In re: Anthony Tyson v. State
Decision Date | 01 October 2000 |
Citation | 784 So.2d 357 |
Parties | (Ala. 2000) Ex Parte Anthony Tyson (In re: Anthony Tyson v. State) 1991309 |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
(Macon Circuit Court, CC-97-54; Court of Criminal Appeals, CR-98-0267)
Anthony Tyson was convicted of capital murder for the deaths of Derek Cowan and Damien Thompson. Tyson was convicted of two counts under § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala. Code 1975 -- murder committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree -- and of one count under § 13A-5-40(a)(10) -- the murder of two or more people during one act or pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct. By a vote of 10-2, the jury recommended that Tyson be sentenced to death. The trial court followed the jury's recommendation and sentenced Tyson to death by electrocution. In a unanimous decision, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Tyson's conviction and sentence. Tyson v. State, [CR-98-0267, February 4, 2000] ___ So. 2d ___ (Ala. Crim. App. 2000). We granted certiorari review, pursuant to Rule 39(c), Ala. R. App. P.1 We affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Tyson has raised 13 issues for our review. The Court of Criminal Appeals fully addressed and correctly resolved each of these issues in its thorough and well-researched opinion. Only four of those issues warrant further discussion. Three of them question the validity of the search warrant; the final issue challenges limitations the trial court placed on Tyson's cross-examination of the prosecution's expert witness on DNA evidence.
On January 4, 1997, Porter Key was driving on Franklin Road in Macon County when he discovered Cowan's body in the middle of the road. Key said he had to drive off the road to avoid the body. He said that he saw a green Acura automobile roll off the road and strike a fence, and that the car then backed up onto the road and sped off in the direction of Tuskegee. Key said he thought the driver of this car had been involved in a hit-and-run accident, so, he said, he chased the car in an attempt to get the license-plate number. He was unable to keep up and lost the car somewhere in Tuskegee. Later, law-enforcement personnel discovered that Cowan had not been the victim of a hit-and-run accident, but had been shot twice in the back of the head.
Within minutes after Key discovered Cowan's body, Thompson's body was discovered slumped forward on the passenger side of an Acura automobile that was in the bushes at an intersection in Tuskegee. The keys were in the car and it was still running. Thompson had also been shot twice in the head.
Alphonso Cardwell testified that he and Cowan had been scheduled to meet for a drug exchange on a dirt road off County Road 36 on January 4, 1997. He testified that as he was driving to the designated location he saw Cowan, Thompson, and a third male, whom he identified at trial as Anthony Tyson, drive by in a green Acura. The Acura was being followed, he said, by another vehicle, driven by Cornelius "D'Rock" Drisker. Cardwell testified that when he arrived at the location of the planned exchange, he gave Cowan $300 in exchange for cocaine. Minutes later, Cowan's body was discovered. Witnesses testified that one of his pockets was turned inside out. The $300 was missing.
Police connected Tyson to the murders while investigating a shooting in Union Springs that occurred 10 days after the double murder in Macon County. Nicholas Martin testified that Tyson and three other people shot at him from a car as he was walking his dog. He testified that he recognized Tyson and that he went to the police station and signed a warrant for Tyson's arrest.2 Law-enforcement authorities later determined that the gun identified as the weapon used in the Union Springs shooting was the same weapon used in the murder of Cowan and Thompson.
Substantial forensic evidence connected Tyson to the double murder. After executing a search warrant, based on evidence obtained in the investigation of the Union Springs shooting, the police recovered from Tyson's apartment a Lorcin chrome .380 pistol and blood-stained sneakers. A DNA analysis of the blood on the sneakers showed that the blood matched Thompson's blood. Police recovered Tyson's fingerprints from the green Acura. Spent shell casings recovered from the Acura, from near Cowan's body, and from the Union Springs shooting were identified as having been fired by the same gun, a Lorcin .380, which was identified as belonging to Tyson.
Tyson's defense at trial was that he did not kill Cowan and Thompson. He attempted to show that another person could have committed the murders, specifically, the man who had been seen in a car with the victims earlier on the day of the murders.
Tyson argues that evidence seized from his apartment should have been suppressed because, he says, the search warrant was not based on sufficient probable cause, listed the wrong address, and did not authorize a nighttime search. The affidavit in support of the search warrant reads:
based on sufficient probable cause.
When reviewing the question whether officers had probable cause, this Court has stated:
""
Crittenden v. State, 476 So. 2d 632, 633-34 (Ala. 1985) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 239 (1983) (emphasis omitted)). The affidavit supporting the warrant in this case presents significant information, not merely conclusory statements "that [give] the magistrate virtually no basis at all for making a judgment regarding probable cause." Id. at 633. Agent Smith's affidavit provides a detailed description of the investigation leading to his belief that the weapon used in the Union Springs shooting would be found at Tyson's...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Billups v. State, No. CR-05-1767 (Ala. Crim. App. 11/13/2009)
...1985); Johnson v. State, 820 So. 2d 842, 861 (Ala. Crim. App. 2000); Tyson v. State, 784 So. 2d 328, 344 (Ala. Crim. App.), aff'd, 784 So. 2d 357 (Ala. 2000). `Under the identity exception to the general exclusionary rule prohibiting the admission of other or collateral crimes as substantiv......
-
Wilson v. State
...the circuit court failed to instruct the jury otherwise. “As we stated in Tyson v. State, 784 So.2d 328 (Ala.Crim.App.), aff'd, 784 So.2d 357 (Ala.2000): “ ‘The appellate courts of this state have consistently held, since the United States Supreme Court's decision in Mills [ v. Maryland, 48......
-
EX PARTE TYSON
... 784 So.2d 357 Ex parte Anthony TYSON ... (In re Anthony Tyson v. State) ... 1991309 ... Supreme Court of Alabama ... November 17, 2000 ... 784 So.2d ... ...