In re Beechwood

Decision Date20 December 1940
PartiesIn re BEECHWOOD.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of New Jersey

Osborne, Cornish & Scheck, of Newark, N. J., for petitioning creditor.

Bertram K. Wolfe, of Philadelphia, Pa., and James Mercer Davis, of Camden, N. J., for alleged bankrupt.

FORMAN, District Judge.

On November 22, 1940, an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against the above-named alleged bankrupt, and the American Surety Company of New York is the sole petitioning creditor. On November 29, 1940, a rule was issued directing the American Surety Company of New York to show cause why the involuntary petition in bankruptcy should not be dismissed. This rule was based upon a petition of the bankrupt, and the controversy is presently confined to the objections that the petition for involuntary bankruptcy is defective in that it does not allege a claim "fixed as to liability" and "liquidated as to amount" as is required by Section 59, sub. b of the Bankruptcy Act of 1938, 11 U.S.C. A. § 95, sub. b.

The relevant parts of the petition for involuntary bankruptcy allege: John Jacob Beechwood was employed in one of the claim departments of Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York. The petitioner executed on December 31, 1929, a bond covering the employer of Beechwood "against loss arising from unlawful acts of its employees". The petitioner is a "creditor of said John Jacob Beechwood, the alleged bankrupt, having a provable claim against him, fixed as to liability and liquidated as to amount, in excess of the sum of $500.00" for the following particularly described reasons: "Between March 6th, 1940, and September 9th, 1940, the said John Jacob Beechwood caused drafts for the withdrawal of money to be drawn upon the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York and signed by persons who were employed by the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York in the department in which the said John Jacob Beechwood was the manager or supervisor. The said drafts totalled $108,535.00. The said drafts were unlawfully drawn and the proceeds thereof were unlawfully converted by the said John Jacob Beechwood to his own use. The alleged bankrupt herein became indebted to the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York in the sum of $108,535.00 by reason of his having unlawfully converted to his own use the proceeds of the said drafts. The said Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York has made a claim against your petitioner in the sum of $108,535.00 by reason of the loss sustained by it through the said actions of the said alleged bankrupt, its claim being based on the bond which was issued by your petitioner to the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York as hereinabove stated. For valuable consideration the said Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York has assigned the aforesaid claim of $108,535.00 unto your petitioner".

Counsel agree and it is the law that a ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • In re Silver
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Illinois
    • May 1, 1953
    ...Heggie v. Inter-State Produce Co., 205 Ill.App. 270. The court, in determining whether a claim of a debtor was liquidated in In re Beechwood, D.C., 36 F.Supp. 140, said at page "A tortious quality, indeed, enters into the nature of the claim, because it arises out of the alleged conversion ......
  • In re Walton Plywood, 50795.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • January 27, 1964
    ...conversion of the proceeds thereof in a fixed amount was sufficiently fixed as to liability and liquidated as to amount. In re Beechwood, 36 F.Supp. 140 (D.N.J.1940). On the other hand, it has been held that other claims, e. g., an unadjudicated claim of a discharged accountant for the valu......
  • IN RE EASTERN SUPPLY COMPANY
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • January 8, 1959
    ...* * *" creditors have in substance alleged claims liquidated as to amount and not contingent as to liability. In re Beechwood, D.C.N.J.1940, 36 F.Supp. 140, 142. An appropriate order granting intervention and denying the Motion to Dismiss will be entered. 1 Mr. Levy has long since been auth......
  • In re Pauline's Fashion Salon
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • May 17, 1954
    ...the difference between the value thereof and the amount due exceeded $500.00. It is our thought that the opinion in In re Beechwood, D.C.N.J.1940, 36 F. Supp. 140 contains an extremely clear discussion on the sufficiency of the allegations as to claims of petitioning creditors in involuntar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT