In re Consumers' Coffee Co.
Decision Date | 08 March 1907 |
Docket Number | 2,252. |
Citation | 151 F. 933 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Parties | In re CONSUMERS' COFFEE CO. |
J Frank Staley, for petitioner.
Henry N. Wessel, for creditors.
This is a claim by a landlord to be paid in full for rent accrued at the date of filing the petition, before any other payments are made out of the fund. The facts appear in the following report of the referee, David W. Amram, Esq.:
Coffee Company, bankrupt. On May 15, 1905, three months rent, amounting to $750, was due to him. On May 18, 1905 a petition in bankruptcy was filed against the Consumers' Coffee Company, the tenant. A receiver was appointed, who, acting under order of the District Court, continued the business of the bankrupt for about one year. On April 9, 1906, an adjudication in bankruptcy was entered, and the matter referred to me as referee. On May 1, 1906, at an adjourned first meeting of creditors, at which the landlord was represented, the receiver filed a petition, praying for leave to sell the assets of the bankrupt estate, upon the said premises, 236 Chestnut street, at private sale, for the sum of $700. After due notice to creditors the said petition was considered at an adjourned first meeting of creditors, held May 15, 1906, at which the landlord was represented, and, no one objecting, approved and an order made by me, authorizing the trustee to sell in accordance with the prayer of the petition. On the same date, to wit, May 15, 1906, the landlord filed several proofs of debt, among them a proof for his said claim of $750, for rent due May 15, 1905.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shalet v. Klauder
...Serg. & R. 295; Work's Appeal, 92 Pa. 258; Brown v. Jaquette, 94 Pa. 113, 116, 39 Am. Rep. 770; Barnes Appeal, 76 Pa. 50; In re Consumers' Coffee Co. (D. C.) 151 F. 933; In re Fleishman, 9 A. B. R. (N. S.) The legal question before us is whether or not the intervention of bankruptcy changed......
-
In re Spies-Alper Co.
... ... Re Hayward, 130 F. 720 (D.C.E.D. Penn.), where the ... Pennsylvania statute is set forth in full; and in Re ... Consumers' Coffee Co., 151 F. 933 (D.C.E.D. Penn.) ... See, also, In Re Pittsburgh Drug Co., 164 F. 482 ... (D.C.W.D. Penn.) ... Nor ... would ... ...
-
In re West Side Paper Co.
... ... claim for rent, which takes rank under clause 5. The exact ... point arose recently in this district in Re ... Consumers' Coffee Co. (D.C.) 151 F. 933, and was ... decided against the position now taken by the claimant ... The ... decision of the referee is ... ...
- In re Consumers' Coffee Co.