IN RE APPLICATION OF NIELSON, Civ. 69-17S.

Decision Date23 July 1969
Docket NumberCiv. 69-17S.
Citation301 F. Supp. 726
PartiesIn the Matter of APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus of Raymond C. NIELSON.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of South Dakota

Robert J. Parker, Sioux Falls, S. D., for petitioner.

Roger A. Schaiger, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Sioux Falls, S. D., for State of South Dakota.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

NICHOL, Chief Judge.

This is a ruling on an application of Raymond Nielson for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254. A full evidentiary hearing was held on June 13, 1969.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The petitioner, Raymond Nielson, is a citizen of the United States, and is presently imprisoned and restrained of his liberty and detained under color of authority of the State of South Dakota, in the custody of Don R. Erickson, Warden of the South Dakota Penitentiary at Sioux Falls, South Dakota, in this district.

2. The claim and authority by which the petitioner is restrained of his liberty is a Judgment and Sentence of the Circuit Court in and for the County of Brookings, South Dakota, rendered on October 30, 1967.

3. In addition to numerous other appeals and petitions attempted pro se by the petitioner, one of which was an original writ of habeas corpus filed in the South Dakota Supreme Court and denied by that Court on May 1, 1968, petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court for the Second Judicial Circuit and a hearing was held before the Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, Circuit Court Judge for the Second Judicial Circuit in the Courthouse in Sioux Falls, Minnehaha County, South Dakota on December 11, 1968. At this hearing, petitioner agreed to the assistance of counsel for the subsequent pursuance of State-Court remedies and requested that Mr. Frank Denholm of Brookings, South Dakota be appointed to pursue petitioner's case. Mr. Denholm was subsequently requested to assist petitioner. In a decision dated December 17, 1968, petitioner's writ of habeas corpus brought in the Circuit Court in the Second Judicial Circuit was quashed.

4. By letter, dated May 12, 1969, sent to the Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, Circuit Court Judge for the Second Judicial Circuit, petitioner advised Judge Bogue that petitioner was abandoning his State-Court remedies by foregoing the services of his appointed attorney Mr. Frank Denholm, and that petitioner was resorting to Federal remedies and had filed the present writ of habeas corpus in this Court. At the time that petitioner wrote the letter of May 12, 1969, to Judge Bogue, petitioner had not appealed to the South Dakota Supreme Court from the adverse decision on his writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court for the Second Judicial Circuit and has yet to do so.

5. By failing to appeal the adverse decision rendered by the Circuit Court for the Second Judicial Circuit, petitioner has presently not exhausted his State-Court remedies, and in the opinion of this Court, this constitutes a deliberate by-pass of appellate review of Judge Bogue's decision.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The South Dakota Supreme Court will not rule on the merits of an original writ of habeas corpus except for prerogative...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Application of Nielson, 19979.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 4 Agosto 1970
    ...application without prejudice upon a finding that Nielson had not exhausted his state remedies. Judge Nichol's memorandum is reported at 301 F.Supp. 726. There is no dispute as to the facts with regard to the issue of exhaustion of state remedies. Nielson filed pro se an original writ of ha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT