In re Care & Treatment of Ontiberos
| Docket Number | 100362 |
| Decision Date | 17 August 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
42 cases
-
In re Ellison
... ... delay in going forward with a full hearing and holding statutory procedures to conclude temporary suspension under scheme that provided no time within which to hold hearing and permitted period twice suspension length to issue final order violated due process); In re Care & Treatment of Ontiberos , 295 Kan. 10, 25, 287 P.3d 855 (2012) (applying Eldridge and holding KSVPA respondent has due process right to appointed counsel at trial); State v. Easterling , 289 Kan. 470, 482, 213 P.3d 418 (2009) (applying Eldridge factors and holding procedures for presentation of information ... ...
-
Miller v. Johnson
... ... This has been true, even when the issue before us has been one of state constitutional law. See In re Ontiberos, 295 Kan. 10, , 287 P.3d 855 (2012) (referring to Virginia Supreme Court's interpretation of Virginia Constitution); State v. SanchezLoredo, 294 Kan. 50, 58, 272 P.3d 34 (2012) (citing multiple cases from other jurisdictions interpreting their state constitutions under similar challenges); In ... ...
-
State v. Betancourt
... ... Here, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Betancourt's pro se motion. Under those circumstances, this court reviews any factual findings for substantial competent evidence and evaluates whether those findings support the trial court's conclusions of law. In re Ontiberos, 295 Kan. 10, 32, 287 P.3d 855 (2012) ; see 342 P.3d 933 Thompson v. State, 293 Kan. 704, 71516, 270 P.3d 1089 (2011) (reviewing K.S.A. 601507 evidentiary hearing). The trial court's legal conclusions are reviewed de novo. See State v. Gonzales, 289 Kan. 351, 35859, 212 P.3d 215 (2009). 301 ... ...
-
In re Chapman
... ... 5 Cf. Vitek , 445 U.S. at 49697, 100 S.Ct. 1254 ; In re Care & Treatment of Ontiberos , 295 Kan. 10, 287 P.3d 855, 86465 (2012) (examining the three due process factors espoused in 419 S.C. 180 Mathews v. Eldridge , 424 U.S. 319, 335, 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), and concluding there is a constitutional right to counsel arising under the Fourteenth Amendment and the state ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
JURY BIAS RESULTING IN INDEFINITE COMMITMENT: EXPANDING PROCEDURAL PROTECTIONS IN SVP CIVIL COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE MATHEWS TEST.
...(90.) 445 U.S. 480 (1980). (91.) Id. at 484. (92.) Id. at 482, 497. (93.) Id. at 497 (Powell, J., concurring). (94.) In re Ontiberos, 287 P.3d 855, 864 (Kan. 2012); Jenkins v. Dir. of the Va. Ctr. for Behav. Rehab., 624 S.E.2d 453, 459 (Va. (95.) See, e.g., Grado v. State (In re Grado), 559......