In re Annessa J.
| Decision Date | 14 September 2021 |
| Citation | 338 Conn. 905,258 A.3d 675 (Mem) |
| Parties | IN RE ANNESSA J. |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Evan O'Roark, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition.
Albert J. Oneto IV, assigned counsel, in opposition.
The petition of the Commissioner of Children and Families for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 206 Conn. App. 572, ––– A.3d –––– (2021), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly expand the standard set forth in In re Ava W. , 336 Conn. 545, 248 A.3d 675 (2020), for deciding motions for post-termination visitation beyond the question of whether, under General Statutes § 46b-121 (b) (1), such visitation is ‘necessary or appropriate’ to secure the welfare of the child?"
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
In re Annessa J.
...under ... § 46b-121 (b) (1), such visitation is ‘necessary or appropriate’ to secure the welfare of the child?" In re Annessa J. , 338 Conn. 905, 258 A.3d 675 (2021). We address each of these three claims in turn. Additional facts and procedural history will be set forth as necessary. IWe b......
-
In re Lucia C.
...In re Annessa J. , 206 Conn. App. 572, 584–88, 260 A.3d 1253, cert. granted, 338 Conn. 904, 258 A.3d 674 (2021), cert. granted, 338 Conn. 905, 258 A.3d 675 (2021), and cert. granted, 338 Conn. 906, 258 A.3d 90 (2021). Although we note that our Supreme Court has granted certification to appe......