In re AMR Corp.

Decision Date15 August 2012
Docket NumberNo. 11–15463 (SHL).,11–15463 (SHL).
Citation477 B.R. 384
PartiesIn re AMR CORPORATION, et al., Debtors.
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Steptoe & Johnson LLP, By: Filiberto Agusti, Esq., Joshua Robert Taylor, Esq., Washington, D.C., for the Allied Pilots Association.

James & Hoffman, P.C., By: Edgar N. James, Esq., Kathy L. Krieger, Esq., David P. Dean, Esq., Darin M. Dalmat, Esq., Daniel M. Rosenthal, Esq., Washington, D.C., for the Allied Pilots Association.

Guerrieri, Clayman, Bartos & Parcelli, P.C., By: Robert S. Clayman, Esq., Jeffrey A. Bartos, Esq., Carmen R. Parcelli, Esq., Paul E. Knupp III, Esq., N. Skelly Harper, Esq., Washington, D.C., for the Association of Professional Flight Attendants.

Lowenstein Sandler PC, By: Sharon L. Levine, Esq., John K. Sherwood, Esq., S. Jason Teele, Esq., Paul Kizel, Esq., Tania Ingman, Esq., Roseland, NJ, for the Transport Workers Union of America, AFL–CIO.

Paul Hastings LLP, By: John J. Gallagher, Esq., Neal D. Mollen, Esq., Scott M. Flicker, Esq., Margaret H. Spurlin, Esq., Washington, D.C., Mark D. Pollack, Esq., Jon A. Geier, Esq., Kenneth W. Gage, Esq., Chicago, IL, Stephen H. Harris, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, Todd C. Duffield, Esq., New York, NY, Erika L. Leonard, Esq., Atlanta, GA, Weil, Gotshal & Manges

LLP, By: Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Stephen Karotkin, Esq., Alfredo R. Pérez, Esq., Stephen A. Youngman, Esq., Lawrence J. Baer, Esq., New York, NY, for the Debtors.

Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, By: Jay M. Goffman, Esq., New York, NY, John Wm. Butler, Jr., Esq., Al Hogan, Esq., Chicago, IL, for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

Seham, Seham, Meltz & Petersen LLP, By: Lucas K. Middlebrook, Esq., White Plains, NY, Nicholas P. Granath, Esq., Minneapolis, MN, for the American Independent Cockpit Alliance, Inc. and the Supplement B Pilot Beneficiaries.

SNR Denton US, LLP, By: Carole Neville, Esq., Fruman Jacobson, Esq., Gary Meyerhoff, Esq., New York, NY, for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

SEAN H. LANE, Bankruptcy Judge.

+-------------------+
                ¦TABLE OF CONTENTS  ¦
                +-------------------+
                
+----------------------------------+
                ¦                              ¦   ¦
                +------------------------------+---¦
                ¦BACKGROUND                    ¦395¦
                +----------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦   ¦                                                              ¦       ¦
                +-+---+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦ ¦I. ¦AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. AND ITS OPERATIONS                    ¦395    ¦
                +-+---+--------------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦ ¦II.¦DEVELOPMENTS IN THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY                          ¦396    ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦  ¦  ¦A.  ¦Domestic Deregulation and the Entry of Low Cost Carriers¦396   ¦
                +--+--+----+--------------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦  ¦  ¦B.  ¦International Deregulation                              ¦397   ¦
                +--+--+----+--------------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦  ¦  ¦C.  ¦External Shocks to the Airline Industry                 ¦397   ¦
                +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦III.¦THE DECLINE OF AMERICAN                                      ¦397    ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦  ¦A. ¦Increased Price and Service Competition             ¦398   ¦
                +-+--+---+----------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦B. ¦American's High Labor Costs and Productivity Issues ¦399   ¦
                +-+--+---+----------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦C. ¦Mergers and Restructurings of Other Carriers        ¦400   ¦
                +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦IV.¦RECENT DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING AMERICAN                        ¦401    ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------+
                ¦                              ¦   ¦
                +------------------------------+---¦
                ¦DISCUSSION                    ¦405¦
                +----------------------------------+
                
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦  ¦                                                      ¦      ¦
                +-+--+------------------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦I.¦THE STANDARD UNDER SECTION 1113                       ¦405   ¦
                +------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦  ¦A.  ¦Necessity                                                 ¦407    ¦
                +-+--+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦B.  ¦Fair and Equitable Treatment                              ¦408    ¦
                +-+--+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦C.  ¦Complete Information and Information Necessary to Evaluate¦409    ¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦    ¦the Proposal                                              ¦       ¦
                +-+--+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦D.  ¦Good Faith/Good Cause                                     ¦409    ¦
                +-+--+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦E.  ¦Balance of the Equities                                   ¦410    ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦II.¦EVALUATION OF AMERICAN'S PROPOSAL TO THE APA                  ¦410    ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦ ¦A.¦Necessary for Reorganization   ¦411¦
                +------------------------------------------+
                
