In re Bowen
Decision Date | 13 November 1942 |
Docket Number | No. 21101.,21101. |
Citation | 46 F. Supp. 631 |
Parties | In re BOWEN. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
David Getz, of Allentown, Pa., Herbert S. Leman, of New York City, and Herman H. Krekstein, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner Henry Baker.
Fred B. Gernerd, of Allentown, Pa., for trustee.
Charles M. Bolich, of Allentown, Pa., for bankrupt.
The bankrupt's estate consisted of real estate and a block of stock. The bankrupt owned five parcels of real estate, situated in Allentown, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania, all of which were encumbered by various mortgages, judgments, and tax liens of the Federal government. The stock was held by a creditor as collateral security for a loan.
Henry Baker, one of the petitioners who has filed the present certificate of review, owned five of the judgments. Prior to the bankruptcy proceedings he had issued execution on one of the judgments in the sum of $79,242.42 on one of the parcels of real estate (the Hamilton Street property) which was advertised for sale by the Sheriff of Lehigh County. On July 21, 1939, the bankrupt made an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and the assignees secured an order in the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County enjoining the sale. The assignees proceeded to advertise the sale of the real estate, and on November 8, 1939, the bankrupt filed his voluntary petition in bankruptcy and obtained an order from the referee to stay the sale.
As matters thus stood, the referee called the first meeting of creditors on December 8, 1939, and, at the outset, made the following statement (p. 04, N. T.):
In accordance with the suggestion of the referee, David Getz, Esq., of counsel for Henry Baker, on the adjourned meeting of December 11, 1939, placed the following stipulation of record (pp. 07, 08, N. T.):
Counsel for the lien creditors joined in this stipulation in the record of the said meeting. The trustee and his counsel thereafter negotiated with various purchasers and petitioned the referee for leave to sell all the real estate of the bankrupt free of all encumbrances and liens. The trustee's petition sought to sell each of the parcels separately except two properties (the Ninth Street and the Hamilton Street properties) which he prayed to sell together as a unit. Counsel for Henry Baker objected to the sale of these properties as a unit, and the referee overruled his objection. The following remarks appear on the record of the minutes of the meeting of February 8, 1940 (pp. XXX-XXX-XXX, N. T.):
* * * * *
The ruling of the referee on the joint sale was upon Baker's review, reversed by this court (35 F.Supp. 60).
Subsequently, in August, 1940, all the parcels of real estate were sold by the trustee free and clear of liens and encumbrances with the exception of the Linden and North Third Street properties, which were abandoned.
The amounts realized from the sale were as follows:
Hamilton Street property......$457,500.00 Ninth Street property......... 35,000.00 Factory building.............. 3,000.00 Vacant land................... 25.00
The proceeds from the sale of the real estate were not sufficient to pay off the liens and encumbrances, and produced nothing available for general creditors.
The audit of the trustee's first and partial account was had at a meeting before the referee on the 16th of December, 1940, wherein the referee announced that the account showed receipts of $497,525.60 and a balance of $149,134.60. At this meeting the various requests for allowances were considered as follows:
Robert E. Haas Trustee's commissions.........$ 4,095.25 Fred B. Gernerd Attorney for trustee.......... 15,000.00 Charles M. Bolich Attorney for bankrupt......... 2,500.00
The referee made a statement that he was entitled to a commission of $3,395.60 under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act; approved the items spent or contracted for in the bankruptcy proceedings, and left open the items relating to the assignment for the benefit of the creditors which had been made prior to the bankruptcy.
Counsel for Henry Baker objected to all requests for allowances, including the referee's commissions, on the ground that they were in excess of the stipulation made at the hearing on December 11, 1939, which, he asserted, provided that only a sum not to exceed $4,000. could be charged against the lien holders for administration expenses. The referee overruled his objections. The referee orally allowed the request of the trustee in full, with the understanding that he might presently be paid $4,000 on account. The referee did not then pass on the request of the attorney for the trustee, but presently allowed him $5,000 on account. He also left open the request of the attorney for the bankrupt. The referee, however, stated that no payments whatsoever would be made in the face of counsel's objection, and that the trustee would hold up such payments until he was further directed by the referee. No formal order of allowance was made in any instance.
Much that transpired thereafter at private conferences with regard to allowances is in the realm of confusion and dispute. The various parties tried to get together and reach an agreement but apparently failed to do so. On March 11, 1941, the trustee made payments,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coppola v. Superior Court
...(See, e.g., In re American Magnestone Co. (S.D.Ill.1929) 34 F.2d 681, 682; In re Beardsley, supra, 38 F.Supp. 799, 803; In re Bowen (EDPa.1942) 46 F.Supp. 631, 637.) The rights of creditors, including lienholders, are transferred from the res to the sale proceeds. (Gotkin v. Korn (D.C.1950)......
-
In re Music Merchandisers, Inc., Bankruptcy No. 385-01035.
...paying loan); In re Prindible, 115 F.2d 21 (3d Cir.1940) (commission "only on the value of the equity of redemption"); In re Bowen, 46 F.Supp. 631 (E.D.Pa.1942) (following Prindible). But see In re Stanley, 120 B.R. 409 (Bankr. E.D.Tex.1990) (commission allowed on dollar value of lien When ......
-
In re Nuclear Imaging Systems, Inc.
...administrative expenses could be paid from its collateral was enforceable only to the limit so agreed upon. Therefore, in In re Bowen, 46 F.Supp. 631, 637 (E.D.Pa.1942), the District Court reversed a decision of the Bankruptcy Referee which had surcharged the proceeds of collateral more tha......
-
In re Hotel Associates, Inc., Bankruptcy No. 79-02203K.
...as a holder of a secured claim, and, in so moving the court, the Fund has "invoked the aid of the Bankruptcy Court." In re Bowen, 46 F.Supp. 631 (E.D.Pa.1942). Cases under the former Bankruptcy Act stressed the importance of the secured creditor's consent to a charge upon the secured assets......