In re C.A.C.
Decision Date | 02 November 2017 |
Docket Number | NO. 2017–CA–0108,2017–CA–0108 |
Parties | IN RE: C.A.C. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Leslie A. Bonin, 700 Camp Street, New Orleans, LA 70130, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT
Jane Ettinger Booth, BOOTH & BOOTH, APLC, 138 North Cortez Street, New Orleans, LA 70119, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE
(Court composed of Judge Terri F. Love, Judge Roland L. Belsome, Judge Joy Cossich Lobrano, Judge Marion F. Edwards, Pro Tempore, Judge Terrel J. Broussard, Pro Tempore)
This is an appeal from a trial court judgment granting joint custody of a minor child to the biological mother and her former life partner. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
The child was born as a result of artificial insemination during the course of a long term same-sex relationship between Dr. Lisa Colon and Victoria Adjmi. After the parties separated in 2014, Ms. Adjmi filed this Petition for Custody seeking joint custody pursuant to La. C.C. art. 133. Dr. Colon filed exceptions of no cause of action, no right of action and vagueness to the custody petition. The trial court denied the exceptions and appointed Tina Chaisson as the custody evaluator. After this Court and the Louisiana Supreme Court denied Dr. Colon's writ applications for review of the ruling denying the exceptions, the parties participated in the custody evaluation with Ms. Chaisson.
Ms. Chaisson submitted a report to the court on January 4, 2016 in which she applied the "best interest of the child" legal standard. Ms. Adjmi filed a motion requesting the court to instruct Ms. Chaisson to apply the "substantial harm to the child" legal standard as defined by La. C.C. art. 133 relating to a custody claim by a non-parent. The court granted that motion and Ms. Chaisson filed a supplemental report in compliance with that order. Both reports recommended an award of joint custody.
The matter went to a trial on the merits, after which, the trial court rendered judgment in Ms. Adjmi's favor. The judgment, which awards joint custody and sets forth detailed visitation rights, is supported by comprehensive reasons for judgment.
The facts regarding the relationship of the parties and the conditions of the child's birth are undisputed. Dr. Lisa Colon and Victoria Adjmi began a romantic relationship in 1996, and lived together as a committed couple for over 18 years.1 During that time they built a home together, shared finances and bank accounts. Both women are financially successful. Dr. Colon is a gynecologist/obstetrician and Ms. Adjmi is a business woman who owns several retail stores.
In 2007 the couple decided to start a family. It was decided that Dr. Colon, who is 10 years younger than Ms. Adjmi, would undergo an artificial insemination procedure. Both women were involved in the selection of the donor, the pregnancy and the birth. Both women agreed that the donor should be Jewish, Ms. Adjmi's faith. The procedure was successful and Dr. Colon gave birth to a baby girl on October 27, 2007. Ms. Adjmi was present at the birth and cut the umbilical cord. The child was named Charlie Adjmi Colon (Charlie) in a tribute to Ms. Adjmi's father.
Two days after Charlie's birth, Dr. Colon hand wrote and signed a notarized document that states. "In the unlikely event of my demise (death) Vicki Susan Adjmi is to attain total/complete/sole custody of Charlie Adjmi Colon."
On April 4, 2008, the parties entered into a "Domestic Partnership Agreement". The effective date of the agreement was October 27, 2007, the date of Charlie's birth. There are three pertinent sections of this agreement.
Additionally, Dr. Colon executed a Power of Attorney in which she granted Ms. Adjmi;
On April 21, 2009, Dr. Colon executed her Last Will and Testament in which she bequeaths her property to her "life partner, Victoria Susan Adjmi" and her daughter Charlie Adjmi Colon. The will provides for a trust to be set up for Charlie with Ms. Adjmi as the sole Trustee. Most significant are the following provisions:
Dr. Colon, Ms. Adjmi and Charlie lived as a family for the first seven years of Charlie's life. Then, in 2014 Dr. Colon became romantically involved with Ms. Adjmi's sister-in-law (the wife of Ms. Adjmi's brother), Amanda Adjmi, and the couple separated as a result. Dr. Colon now resides with Amanda Adjmi, Charlie and, during their visitation with their mother, Amanda Adjmi's two children.
It is obvious from the filing of this action for custody and the actions and testimony of the parties that the breakup resulted in an acrimonious relationship between Dr. Colon and Ms. Adjmi. Since the breakup Dr. Colon has taken steps to limit Ms. Adjmi's participation in Charlie's life. Dr. Colon testified that she has limited Ms. Adjmi's ability to communicate with Charlie's school specifically to prevent Ms. Adjmi from attending parent-teacher conferences. Dr. Colon also admitted that she will not allow Ms. Adjmi to take Charlie on trips because on one trip to New York Charlie developed a fever and Ms. Adjmi did not take the child to a doctor. Ms. Adjmi explained that she called Dr. Colon from New York when Charlie became ill to ask advice because Dr. Colon is a medical doctor. Dr. Colon flew up to New York that night and took Charlie to a doctor the next day.
Dr. Colon also expressed concerns about Ms. Adjmi's living conditions. Specifically, Dr. Colon stated that Ms. Adjmi's sister smokes marijuana in front of Charlie. However, both Ms. Adjmi and her sister denied that accusation.
Ms. Adjmi testified that Dr. Colon has completely barred her from any communications with Charlie's school, does not inform her of school activities, extracurricular activities, or doctor's appointments, and does not allow her to take Charlie on vacation. Ms. Adjmi also testified that Dr. Colon is in complete control of Charlie's schedule and does not allow sufficient time or communications with Ms. Adjmi. Dr. Colon admitted she controls Charlie's schedule but asserts that she is aware of the strong bond between Charlie and Ms. Adjmi and allows visits and communications between the two as she deems appropriate.
Although Dr. Colon testified that it was she who parented Charlie and made all of the decisions, she acknowledged that there is a love bond between Charlie and Ms. Adjmi and that Charlie thinks of Ms. Adjmi as a mother. She also testified that Charlie loves to be with Ms. Adjmi and is comfortable in her home, which is a few blocks away from Dr. Colon's home. Other testimony from relatives and experts shows that Charlie thinks of both Dr. Colon and Ms. Adjmi as her mothers and that Charlie considers Ms. Adjmi's mother to be her grandmother.
Tina Chaisson, the court appointed expert testified that both parties cooperated with the custody evaluation and provided additional information. During her evaluation Ms. Chaisson met with Charlie alone and observed her with each of the parties in their homes. Ms. Chaisson also reviewed school, medical and...
To continue reading
Request your trial- S.L.B. v. C.E.B.
- Cook v. Sullivan
- Smith v. Harmon
- Cook v. Sullivan