In re Delillo, Bankruptcy No. 80-00296-G

Decision Date25 August 1980
Docket NumberBankruptcy No. 80-00296-G,Adversary Proceeding No. 4-80-0074.
Citation5 BR 692
PartiesIn re Louis M. DELILLO, Debtor. Jon A. ASGEIRSSON, Plaintiff, v. Louis M. DELILLO, Defendant.
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Massachusetts

Jon A. Asgeirsson, Stoneham, Mass., pro se.

Carl D. Aframe, Worcester, Mass., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL W. GLENNON, Bankruptcy Judge.

On April 9, 1980, the debtor filed his petition pursuant to Title 11, Chapter 7 of the United States Code. The first meeting of creditors was held on May 8, 1980 and at that time, June 9, 1980 was set as the last day for filing complaints concerning objections.

On June 6, 1980, the plaintiff arrived after hours at the Bankruptcy Court. He slipped one copy of his complaint under the door where it was discovered at the opening of business on Monday, June 9, 1980. The papers were not complete, however, and the filing was defective because of failure to include the requisite fee and two additional copies of the complaint. Mr. Asgeirsson was contacted via telephone and, on June 12, 1980, corrected the filing deficiency.

On July 9, 1980, counsel for the debtor filed a motion to dismiss the complaint citing procedural deficiency in failing to file within the time period and for failing to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. He asserted that the final day for filing, June 8, fell on a Sunday so June 9 was the final day but the complaint was not filed until June 12, 1980. Additionally, he argues that the complaint seeks to have certain attorneys fees owed by the debtor to the plaintiff for services received in obtaining his divorce declared non-dischargeable as alimony.

Initially, I find the filing not to be defective. The final day for filing was the first business day, June 9, 1980, after the established date which fell on a Sunday. The complaint was here but was defective. The defect was cured on June 12, 1980.

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts adopted certain Local Interim Rules of Procedure. Rule 1010 deals with Defective filing and states in part:

. . . If amended to substantially comply with the rules or if the appropriate filing fee is paid within the ten days, the date of filing will be considered to be the date of the first presentation for filing.

Clearly, the rule requires that June 9, 1980, as it was the date of first presentation, should be the date of filing. This is within the appropriate time period and not late. Therefore, the Motion to Dismiss for late filing is DENIED.

The debtor has also claimed that the complaint by the plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. He claims that the monies owed to the plaintiff for the services performed when the plaintiff represented the debtor in his divorce proceeding prior to his bankruptcy are dischargeable.

The plaintiff asserts that his counsel fees are alimony1 and, additionally, that as a holder of a valid...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • In re Peterman
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 25 Agosto 1980
    ... ... Annemay Peterman KUZMINSKI, Plaintiff, ... George A. PETERMAN, Defendant ... Bankruptcy No. 79-02320G, Adv. No. 80-0128G ... United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania ... August ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT