In re Estate of Edwards

Docket NumberDA 16-0137
Decision Date25 April 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • In re Estate of Erickson
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • October 31, 2017
    ... ... The PR contested the 6 Point Document as a second codicil while defending the probate of the Will and Codicil. In re Estate of Edwards, 2017 MT 93, 85-90, 387 Mont. 274, 393 P.3d 639. The PR defended the probate of the Will pursuant to Gail's motion, and the Will and Codicil in probate were confirmed. If a party successfully defends a will, he is entitled to both attorney fees and costs. In re Estate of Edwards, 87. The PR is ... ...
  • Comm'r of Political Practices for Mont. v. Wittich
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • August 23, 2017
    ... ... 's substantial right "is not affected unless the challenged evidence is of such character to have affected the result of the case." In re Estate of Edwards , 2017 MT 93, 50, 387 Mont. 274, 393 P.3d 639 (citation and internal quotations omitted). Although Commissioner Motl offered some legal ... ...
  • Grenz v. Grenz (In re Grenz)
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • August 31, 2020
    ... 948 N.W.2d 320 In the MATTER OF the ESTATE OF Leo GRENZ, Deceased Kelly Grenz, personal representative of the Estate of Leo Grenz, deceased, Petitioner and Appellant v. Donavin Grenz, David ... to be considered and correlated with the alleged acts of influence to determine if the acts amount to undue influence." Matter of Estate of Edwards , 2017 MT 93, 56, 387 Mont. 274, 393 P.3d 639 (internal citations omitted). 52] This court has cautioned against seeking evidence of a testator's ... ...
  • Maier v. Wilson
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • December 28, 2017
    ... ... Evid. 103. A substantial right of a party is not affected unless the challenged evidence would have affected the result of the case. In re Estate of Edwards , 2017 MT 93, 50, 387 Mont. 274, 393 P.3d 639. Cross-examination is a substantial right and may not be unduly restricted. McGonigle v ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT