In re Dubbiosi

Decision Date31 January 1961
Docket NumberMisc. No. 2937.
Citation191 F. Supp. 65
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
PartiesIn re Adorno DUBBIOSI, Deportation Proceedings.

Walter B. Martin, Jr., Norfolk, Va., for petitioner.

Joseph S. Bambacus, U. S. Atty., Roger T. Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richmond, Va., for respondent.

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The petitioner, Adorno Dubbiosi, having exhausted his administrative remedies, seeks judicial review of an order of deportation entered on April 16, 1959, as modified with respect to an immaterial point by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The order complained of is that Dubbiosi, prior to entry and at the time of entry into the United States, knowingly and for gain assisted, aided and abetted other aliens to attempt to enter the United States in violation of the law. § 241(a) (13), Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251(a) (13).

There is no dispute as to the material facts. Dubbiosi, a native of Monaco and citizen of Italy, was a member of the crew of the Italian vessel Enrico C which arrived at the Port of Hampton Roads on February 23, 1959. The Immigration Service, having received advance information to the effect that there may be stowaways aboard, proceeded to board the vessel. They examined the crew members in anticipation of granting shore leave. Dubbiosi, as a member of the crew, was given a D-1 landing permit which made him eligible to go ashore and thereafter depart on the same vessel. The issuance of this D-1 landing permit, standing alone, constituted an "entry" into the United States and, once having entered, Dubbiosi was then subject to deportation.

The sole issue turns upon the question of what constitutes an "entry" under the facts of this case. That Dubbiosi did aid, or attempt to aid, aliens who were not entitled to enter the United States is clear from the evidence.

At the time of the granting of the D-1 landing permits to the crewmen, including Dubbiosi, the Immigration Service had posted guards on the vessel and the crew members were not allowed to leave pending the completion of the search for the stowaways. It follows that, at the time the D-1 landing permit was issued to Dubbiosi, he was under physical restraint in the sense that his D-1 permit was not effective until the search had been completed. The stowaways having been located, and Dubbiosi implicated, he was then taken off the vessel under guard, arrested, and placed in jail.

The Immigration and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • United States v. Argueta-Rosales
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • April 12, 2016
    ...much explanation that § 1101(a)(13) had incorporated the preexisting judicial doctrine of official restraint. See, e.g., In re Dubbiosi, 191 F.Supp. 65, 66 (E.D.Va.1961) (acknowledging the adoption of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13) but stating that "[w]e do not believe, however, that this definitio......
  • Correa v. Thornburgh
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • April 20, 1990
    ...to enter the United States openly or surreptitiously. Vasilatos, 209 F.2d at 197; Lazarescu, 199 F.2d at 900-01; In Re Dubbiosi, 191 F.Supp. 65, 66 (E.D.Va.1961). Such restraint need not be by immigration officers. Edmond v. Nelson, 575 F.Supp. 532, 535 (E.D.La.1983) (aliens seeking entry b......
  • U.S. v. Cruz-Escoto
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • February 23, 2007
    ...United States v. Oscar, 496 F.2d 492, 493 (9th Cir.1974) (citing United States v. Vasilatos, 209 F.2d 195 (3d Cir.1954); In re Dubbiosi, 191 F.Supp. 65 (E.D.Va.1961)). In Oscar, two aliens who attempted to enter by lying to inspectors at a port of entry, claiming that they were U.S. citizen......
  • Matter of G----
    • United States
    • U.S. DOJ Board of Immigration Appeals
    • December 8, 1993
    ...(3d Cir. 1954); United States v. Lazarescu, 104 F. Supp. 771, 777 (D. Md.), aff'd, 199 F.2d 898, 900 (4th Cir. 1952); In re Dubbiosi, 191 F. Supp. 65, 66 (E.D. Va. 1961). For example, although the exact number may never be known, several of the ship's occupants, presumably the first to jump......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT