In re Allen

Decision Date11 September 1899
Docket Number2,888.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of California
PartiesIn re ALLEN.

L. T Hatfield, for creditor.

Wm. P Johnson, for bankrupt.

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

The Sullivan Kelley Company presented its claim to the referee in the sum of $106.45 on account of costs incurred by it as plaintiff in an attachment suit pending against the bankrupt at the date of the adjudication, and commenced within four months prior to the date of filing the petition in bankruptcy, and asked that the same might be allowed and paid in full as a debt entitled to priority of payment out of the proceeds arising from the sale of the property attached. A portion of this claim-- $34.38-- was for costs which accrued prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, and included storage and fees of keeper of the attached property up to that date, and the balance of $72.07 was for fees of keeper and other expenses in relation to the property subsequent thereto and prior to the qualification of the trustee. The referee disallowed that portion of the claim relating to costs, storage, and fees of keeper incurred prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy, and allowed only $45.07 for fees of keeper and other expenses on account of the property subsequent to that date. The ruling of the referee in relation to each portion of the claim was excepted to by the Sullivan-Kelley Company, and is now before the court for review.

1. The referee erred in refusing to allow that portion of the claim which included the costs incurred in the attachment suit prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. Under subdivision 3 of section 63 of the bankruptcy act, 'a claim for taxable costs incurred in good faith by a creditor before the filing of the petition in an action to recover a provable debt' may be proved and allowed as a debt against the bankrupt, but is not entitled to priority of payment over unsecured claims. The debts entitled to priority of payment are enumerated in section 64 of the same act, and a claim for costs incurred by a creditor in attachment proceedings prior to the adjudication in bankruptcy is not included; nor is the claim for such costs a lien upon the proceeds arising from the trustee's sale of the attached property. It is true that under the laws of the state of California, the Sullivan-Kelley Company acquired a lien upon the property attached in its suit against the bankrupt for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • In re Bennett
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • March 12, 1907
    ...state statutes, are not sound. They cite to support their view Randolph v. Scruggs, 190 U.S. 533, 23 Sup.Ct. 710, 47 L.Ed. 1165, In re Allen (D.C.) 96 F. 512, In Young (D.C.) 96 F. 606, and In re Beaver Coal Co. (D.C.) 107 F. 98. The claim for a lien for professional services denied in Rand......
  • Gerber & Co. Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of Bridgeport
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1930
    ...Co., 142 A.D. 313, 126 N.Y.S. 1046, 25 A. B. R. 672, 677; Edison Ill. Co. v. Tibbetts (C. C. A.) 241 F. 468, 39 A. B. R. 640; In re Allen (D. C.) 96 F. 512; State Bank of Chicago v. Cox (C. C. A.) 143 F. 93; Toof v. City National Bank (C. C. A.) 206 F. 250; 7 Corpus Juris, p. 90. The filing......
  • In re Whitley
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Tennessee
    • November 15, 1924
    ...519, affirming (D. C.) 6 Am. Bankr. Rep. 404, 107 F. 98; In re Young (D. C. N. Y.) 2 Am. Bankr. Rep. 673, 96 F. 606; In re Allen (D. C. Cal.) 3 Am. Bankr. Rep. 38, 96 F. 512; Matter of Moncrief Mfg. Co. (Ref. R. I.) 31 Am. Bankr. Rep. 674; Matter of Hessler Foundry & Mfg. Co. (D. C. N. Y.) ......
  • In re Daniels
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island
    • September 13, 1901
    ... ... that there is no provision in the bankruptcy law whereby ... costs incurred by a creditor in an action to recover a debt ... prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy can be ... allowed priority of payment. In re Beaver Coal Co., 5 ... Am.Bankr.R. 787, 107 F. 98; In re Allen (D.C.) ... 96 F. 512; In re Young (D.C.) 96 F. 606,-- seem to ... support this contention. The decision of Judge Lowell in ... Re Lewis (D.C.) 99 F. 935, however, is to the ... contrary. In that case priorities for costs given by the ... state insolvency law were held to be recognized by the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT