In re Caplan, 96-BG-541.

Decision Date27 March 1997
Docket NumberNo. 96-BG-541.,96-BG-541.
Citation691 A.2d 1152
PartiesIn re Walter H. CAPLAN, Respondent.
CourtD.C. Court of Appeals

Before FERREN, FARRELL, and RUIZ, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Following his conviction and sentence in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco, for grand theft (§ 487 of the California Penal Code) and practice of law without a license (§ 6126(b) of the California Business and Professions Code), respondent was disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of the State of California. The Board on Professional Responsibility likewise recommends disbarment, see D.C.Code § 11-2503(a) (1995), on the ground that the theft statute under which respondent was convicted involves moral turpitude per se. See In re Colson, 412 A.2d 1160, 1168 (D.C.1979) (en banc). We agree with that conclusion and accept the Board's recommendation.* Criminal offenses involving theft and fraud inherently involve moral turpitude. In re Sluys, 632 A.2d 734 (D.C.1993); In re Slater, 627 A.2d 508 (D.C.1993); In re Schwartz, 619 A.2d 39 (D.C.1993); In re Boyd, 593 A.2d 183 (D.C.1991). The crime of grand theft under California law, requiring as it does a felonious intent to steal or take property in addition to the actual stealing or taking, e.g., People v. Arriola, 330 P.2d 683, 164 Cal. App.2d 430 (1958), inherently involves moral turpitude.

Bar Counsel informs us, without dispute, that respondent has not filed the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI § 14(g) (1996). See Slater, 627 A.2d at 509. Accordingly, we order that respondent Walter H. Caplan be disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately.

So ordered.

* We dismiss the concurrent reciprocal discipline matter.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • In re Slattery
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • January 25, 2001
  • In re Krouner, 04-BG-431.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • April 12, 2007
    ...We have consistently held that felonies involving intentional theft or fraud involve moral turpitude. See, e.g., In re Caplan, 691 A.2d 1152, 1152 (D.C.1997) ("Criminal offenses involving theft and fraud inherently involve moral turpitude."); see also In re Firestone, 824 A.2d 47 (D.C.2003)......
  • In re Daniel, 09-BG-916.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • January 13, 2011
    ...(en banc). Instead, the court ordered Moore suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for three years. Moore, 691 A.2d at 1152. Similarly, Daniel commingled funds, a serious violation of Rule 1.15(a), but did not misappropriate, the more egregious Rule 1.15(a) violation......
  • In re Bendet, 97-BG-656.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • November 12, 1998
    ...12. In addition, criminal offenses involving theft or intent to defraud result in disbarment in the District of Columbia. See In re Caplan, 691 A.2d 1152 (D.C.1997); In re Sneed, 673 A.2d 591 (D.C.1996); In re Untalan, 619 A.2d 978 (D.C.1993). Disbarment is therefore appropriate as reciproc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT