In re Carter-Williams Grain & Coal Co., 244.
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit) |
Citation | 297 F. 441 |
Docket Number | 244. |
Parties | In re CARTER-WILLIAMS GRAIN & COAL CO. CARTER v. STOCK. |
Decision Date | 27 March 1924 |
297 F. 441
In re CARTER-WILLIAMS GRAIN & COAL CO. CARTER
v.
STOCK.
No. 244.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 27, 1924
Bart M. Lockwood, of St. Joseph, Mo., for petitioner.
Frank P. Barker, of Kansas City, Mo. (Arthur Miller and Miller, Camack, Winger & Reeder, all of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondent.
Before LEWIS, Circuit Judge, and SYMES and PHILLIPS, District Judges. [297 F. 442]
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
This is an original petition under Section 24b of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. Sec. 9608), which gives to this court jurisdiction 'to superintend and revise in matter of law the proceedings of the several inferior courts of bankruptcy. ' The petition discloses that George W. Carter, a resident of St. Joseph, Missouri, had been ordered to pay over to the trustee of the bankrupt estate of Carter-Williams Grain & Coal Company, then pending on settlement in the St. Joseph Division of the Western District of Missouri, certain sums of money belonging to that estate, and that he had failed to comply with that order within the time limited, that Carter was then served with an order to show cause, returnable December 26, 1922, if any he had, why he should not be punished for contempt on account of his failure to pay over the money as directed, that thereafter and on December 26, 1922, an order was entered adjudging him in contempt for his failure, and he was thereupon committed to jail. The order finding him in contempt is alleged to have been made erroneously as a matter of law and the commitment is said to be invalid, that the former was entered and the latter issued without jurisdiction in the court to do either-- because the order to show cause issued out of the Western Division instead of out of the St. Joseph Division of the Western District, and commanded the petitioner to appear before the Judge of the Bankruptcy Court in the Western Division instead of in the St. Joseph Division, and the order of contempt was entered in the Western Division and the commitment issued from that division.
The response of the trustee in bankruptcy alleges that all applications, orders and pleadings complained of were in truth and in fact entered and filed in the cause of Carter-Williams Grain & Coal Company, bankrupt, pending in the St. Joseph Division for the Western District, that Carter was accorded a hearing on the return of the order to show cause and thereupon adjudged to be in contempt for not having complied with the previous order to pay over the money to the trustee. Certified copies of the order to show cause, of the order adjudging Carter in contempt and of the writ of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Baptist Home Mission Soc. v. Bowman, 4038.
...the reversal is based wholly upon the holding by that court that the legacy had lapsed. See, also, Close v. Farmers Co., 195 N.Y. [297 F. 441.] 92, 100, 87 N.E. 1005, and cases there cited; Page on Wills, 468. The attempt of the Larkins sisters to convey by deeds estates in fee simple in th......
-
United States v. Missco Homestead Ass'n, 14100.
...Homestead Association, Inc., appeared and filed an answer it waived any question of venue. In re Carter-Williams Grain & Coal Co., 8 Cir., 297 F. 441. Section 1(13) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 1(13), provides that the commencement of the proceedings in bankruptcy with reference to ......