In re Barnes, 99-30869.
Decision Date | 06 June 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 99-30869.,99-30869. |
Citation | 264 BR 415 |
Parties | In re Maralyn A. BARNES, Debtor. |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Michigan |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Paul A. Pianto, Owosso, MI, for Debtor.
Collene K. Corcoran, Bingham Farms, MI, Chapter 7 Trustee.
Subsequent Opinion Regarding Debtor's TIAA Account June 6, 2001.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND OPINION REGARDING OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION IN DEBTOR'S TIAA AND CREF ACCOUNTS
This contested matter arose upon the filing of an objection by Colleen Corcoran, the chapter 7 trustee, to the Debtor's claim that her interest in certain annuity contracts was exempt. Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 52(a) (incorporated by F.R.Bankr.P. 9014 and 7052), the Court now issues its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. For the reasons set forth hereafter, the Court holds that only one of the two interests at issue constitutes property of the bankruptcy estate. The trustee's objection to the non-estate interest will therefore be dismissed as moot. With respect to the estate interest, a hearing will be set to determine the validity of the trustee's objection.
(1) The Debtor is an employee of Michigan State University ("MSU").
(2) As such, she was required to enroll in MSU's "Base Retirement Plan" (the "Plan"). Exhibit 1 (a copy of the Plan).
(3) The Debtor participated in the Plan through the purchase of two annuity contracts, one issued by the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America ("TIAA"), and the other issued by the College Retirement Equities Fund ("CREF"). Exhibits A ("Retirement Annuity Contract" (TIAA)) and B ("Retirement Unit-Annuity Certificate" (CREF)).
(4) The premiums for the annuity contracts are paid by MSU, with the cost thereof defrayed by a 5% reduction of the Debtor's salary. Exhibit 1 at p. 6.
(5) For purposes of this litigation, the Court assumes that the Plan and annuity contracts meet the requirements of 26 U.S.C. § 403(b)(1). Testimony of Sherry Smalley Van Kampen, C.E.B.S. (Ms. Van Kampen, who is employed as a Human Resource Analyst in the Benefits Retirement Office of MSU's Human Resources Department, described the benefit program in which the Debtor participates as a "403(b) Plan."); Exhibit 4 (CREF Prospectus), at p. 46 (); Exhibit 5 (TIAA Real Estate Account Prospectus), at p. 50 (); Exhibit 1 at p. 6 (); 26 U.S.C. § 403(b)(1) ").
(6) Pursuant to the Plan, the Debtor may obtain annuity distributions only if one of the following circumstances applies: "i attainment of age 59½; ii disability; iii death; iv financial hardship, such as purchase of a principal residence; to avoid eviction from home; college tuition for self, spouse or dependent; funeral expenses; medical expenses; v loans. . . ." Exhibit 1 at p. 11. See also Exhibit C ("Changes Made to MSU's Base Retirement Plan") at p. 1; compare 26 U.S.C. § 403(b)(11) ( ).
(7) Under the terms of the Plan, the amount which a participant may borrow from TIAA/CREF1 cannot exceed the lesser of (i) $50,000; (ii) 45% of combined TIAA and CREF accumulations; or (iii) 90% of CREF accumulations. Exhibit C at pp. 1 & 6; Testimony of Sherry Smalley Van Kampen, C.E.B.S. Compare 26 U.S.C. § 72(p)(1)(A) () with 26 U.S.C. § 72(p)(2)(A)(i) ( ). By these criteria, the Debtor was eligible to obtain a $50,000 loan. Testimony of Sherry Smalley Van Kampen, C.E.B.S.
(8) The Plan requires that a loan from TIAA/CREF "for the purchase of a primary residence" be repaid within 10 years. Exhibit C at p. 6. A loan for any other purpose must be repaid within 5 years. See id. Compare 26 U.S.C. § 72(p)(2)(B)(i) ( ) with 26 U.S.C. § 72(p)(2)(B)(ii) ( ).
(9) The Plan states that the "amount of any default in repayment of the loan will be reported to the IRS as ordinary income." Exhibit C at p. 6. If the borrower is less than 59 and ½ years of age, the default may also be treated as an "early distribution." Id.
(10) Each annuity contract provides that its "validity and effect . . . are governed by the laws" of the State of New York. Exhibits A and B at p. 3.
(11) The TIAA contract states that "any assignment, pledge, or transfer of ownership, by the Annuitant i.e., the Debtor . . . of this contract or of any benefits hereunder will be void and of no effect." Exhibit A at ¶ 15. The contract provides further that Id. at ¶ 17.
(12) The CREF contract states that "any assignment, pledge, or transfer of ownership, by the Annuitant2 . . . of this certificate or of any benefits hereunder will be void and of no effect." Exhibit B at ¶ 15. The contract contains another provision which states: "Benefits under this certificate are protected by the following clause contained in the statute of the State of New York establishing CREF:
`No money or other benefit provided or rendered by the corporation hereby formed, nor any rights or interests of any participating person in any benefit provided by said corporation, . . . shall be subject to assignment or pledge, or be liable to attachment, garnishment, or other process, or to be seized, taken, appropriated, or applied by any legal or equitable process or operation of law to pay any debt or liability of any such person. . . . \'"
Id. at ¶ 16 (quoting 1952 N.Y. Laws ch. 124, § 9).
(13) The Debtor filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy relief on April 19, 1999.
(14) The Debtor claimed that her interest in the annuity contracts is fully exempt pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(10)(E). See Debtor's Schedule C.
(15) The trustee timely filed an objection to this claim of exemption. The objection is based on her contention that "not all of the funds in the retirement annuity are reasonably necessary for the Debtor's continued support." Brief in Support of Trustee's Objection at p. 2. See 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(10)(E) .
(16) In response to the trustee's objection, the Debtor asserted that her interest in the annuity contracts is excluded from the bankruptcy estate by operation of 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2).
(1) Neither party arguing to the contrary, the Court assumes that the validity of the contracts is to be determined by New York law. See, e.g., Richardson v. TIAA/CREF, 123 B.R. 540, 542 (E.D.N.C. 1991) ( ); In re Montgomery, 104 B.R. 112, 115 (Bankr.N.D.Iowa 1989) ( ); see generally In re Portnoy, 201 B.R. 685, 697 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1996) ().
(2) For present purposes, the Court accepts as true the trustee's unchallenged assertion that the Plan is a "governmental plan" within the meaning of § 1002(32) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. ("ERISA"). See Trustee's Brief at p. 3 ( ); cf. In re Lyons, 148 B.R. 88, 93 n. 6 (Bankr.D.D.C.1992) ( ); see generally 29 U.S.C. § 1002(32) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sec. 403(b) annuity included in bankruptcy estate.
...Quinn, 299 BR 450 (Bankr.WD MI 2003) (concluding that the debtor's interest in a Sec. 403(b) annuity was not excluded); and In re Barnes, 264 BR 415, 421 (Bankr. ED MI 2001) (discussing the "mast" requirement at length and concluding that "[section] 541 (c)(2) applies only to trust Thus, th......