, for her expenditures made to preserve an asset of this estate based on post-petition mortgage or other payments made by the Debtor.

1. The Debtor initiated this case on February 9, 2001, under Chapter 13. It was converted to Chapter 7 by the Debtor on July 19, 2001.

2. If the Trustee is entitled to control of the LLC, he could, presumably, as an alternative, dissolve the LLC, distribute its property to his bankruptcy estate, and then sell the property himself. The Trustee has not asserted any alter ego theory and has not attempted to pierce the veil of the LLC.

3. The Debtor further asserts that because the LLC is "non-profit" pursuant to its operating agreement, no distribution of "profit" will ever be made and thus the value of this interest is zero. This argument erroneously assumes that a member of a Colorado limited liability company's distribution rights are limited only to "profits." They are not. Colo.Rev.Stat. § 7-80-102(10)("Membership interest means a member's share of the profits and losses of a limited liability company and the right to receive distributions of such company's assets.") See also Colo.Rev.Stat. § 7-80-702(1).

4. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1) provides, in relevant part: "The commencement of a case ... creates an estate. Such estate is comprised of ... all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case."

5. Colo.Rev.Stat. § 7-80-702 provides (emphasis added):

(1) The interest of each member in a limited liability company constitutes the personal property of the member and may be transferred or assigned. However, if all of the other members of the limited liability company other than the member proposing to dispose of his or its interest do not approve of the proposed transfer or assignment by unanimous written consent, the transferee of the member's interest shall have no right to participate in the management of the business and affairs of the limited liability company or to become a member. The transferee shall only be entitled to receive the share of profits or other compensation by way of income and the return of contributions to which that member would otherwise be entitled.

(2) A substituted member is...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
52 cases
  • In re Dzierzawski
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • April 10, 2015
    ... ... one of the joint Chapter 7 debtors owned 100% of the membership interests in a limited liability company, the Chapter 7 trustee “was the only one entitled to manage [such limited liability company] and decide, inter alia, whether the LLC would or would not file bankruptcy”); In re Albright, 291 B.R. 538, 541 (Bankr.D.Colo.2003) (explaining that “[b]ecause the Trustee became the sole member of Western Blue Sky LLC upon the [d]ebtor's bankruptcy filing, the Trustee now 528 B.R. 411 controls, directly or indirectly, all governance of that entity, including decisions regarding ... ...
  • Weiss v. All Year Holdings Ltd. (In re All Year Holdings Ltd.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • October 4, 2022
    ... ... 18 See In re Modanlo , 412 B.R. 715 (Bankr. D. Md. 2006), aff'd , 266 Fed. Appx. 272 (4th Cir. 2008) ; In re Albright , 291 B.R. 538 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2003). 19 See In re Dixie Mgmt. & Inv., Ltd. Partners , 474 B.R. 698, 701 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 2011) (holding same regarding Arkansas statute and clause in operating agreement, and noting that debtor was "permitted the use and benefit of its interest in the LLC ... ...
  • In re Mulder
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • April 7, 2004
    ... ... But Baker has neither pleaded nor proved that Mulder owned an interest in North 26th Land, LLC. Even if Mulder owned such an interest, only that interest would be property of the bankruptcy estate. In re Albright, 291 B.R. 538, 540 (Bankr.D.Colo.2003). Property belonging to the limited liability company itself would not. Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rodio (In re Rodio), 257 B.R. 699, 701 (Bankr.D.Conn.2001); see also 805 ILCS 180/30-1(a)(2002) ("A member is not a co-owner of, and has no transferable ... ...
  • Nw. Wholesale, Inc. v. Pac Organic Fruit, LLC
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • September 10, 2015
    ... ... 10 While Garrison–Ashburn has been criticized by some subsequent cases, see, e.g., In re Klingerman, 388 B.R. 677, 679 (Bankr.E.D.N.C.2008), other cases agree with Garrison–Ashburn's approach. For instance, In re Albright, 291 B.R. 538, 540 n. 7 (Bankr.D.Colo.2003), observed: Where a single member files bankruptcy while the other members of a multi-member LLC do not, ... the bankruptcy estate is only entitled to receive the share of profits or other compensation by way of income and the return of the contributions ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Charging Orders
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • July 25, 2017
    ...creditor’s rights with respect to a judgment debtor’s freely alienable membership interest in a single-member LLC”); In re Albright, 291 B.R. 538, 540 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2003) (holding that, “[b]ecause there are no other members in the LLC, . . . the Debtor’s bankruptcy filing effectively ass......
  • Nevada Expands Debtor Protections for Members of Limited Liability Companies
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 6, 2012
    ...to determine the applicable parameters of the charging order remedy against partnership entities. [back] [2] See In re Ashley Albright, 291 B.R. 538 (Bankr. D. Colorado, 2003). [back] [3] Olmstead v. Fed. Trade Comm’n, 44 So. 3d 76, 83 (2010). [back] [4] Alan S. Gassman, Christopher J. Deni......
16 books & journal articles
  • Are the courts developing a unique theory of limited liability companies or simply borrowing from other forms?
    • United States
    • Suffolk University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 3, June 2009
    • June 22, 2009
    ...In the single-member LLC context, courts have been confronted with the tension between these provisions and a single-owner entity. In In re Albright, (111) the sole member of a Colorado LLC filed bankruptcy, and the court held that the Chapter (7) trustee became a "substituted member" and c......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Partnership and Limited Liability Company Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...Am. Bar Ass'n, 542 F.2d 56 (8th Cir. 1976): 27.3(3) TC-8 BANKRUPTCY COURTS ____________________________________________ Albright, In re, 291 B.R. 538 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2003): 27.9 Auboussie Bros. Constr. Co., In re, 8 B.R. 302 (E.D. Mo. 1981): 27.2 Baldwin, In re, EO-05-114, BANKR. 04-72919,......
  • Operations
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books The Limited Liability Company - Volume 1-2 Volume 1
    • April 1, 2022
    ...Foreign Forms/Word Forms in Digital Access and click on the desired form number. In the case of a single-member LLC, see In re Albright , 291 B.R. 538 (2003), in which the bankruptcy court allowed the creditor of the single member to attach the assets of the LLC, thereby effectively piercin......
  • Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Private Placement Life Insurance & Other Advanced Asset Protection Strategies - with Forms & Diagrams Part II. Other advanced asset protection strategies
    • April 28, 2022
    ...members to protect. Therefore, it has been held that the charging order limitation serves no purpose. [See In re Ashley Albright , 291 B.R. 538 (Bankr. D. Colo. 2003) (stating that the result would be different if there had been non-debtor members in the LLC).] Therefore, one-person LLCs ca......
  • Get Started for Free