+---------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦1.¦Blanket Objections to American's Motion¦411  ¦
                +---------------------------------------------------------+
                
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦a)¦Potential Merger with U.S. Airways           ¦411   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦b)¦Objections to the Business Plan              ¦416   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦c)¦Convergence                                  ¦422   ¦
                +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦  ¦  ¦    ¦2. ¦Objection to Proposed Changes in Benefits to All     ¦423   ¦
                ¦  ¦  ¦    ¦   ¦Employees                                            ¦      ¦
                +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦a)¦Pension Plans                                ¦423   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦b)¦Medical Costs Generally                      ¦424   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦c)¦Active Medical                               ¦424   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦d)¦Retiree Medical                              ¦425   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦e)¦Objections to Proposed Benefit Changes       ¦425   ¦
                +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦  ¦  ¦    ¦3. ¦Objections To Proposed Changes Relevant Only to the  ¦427   ¦
                ¦  ¦  ¦    ¦   ¦Pilots                                               ¦      ¦
                +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦a)¦Regional Jets                                ¦427   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦b)¦Codesharing                                  ¦431   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦c)¦Furlough                                     ¦434   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦d)¦Schedule Maximum                             ¦435   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦e)¦Sick Leave                                   ¦435   ¦
                +-+--+---+---+--+---------------------------------------------+------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦   ¦   ¦f)¦Valuation of Proposal                        ¦436   ¦
                +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦ ¦  ¦B.  ¦Fair and Equitable Treatment                              ¦437    ¦
                +-+--+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦C.  ¦Complete and Reliable Information/Information Necessary to¦439    ¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦    ¦Evaluate the Proposal                                     ¦       ¦
                +-+--+----+----------------------------------------------------------+-------¦
                ¦ ¦  ¦D.  ¦Good Faith Negotiations/Good Cause to Refuse the Proposal ¦443    ¦
                +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
                ¦  ¦  ¦    ¦1. ¦Criticism that American Failed to
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • In re Patriot Coal Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • 29. Mai 2013
  • In re Mission Coal Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • 1. März 2019
    ... ... to the Debtor's liquidation." 52 This factor is the most debated among the nine American Provision factors, and its interpretation now exists in two divergent forms: the "absolutely essential" view espoused by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp ... v. United Steelworkers of America , 53 and the "necessary, but not Page 40 absolutely minimal" view formulated by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Truck Drivers Local 807 , Int'l Bhd ... of Teamsters v ... Carey Transportation , Inc ... 54 93. In Wheeling-Pittsburgh , the Third ... ...
  • Krakowski v. Am. Airlines, Inc. (In re Amr Corp.)
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • 3. September 2015
  • United Mine Workers of Am. 1974 Pension Plan & Trust v. Walter Energy, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • 18. Mai 2016
    ... ... Id. at 9701(c), 9711(g), 9712(d)(2)(4). If these funding schemes prove insufficient, Congress has created means for addressing shortfalls in Coal Act Funds premiums to be paid. See U.S. Steel Corp. v. Astrue , 495 F.3d 1272, 127677 (11th Cir.2007) (explaining statutory backstop for retirees under Combined Fund); 26 U.S.C. 9712 (allowing for transfer of moneys from other statutorily created Funds). Congress designed the Coal Act to protect against the "chance of the miners being denied ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 2 Valuation of Collateral
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Institute How Secure Are You? Secured Creditors in Commercial and Consumer Bankruptcies
    • Invalid date
    ...In re Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd., 513 B.R. 233, 242 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) ("Valuation is not an exact science."); In re AMR Corp., 477 B.R. 384, 436-37 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) ("Valuation ... is far from an exact science."); In re Spansion Inc., 426, 144, 130 (Bankr. D. Del. 2010) ("Entity valu......
  • CHAPTER 1 STRATEGIC PATHS FOR ENERGY COMPANIES IN DISTRESS
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Bankruptcy and Financial Distress in the Oil and Gas Industry Legal Problems and Solutions (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...Bankr. Dev. J. 91, 92 (2016).[19] In re Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd., 513 B.R. 233, 242 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) (citing In re AMR Corp., 477 B.R. 384, 436-37 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)).[20] O&S Trucking, Inc. v. Mercedes Benz Fin. Servs. USA (In re O&S Trucking, Inc.), 529 B.R. 711, 717 (B.A.P. 8th C......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT