In re Bracken, Bankruptcy No. 80-00808G

Decision Date01 December 1983
Docket Number82-1781G.,Bankruptcy No. 80-00808G,Adv. No. 82-1661G
Citation35 BR 84
PartiesIn re James J. BRACKEN, Dorothy Bracken, Debtors. MT. VERNON CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. James BRACKEN and Dorothy Bracken, and Leonard Goldberger, Trustee, Defendants. James J. BRACKEN and Dorothy Bracken, Plaintiffs, v. MT. VERNON CONSUMER DISCOUNT COMPANY, Defendant.
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Alan B. Liss, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff, Mt. Vernon Consumer Discount Co.

David L. Hill, Philadelphia, Pa., for debtors, James J. Bracken and Dorothy Bracken.

Leonard P. Goldberger, Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, Philadelphia, Pa., Trustee.

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

Two issues are embraced by this opinion. Firstly, is the debtor's complaint for avoidance of a mortgage under § 506(a) and (d) of the Bankruptcy Code ("the Code") and secondly is a creditor's complaint for relief from the automatic stay pursuant to § 362(d). For the reasons stated herein we will avoid the mortgage and deny relief from the stay.

The facts of the case are as follows:1 The debtors filed a petition for relief under chapter 7 of the Code on April 16, 1980. They own a parcel of realty which we find to be worth $1,000.002 which is encumbered by a first mortgage held by East Girard Savings and Loan Association ("East Girard") in the amount of $1,424.71 and a second mortgage of Mount Vernon Consumer Discount Company ("Mount Vernon") for $7,013.69. The debtors are currently in default on both mortgages. When Mount Vernon commenced the action at bench for relief from the automatic stay, the debtors responded by instituting an action for avoidance of Mount Vernon's mortgage under § 506(a) and (d) to the extent that the indebtedness under the mortgage exceeded value of the property.

A creditor's claim in bankruptcy is secured only "to the extent of the value of such creditor's interest in the estate's interest in such property. . . ." § 506(a). The remainder of the claim is unsecured. Id. Under § 506(d) a debtor may bring an action to avoid a mortgage to the extent that the mortgage exceeds the fair market value of the property. Spadel v. Household Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Spadel), 28 B.R. 537 (B.R.E.D.Pa.1983). Since we have determined that the property at issue is worth only $1,000.00, the first mortgagee, who holds a mortgage of $1,424.71 is only partially secured. Consequently, Mount Vernon, as the second mortgagee, is completely unsecured. Thus, we will avoid Mount Vernon's mortgage in full. Since Mount Vernon's request for relief from the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT