In re Dassler

Citation35 Kan. 678,12 P. 130
PartiesIn the Matter of the Petition of C. F. W. DASSLER for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Decision Date05 November 1886
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Kansas

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Original Proceedings in Habeas Corpus.

ON January 12, 1885, there was filed in this court, on behalf of C. F. W. Dassler, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition sets forth the following facts:

"1. Your petitioner is restrained of his liberty by one W. D Shallcross, of Leavenworth, Kansas, who is the city marshal of the city of Leavenworth, Kansas, a city of the first class; said petitioner is restrained of his liberty by said city marshal, in the city and county of Leavenworth, in the state of Kansas, and in the city jail thereof.

"2. The cause or pretense of the restraint of this petitioner according to the best of the knowledge and belief of the applicant, is as follows: On December 30, 1884, this petitioner was arrested by a policeman of said city of Leavenworth, upon a warrant issued by the police judge of said city, upon a complaint, of which the following is a copy:

"'THE STATE OF KANSAS, CITY AND COUNTY OF LEAVENWORTH. -- Police Court, sct. -- The City of Leavenworth v. C. F. W. Dassler -- W. D. Shallcross, being duly sworn, deposes and says: That C. F. W. Dassler is now and has been ever since January 1, 1884, a male resident and citizen of said city of Leavenworth, and is now and was during all of said time between the ages of twenty-one and forty-five years, and a registered voter of said city, and that said Dassler unlawfully neglects and refuses to perform two days' labor, or any part thereof, upon the streets, alleys and avenues of said city, and also unlawfully neglects and refuses to pay to the street commissioner of said city the sum of three dollars, or any part thereof, in lieu of said labor, and has during all of the time since January 1, 1884, so neglected and refused to perform said labor or pay said money in lieu thereof, although duly notified in writing so to do by the street commissioner of said city; and further saith not.

[Signed] W. D. SHALLCROSS.

"'Sworn to before me, and subscribed in my presence, this 30th day of December, 1884. -- M. L. HACKER, Police Judge.'

"On the 31st day of December, 1884, the case against said petitioner on said complaint was called for trial, and the petitioner moved to quash said complaint, because the same did not state a public offense under the constitution and laws of the state of Kansas, or the laws or ordinances of said city, and because said city of Leavenworth had no power to arrest, fine and imprison the petitioner for the non-payment of the road tax in said complaint mentioned, which motion was, by the police judge of said city, overruled. (A copy of the ordinance of said city of Leavenworth, in reference to the collection of road tax, is hereto attached, made a part hereof, and marked 'Exhibit A.') Thereupon said police judge, under protest of petitioner, proceeded to try the case, hear the evidence, and adjudged the petitioner guilty, and adjudged that petitioner pay a fine of five dollars, and stand committed to the city jail until said fine be paid, and issued a mittimus to the said W. D. Shallcross to that effect; and said petitioner was thereupon so imprisoned and restrained of his liberty by said city marshal, and still continues in said restraint, this petitioner refusing to pay said fine.

"3. The illegality of the said restraint consists in this, that -- 1st. Neither the said city of Leavenworth, nor said police judge, has power to enforce the collection of said road tax by arrest, fine and imprisonment; 2d. That if there be any pretended law on the statute book to that effect, the same is unconstitutional, null and void; 3d. That said police judge had no power to render the judgment for a fine, nor to issue a commitment to enforce the collection thereof; 4th. That the said ordinance under which said complaint was issued, and said proceedings were had, is void, so far as it provides for the arrest, fine and imprisonment of persons for the non-payment of road taxes; 5th. That the ordinance is repugnant to the constitution and laws of the state of Kansas.

"Wherefore, petitioner prays that his said imprisonment be inquired into, and if found illegal, that he be discharged therefrom."

EXHIBIT A.

"AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LABOR ON THE STREETS OF LEAVENWORTH CITY.

"Be it ordained by the Mayor and Councilmen of the City of Leavenworth:

"SECTION 1. (Repealed by ordinance 1044, post, § 905.)

"SEC. 897 -- City Clerk. Sec. 2. The city clerk shall deliver one copy of the duplicate list of persons registered, which he is required to make out by the thirty-fourth subdivision of section eleven of the city charter. to the street commissioner, and the other copy thereof to the city treasurer.

"SEC. 898. -- Street Commissioner. Sec. 3. After the duplicate list of persons registered has been delivered to the street commissioner, he shall from time to time, as work may in his judgment, or upon order of the city council, be required to be done, notify the persons upon said list, or so many thereof as may be necessary, to report to him at a time and place in said notice specified, which notice shall be either printed or written, or pay to him at said time and place the amount of money due for any delinquency in work, the same being for not less than one full day's labor.

"SEC. 899. -- Same. Sec. 4. The street commissioner shall also notify all other persons specified in the first section of this ordinance, whose names are not included in the list of registered persons in the same manner as herein provided for persons registered, and such persons shall be subject to all of the provisions of this ordinance, and the names of such additional persons shall be by the street commissioner forthwith furnished to the city treasurer.

"SEC. 900. -- Same; Failure. Sec. 5. Upon the failure of any person notified as herein prescribed, and no valid excuse being given to appear and perform said labor, or upon a failure to pay to the street commissioner the amount to be paid for such delinquency, the street commissioner shall mark opposite to his name upon the list furnished him by the city clerk, or made by himself, the words 'Notified and failed,' and such persons so failing shall, on due conviction thereof before the police judge, be fined in a sum not less than three dollars nor more than ten dollars for each day he so fails or refuses to work or to pay therefor, and the list of said street commissioner so marked 'Notified and failed,' shall be prima facie evidence of such notification and failure.

"SEC. 901. -- Receipt. Sec. 6. Upon doing the work required or payment of the money specified in this ordinance to be paid to the street commissioner, he shall mark on said list the words, 'Notified, worked, or paid,' and give the person so working or paying a receipt therefor.

"SEC. 902. -- Arrest. Sec. 7. It shall be the duty of the street commissioner to turn over the list of delinquents on Monday of each week to the city marshal, who shall thereupon cause such persons to be arrested and brought before the police judge for trial under provisions of this ordinance.

"SEC. 903. -- Moneys. Sec. 8. It shall be the duty of the street commissioner to turn over every day all moneys collected by him to the city treasurer, during the preceding one, and once each week to furnish the city treasurer with a list of those persons who have either performed the labor or paid the amount required by section one of this ordinance, and those who have been temporarily excused. The city treasurer shall furnish the city council at each regular meeting a true copy of all reports filed with him by the street commissioner since their last meeting.

"SEC. 904. Sec. 9. Any failure upon the part of the street commissioner or city marshal to perform their duties as specified in this ordinance shall be deemed sufficient cause for dismissal from office.

"SEC. 10. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its approval and publication.

"Approved, April 22, 1881; published, April 23, 1881."

"(1044.) AN ORDINANCE amending and repealing section one of ordinance No. 1008, entitled 'An ordinance relating to labor on the streets of Leavenworth city,' approved April 22, 1881.

"Be it ordained by the Mayor and Councilmen of the City of Leavenworth:

SEC. 905. -- Street Labor. Sec. 1. That section 1 of ordinance No. 1008, entitled 'An ordinance relating to labor on the streets of Leavenworth city,' approved April 22, 1881, be amended so as to read as follows: 'Sec. 1. Each male resident of the city of Leavenworth between the ages of twenty-one and forty-five years is hereby required in his own proper person each year, upon notice from the street commissioner, his deputy, or an officer appointed for that purpose, to perform two days' labor of ten hours each, on the streets, alleys or avenues of said city, under the direction and control of the street commissioner, or his deputies, or in lieu thereof shall pay to the street commissioner the sum of one dollar and fifty cents for each day.

"SEC. 906. -- Sec. 2. The original section one of this ordinance above referred to, is hereby repealed, but all actions and proceedings thereunder shall be carried out, the same as if this repeal had not been made.

"Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in force from and after its publication.

"Approved, October 5, 1882; published, October 7, 1882."

Upon such petition being filed, W. D. Shallcross, the respondent waived the issuance of the writ and entered his appearance, and for his return stated that C. F W. Dassler was restrained by him and held in his custody under the proceedings mentioned in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • United States v. Sugar
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 10 Julio 1917
    ...within the meaning either of the spirit or of the letter of the Constitution. As was pointed out by the court in the case of In re Dassler, 35 Kan. 678, 12 P. 130, in a contention that an ordinance requiring the performance of labor upon the public streets in lieu of taxes violated this ame......
  • Rosenbloom v. State
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 2 Abril 1902
    ... ... v. City of ... Denver , 21 Colo. 350, 41 P. 826; City of St. Louis ... v. Sternberg , 69 Mo. 289; Campbell v. City of ... Anthony , 40 Kan. 652, 20 P. 492; City of Bozeman v ... Cadwell , 14 Mont. 480, 36 P. 1042; City of ... Cincinnati v. Buckingham , 10 Ohio 257; In re ... Dassler , 35 Kan. 678, 12 P. 130. Limitations upon ... legislative power are to be found in written constitutions; ... it has not been customary to look for them in the opinions of ... the courts. When it pleased the people of this state to put ... an end to the ancient practice of seizing the person ... ...
  • Rosenbloom v. State
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • 2 Abril 1902
    ...v. Sternberg, 69 Mo. 289;City of Bozeman v. Cadwell (Mont.) 36 Pac. 1042;City of Cincinnati v. Buckingham, 10 Ohio, 257;In re Dassler, 35 Kan. 678, 12 Pac. 130. Limitations upon legislative power are to be found in written constitutions. It has not been customary to look for them in the opi......
  • City of Topeka v. Boutwell
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 9 Febrero 1894
    ...to the city jail, to work was no longer a subject of contention in this state, but it is questioned again in this case. In re Dassle 35 Kan. 678, 12 P. 130; State v. City Topeka, 36 Kan. 76, 12 P. 310; McCort, 52 Kan. __, 34 P. 456. In the latter case, it was expressly held by this court th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT