In re Claar Cellars LLC
Decision Date | 14 January 2021 |
Docket Number | Lead Case No. 20-00044-WLH11 (Jointly Administered) |
Citation | 623 B.R. 578 |
Parties | IN RE: CLAAR CELLARS LLC, and RC Farms LLC, Debtors. |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Washington |
Roger William Bailey, Joshua J. Busey, Bailey & Busey LLC, Yakima, WA, Toni Meacham, Toni Meacham, Attorney at Law, Connell, WA, Steven H. Sackmann, Sackmann Law Office, Othello, WA, for
The wine business is difficult even during the best of times. The year 2020 was not the best of times.
Two affiliated debtors engaged in the wine business seek confirmation of a chapter 11 plan that is opposed by their primary secured creditor, HomeStreet Bank. HomeStreet in turn proposed a competing chapter 11 plan that the debtors oppose. After fully considering the evidence presented at a lengthy evidentiary hearing and substantial briefing by the parties, the court has determined that the debtors' plan does not meet the requirements for confirmation but that HomeStreet's plan does. As a result, the court will confirm HomeStreet's plan.
Since the 1980s, Robert and Crista Whitelatch have participated in the wine industry by growing vinifera grapes in the White Bluffs region of Washington State.1 In the 1990s, the Whitelatch family expanded operations by producing and selling finished wine under the Claar Cellars label. Claar Cellars now makes numerous varietal and blended cuvees. Over the years, Claar Cellars has received an array of awards and other recognitions for the quality of its wines and the sustainability of its growing and production practices.
The components of the Whitelatch family's enterprise are presently divided among three legal entities:
Starting in 2016, the debtors began to finance operations with money borrowed from HomeStreet. Claar borrowed under a secured line of credit and an equipment loan, both of which are guaranteed by RC, the Whitelatch Living Trust, and Mr. and Mrs. Whitelatch and their two sons individually. RC borrowed under a term loan; this indebtedness is secured by mortgages on some (but not all) of RC's and the Whitelatch Living Trust's real property and is guaranteed by Claar and the nondebtor individuals guaranteeing the Claar obligations.
The debtors' operations suffered during the period spanning 2016-2019. Claar's revenues dropped steadily each year, sometimes by more than 30% on a year-over-year basis, and the debtors' tax returns reflect mounting operating losses. The business declines eventually triggered a breach of financial covenants in the HomeStreet credit documents. The business relationship deteriorated further as Claar failed to repay the line of credit upon maturity on September 1, 2019, and the debtors ceased making their respective contractual payments on the equipment and term loans.
In response, HomeStreet accelerated all the indebtedness against all obligors. After this action failed to prompt repayment, HomeStreet sued the obligors in Franklin County Superior Court. Among other relief, HomeStreet sought appointment of a custodial receiver regarding certain property the defendants own. In December 2019, the state court appointed Critical Point Advisors, LLC as custodial receiver regarding the debtors' property and some property held in the Whitelatch Living Trust. In January 2020, the debtors countered by filing the instant chapter 11 petitions. The petitions – filed before effectiveness of the state court's receivership order according to the debtors – invoked the automatic stay and allowed the debtors access to the restructuring powers contained in the Bankruptcy Code. The state-court action remains pending, however, and any applicable provisions of the receivership order became operative against the nondebtor defendants in that action.2
These have been active chapter 11 cases featuring many jousts between the debtors and HomeStreet (some of which also involved the unsecured creditors' committee, the receiver, other creditors, and the United States trustee). For purposes of this opinion, significant events include:
The debtors and HomeStreet ultimately filed and pursued confirmation of their respective plans. This confirmation battle has been contentious and zealously litigated. The parties have disagreed about the contents of their respective disclosure statements, the timing and process for a confirmation hearing, the merits of the respective plans, assorted discovery and evidentiary issues, and other ancillary matters.
The confirmation hearing spanned eight days during which the court admitted numerous exhibits and heard the following testimony:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Easterday Ranches, Inc.
...on four planes, with eight sets of sixteen pieces – while time-traveling, blindfolded").39 See, e.g. , In re Claar Cellars LLC , 623 B.R. 578, 601 n.49 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 2021).40 See, e.g. , 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(d)(3)(A), 1121(b) -(c) ; In re LATAM Airlines Grp. S.A. , 620 B.R. 722, 814-15 (Ba......
-
In re Easterday Ranches, Inc.
... ... on four planes, with eight sets of sixteen pieces - while ... time-traveling, blindfolded") ... [ 39 ] See, e.g., In re Claar Cellars ... LLC, 623 B.R. 578, 601 n.49 (Bankr. E.D. Wash ... 2021) ... [ 40 ] See, e.g., 11 U.S.C. §§ ... ...
-
In re Astria Health
...all circumstances").28 Blixseth , 961 F.3d at 1082.29 Id. at 1083.30 See id. at 1083-84.31 See id. at 1084-85.32 Cf. In re Claar Cellars LLC , 623 B.R. 578, 592-93, 2021 Bankr. LEXIS 85, at *24-25 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Jan. 14, 2021) (concluding that chapter 11 plan was unconfirmable because, ......
-
In re Fleming
... ... 648 (9th Cir. BAP 1994), affd, 85 F.3d ... 1415 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1054 (1997); ... In re Claar Cellars LLC , 623 B.R. 578, 590 (Bankr ... E.D. Wash. 2021). On appeal, “[w]hether a plan is fair ... and equitable is a factual ... ...
-
The Objective and Jurisdictional Origins of Chapter 11's Good Faith Filing Requirement.
...debtor under the plan, unless such liquidation or reorganization is proposed in the plan.") (emphasis added); see In re Claar Cellars LLC, 623 B.R. 578, 601 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 2021) ("Although reorganizations are often preferable for a variety of reasons, liquidating chapter 11 plans are ex......