In re Arkell, Bar Docket No. 22161

Decision Date07 July 2016
Docket NumberBar Docket No. 22161
PartiesIn the Matter of Daniel J. Arkell, Respondent.
CourtKansas Supreme Court
ORDER OF DISBARMENT

In a letter signed June 30, 2016, addressed to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Daniel J. Arkell, an attorney admitted to practice law in Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217

(2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 390).

At the time the respondent surrendered his license, five complaints had been docketed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator for investigation. The complaints alleged that the respondent violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1

(2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 442) (competence); 1.7 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 519) (conflicts of interest); 3.3 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 601) (candor to the tribunal); 4.4 (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 632) (transaction with persons other than clients); and 8.4(b), (c), (d), and (g) (2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 672) (misconduct).

This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of the respondent's license should be accepted and that the respondent should be disbarred.

It Is Therefore Ordered that Daniel J. Arkell be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Daniel J. Arkell from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent, and that the respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218

(2015 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 401).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. Smith
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • August 5, 2016
  • In re D.H.
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • August 4, 2017
    ...hearing.The Kansas Supreme Court disbarred Arkell–Roca from the practice of law in Kansas on July 7, 2016. See In re Arkell, 304 Kan. 754, 377 P.3d 414 (2016).When it addressed this issue, the district court found that Arkell–Roca's representation was by definition below the standard of rep......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT