In re Bayou Group, LLC

Decision Date16 October 2008
Docket NumberAdversary No. 06-08435A.,Adversary No. 06-08332A.,Adversary No. 06-08403A.,Adversary No. 06-08494A.,Adversary No. 06-08320A.,Adversary No. 06-08422A.,Bankruptcy No. 06 B 22306(ASH).,Adversary No. 06-08318A.,Adversary No. 06-08333A.,Adversary No. 06-08336A.,Adversary No. 06-08493A.,Adversary No. 06-08321A.,Adversary No. 07-08243A.,Adversary No. 06-08329A.,Adversary No. 07-08245A.,Adversary No. 06-08368A.,Adversary No. 06-08341A.,Adversary No. 07-08244A.,Adversary No. 06-08419A.,Adversary No. 06-08389A.,Adversary No. 06-08387A.,Adversary No. 06-08431A.,Adversary No. 06-08338A.,Adversary No. 06-08423A.,Adversary No. 06-08420A.,Adversary No. 06-08337A.,Adversary No. 06-08340A.,Adversary No. 07-08246A.,Adversary No. 06-08415A.,Adversary No. 06-08398A.,Adversary No. 06-08430A.,Adversary No. 06-08373A.,Adversary No. 06-08412A.,Adversary No. 06-08339A.
Citation396 B.R. 810
PartiesIn re BAYOU GROUP, LLC, et al., Debtors. Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC v. Redwood Growth Partners, L.P. Bayou No Leverage Fund, LLC v. Christian Brothers High School Endowment. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. D. Canale Beverages, Inc. Bayou No Leverage Fund, LLC v. Fred Montesi IRA and Fred Montesi. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Helen Yulman Revocable Trust. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Heritage Hedged Equity Fund LP. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. John D. Canale III. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. KFI Capital Partners LLC. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Mary P. Smythe Residuary Trust. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Mary Jane Pidgeon Sledge. Bayou No Leverage Fund, LLC v. Mayer and Morris Kaplan Foundation. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. YK Investment Partnership II. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Marvin E. Bruce Living Trust. Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC v. Freestone Low Volatility Partners LP. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. William Strang. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Randall M. Rothstein and Sheryl B. Rothstein. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Alan Osofsky. Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC v. Madison Capital Advisors Ltd. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Highgate Partners LP. Bayou No Leverage Fund, LLC v. DW Resources Defined Benefit Plan and Marc Daniels. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Michael Mann. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Myrna Bennett. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. H & B Hedge Fund II LLC. Bayou No Leverage Fund, LLC v. Marc Fleisher IRA and Marc Fleisher. Bayou No Leverage Fund, LLC v. Peter Haje IRA and Peter Haje. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Kevin Bass. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Michael Davidson. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Sterling Stamos Security Fund, L.P., Sterling Stamos Security Fund— Friends and Family, L.P., Sterling Stamos Growth Fund, L.P., and Sterling Stamos Liquidity Fund, L.P. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. DB Structured Products Inc. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. High Sierra Investments. Bayou No Leverage Fund, LLC v. John Barr III IRA and John Barr III. Bayou Superfund, LLC v. Neil D. Cohen. Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC v. Edward Sorkin and Virginia Sorkin.
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York

Gary J. Mennitt, Esq., Jonathan D. Perry, Esq., Elise Scherr Frejka, Esq., Dechert LLP, Tracy L. Klestadt, Esq., Brendan Scott, Esq., Klestadt & Winters, LLP, New York, NY, for the Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession.

Carole Neville, Esq., Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, New York, NY, for Twenty-four Defendants.

Jeff F. Friedman, Esq., Katten, Muchin, Rosenman, LLP, New York, NY, for Peter Haje IRA and Peter Haje.

Richard B. Feldman, Esq., Rosenberg Feldman Smith, LLP, New York, NY, for Freestone Low Volatility Partners, LP.

Kevin Burke, Esq., Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, New York, NY, for DB Structured Products Inc.

Marcy Harris, Esq., Schulte, Roth & Zabel, LLP, New York, NY, for Sterling Stamos Security Fund, L.P., Sterling Stamos Security Fund—Friends and Family, L.P., Sterling Stamos Growth Fund, L.P., and Sterling Stamos Liquidity Fund, L.P.

Joseph W. Allen, Esq., Jaeckle Fleischmann & Mugel, LLP, Buffalo, NY, for Christian Brothers High School Endowment.

H. William Munno, Esq., Seward & Kissel, LLP, New York, NY, for Mary Jane Pidgeon Sledge.

P. Gregory Schwed, Esq., Loeb & Loeb, LLP, New York, NY, for Highgate Partners LP.

DECISIONS ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ADLAI S. HARDIN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

Table of Contents
                Page
                Jurisdiction ..................................................................822
                Overview of the Facts .........................................................822
                Prior Motions to Dismiss ......................................................824
                Discussion ....................................................................824
                    I.  Standards for summary judgment ........................................824
                    II.  Section 548(a) issues and conclusions ................................825
                         A. The statute and case law ..........................................825
                         B. The evidence: criminal pleas/allocutions and the Lenhart Report ...828
                            1. What the evidence shows ........................................828
                               (a) Guilty pleas and allocutions ...............................828
                               (b) The Lenhart Report .........................................831
                            2. Admissibility ..................................................834
                               (a) Guilty pleas and allocutions ...............................834
                               (b) The Lenhart Report .........................................835
                         C. No triable issues of fact .........................................842
                         D. Ultimate findings and conclusions .................................842
                            1. Actual fraud under Section 548(a)(1)(A) ........................842
                            2. Constructive fraud under Section 548(a)(1)(B) ..................843
                    III. Section 548(c) issues and conclusions ................................843
                         A. The statute and case law ..........................................843
                         B. Background: good faith defenses accepted by plaintiffs ............853
                            1. Proceedings not settled ........................................853
                                  John Barr III IRA and John Barr III (Adv.Proc. No. 07-08244)
                Myrna Bennett (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08420) Madison
                Capital Advisors Ltd. (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08403) .............853
                            2. Proceedings settled ............................................853
                         C. Good faith defenses sustained .....................................854
                            1. DB Structured Products, Inc. (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08494) ..........854
                
                2. High Sierra Investments (Adv.Proc. No. 07-08243) ...............856
                            3. Michael Mann (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08419) ..........................858
                         D. Issues of fact requiring a trial ..................................860
                            1. William Strang (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08387) Randall M. and
                Sheryl B. Rothstein (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08389) Alan Osofsky
                (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08398) DW Resources DBP and Marc
                Daniels (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08415) Marc Fleisher IRA and
                Marc Fleisher (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08423) Kevin Bass (Adv
                Proc. No. 06-08431) Michael Davidson (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08435)
                Neil D. Cohen (Adv.Proc. No. 07-08245) Edward and
                Virginia Sorkin (Adv.Proc. No. 07-08246) ......................860
                            2. Mary Jane Pidgeon Sledge (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08339) ..............860
                            3. Sterling Stamos Funds (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08493) .................861
                            4. Highgate Partners LP (Adv.Proc. No. 06-8412) ...................863
                         E. Summary judgment granted for plaintiffs ...........................865
                            1. Background: the Altegris due diligence .........................865
                            2. Background: the Westervelt complaint ...........................867
                            3. Investigation by CSG and Centennial ............................869
                            4. Imputation of CSG's knowledge to its clients ...................872
                            5. Facts specific to the CSG or Centennial clients ................874
                               (a) Redwood Growth Partners, L.P. (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08318)
                Heritage Hedged Equity Fund LP (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08333) ...874
                               (b) Christian Brothers High School Endowment (Adv.Proc
                No. 06-08320) .............................................874
                               (c) D. Canale Beverages, Inc. (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08321) John
                D. Canale III (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08336) ....................875
                               (d) Marvin E. Bruce Living Trust (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08368) ......876
                               (e) Mary P. Smythe Residuary Trust (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08338) ....877
                               (f) KFI Capital Partners LLC (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08337) YK
                Investment Partnership II (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08341)
                Helen Yulman Revocable Trust (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08332)
                Mayer and Morris Kaplan Foundation (Adv
                Proc. No. 06-08340) .......................................878
                               (g) Fred Montesi IRA and Fred Montesi (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08329) .879
                            6. H & B Hedge Fund II LLC (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08422) ...............879
                            7. Freestone Low Volatility Partners LP (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08373) ..880
                            8. Peter Haje IRA and Peter Haje (Adv.Proc. No. 06-08430) .........881
                    IV. Fictitious profits calculation on 2003 fund exchanges .................884
                Orders ........................................................................885
                

Before the Court are motions, and in most cases cross-motions, for summary judgment in thirty-three adversary proceedings brought by plaintiffs-debtors Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC, Bayou No Leverage Fund, LLC and Bayou Superfund, LLC (collectively "plaintiffs," or the "Bayou hedge fund[s]," or simply "Bayou") against defendants-investors in the Bayou hedge funds who successfully redeemed their investments within one year prior to the public collapse in August 2005 of the Bayou hedge fund empire. Plaintiffs sue under Section 548(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §...

To continue reading

Request your trial
46 cases
  • Wiggains v. Reed (In re Wiggains)
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Fifth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Texas
    • April 6, 2015
    ...of any one of the three requisite states of mind... is sufficient to establish the intent element."); see also In re Bayou Group, LLC, 396 B.R. 810 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 439 B.R. 284 (S.D. N.Y. 2010) ("The malicious intent sufficient to support a cause of act......
  • In re THE 1031 TAX GROUP LLC.
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Second Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of New York
    • August 27, 2010
    ...for the characterization of a fraudulent scheme as a Ponzi scheme). See also Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC v. Redwood Growth Partners, L.P. (In re Bayou Group, LLC), 396 B.R. 810, 835 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2008) (“Courts have consistently found that criminal proceeding admissions of a fraudulent sche......
  • Meoli v. Huntington Nat'l Bank (In re Teleservices Grp., Inc.)
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Sixth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Western District of Michigan
    • March 30, 2012
    ...a similar moral indifference in evaluating other aspects of the Code's treatment of fraudulent transfers. For example, the court in Bayou Group observed that Section 548(c) bad faith was “somewhat different” from an ordinary person's association of the term with “dishonesty” and “deceit.” 1......
  • William F. Perkins, in His Capacity of Int'l Mgmt. Assocs., LLC v. Lehman Bros., Inc. (In re Int'l Mgmt. Assocs., LLC)
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Eleventh Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • January 10, 2017
    ...Fla. 2002).73 See supra note 60 and accompanying text.74 444 B.R. at 814 (quoting Bayou Accredited Fund, LLC v. Redwood Growth Partners (In re Bayou Group, LLC), 396 B.R. 810, 884 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008), rev'd in part, 439 B.R. 284 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ).75 444 B.R. at 814 (quoting Harrell v. Be......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Chapter IV Proving the Elements
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Institute Advanced Fraudulent Transfers: A Litigation Guide
    • Invalid date
    ...(In re Blatstein), 192 F.3d 88, 97 (3d Cir. 1999); Bayou Accredited Fund LLC v. Redwood Growth Partners L.P. (In re Bayou Group LLC), 396 B.R. 810, 826 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008); Tronox v. Kerr McGee Corp. (In re Tronox), Adv. Pro. No. 09-1198 (ALG), 2013 WL 6596696, at *23-24, 27 (Bankr. S.D.......
  • CHAPTER 2 TINKERBELLE, THE CRUDE PEOPLE AND THE BANKRUPTCY CODE
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Financial Distress in the Oil & Gas Industry (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...84 F.3d 1330, 1338 (10th Cir. 1996); In re Anchorage Marina, Inc. 93 B.R. 686, 693 (Bankr. D.N.D. 1988). See also In re Bayou Group LLC, 396 B.R. 810 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008) (adopting "objective" or "reasonable person" standard with respect to investor redemptions). [225] Brown v. Third Nat'......
  • Chapter 13 priority, Claims and Distribution
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Institute Bankruptcy in Practice
    • Invalid date
    ...disallowed based on the claim seller's misconduct. In re Enron Corp., 333 B.R. 205 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2005); see also In re Bayou Grp., LLC, 396 B.R. 810 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008); In re Enron Corp., 340 B.R. 180 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. March 31, 2006) (claim purchaser may have its claim disallowed und......
  • Chapter V Affirmative Defenses
    • United States
    • American Bankruptcy Institute Advanced Fraudulent Transfers: A Litigation Guide
    • Invalid date
    ...that limitations period in § 546(a) can be waived or extended by agreement).[552] Id.[553] 11 U.S.C. § 548(c). See also In re Bayou Group, 396 B.R. 810, 822, 844 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2008) ("[A] transferee ... may retain the transfer ... if both of two conditions are met: (i) if the transferee ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT