In re Centennial Board of Finance

Decision Date29 June 1891
Citation48 F. 350
PartiesIn re CENTENNIAL BOARD OF FINANCE.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania

S. S. Hollingsworth and Thos. Dudley, for petitioners.

BUTLER, J.

The petitioners are not ordinary trustees, but the officers of a corporation, with active duties to perform as such. The distribution of the moneys in their hands is provided for by the statute out of which the corporation grew. The petitioners are required to divide it among the stockholders. From the performance of this duty we cannot relieve them. Their situation is rendered embarrassing by the circumstances stated in the petition, and we would relieve them if we had the power to do so, and could thus exercise it with propriety. Relief may probably be found through application to congress.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Turner v. Browne
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 20, 1943
    ... ... 439; Crystal Pier ... Co. v. Schneider, 180 P. 948; In re Centennial Board ... of Finance, 48 F. 350. (2) As statutory liquidators the ... trustees of this dissolved ... ...
  • Glover v. Board of Flour Inspectors
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • December 13, 1891

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT