In Re Estate Of Clarence A. Warden
Decision Date | 13 September 2010 |
Citation | 2 A.3d 565 |
Court | Pennsylvania Superior Court |
Parties | In re ESTATE OF Clarence A. WARDEN, Deceased. Appeal of Charles LeMenestrel & Genevieve LeMenestrel-Manas. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED.
Louis J. Sinatra, Philadelphia, for appellants.
Thomas S. Biemer, Philadelphia, for Wachovia Bank, Participating Party.
Gary R. Battistoni, Philadelphia, for Warden, Participating Party.
¶ 1 Appellants, Charles LeMenestrel and Genevieve LeMenestrel-Manas (“Appellants”), appeal from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, which overruled their objections to the accounting and denied their claim for imposition of a surcharge on the Trustees, William G. Warden III (“Warden III”) and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (“Wachovia”) (collectively, “Trustees”). We hold that under these facts, Trustees acted in good faith and did not engage in intentionally dishonest behavior. Finally, we hold that under the facts of this case, acquiescence and laches bars Appellants' claims. Accordingly, we affirm.
¶ 2 The trial court set forth the background:
The retention and investment of Trust property was designated a discretionary act by the Settlor, who expressly provided that his Trustees would have no liability for the exercise thereof, so long as they acted in good faith:
Trial Ct. Op. at 4-7 (citations and footnotes omitted); see generally Lemenestrel v. Warden, 964 A.2d 902 (Pa.Super.2008), appeal denied, 603 Pa. 695, 983 A.2d 729 (2009).
¶ 3 In 1987, Warden III successfully petitioned the trial court to become the successor Trustee to his father. Trial Ct. Op. at 7. All present and future beneficiaries consented to this appointment. Id. at 8. Warden III is also an income beneficiary of the Trust with a twenty-five percent interest. Id. at 10. Appellants, on the other hand, Id. at 11. The accounting period at issue was from January 1, 1987, through July 30, 2004. Appellants' interest vested in the year 2000. Id. at 10.
¶ 4 The trial court provides a detailed history of SGI from its founding in 1931 to the present that we do not recount here. See id. at 11-28. SGI's value has fluctuated throughout the company's life, which affects the Trust's performance. “[D]uring [Wachovia's] administration of this Trust, the Trust's principal income in SGI has increased from $1.5 Million at the time of its inception to at least $189 Million[.]” Id. at 67.
Id. at 36-38 (citations omitted). An accounting was filed; Appellants filed objections. A sixteen-day trifurcated trial ensued.
¶ 5 On February 26, 2009, the trial court overruled Appellants' objections and denied Appellants' claim for a surcharge. On April 1, 2009, the trial court entered a final adjudication, and Appellants timely appealed on April 14, 2009.
¶ 6 Appellants raise the following issues: Whether the trustees acted in good faith and properly discharged their fiduciary duties in monitoring and retaining the SGI stock?
¶ 7 The standard for reviewing an Orphan's Court findings is deferential. In re Estate of Harrison, 745 A.2d 676, 678 (Pa.Super.2000).
The findings of a judge of the orphans' court division, sitting without a jury, must be accorded the same weight and effect as the verdict of a jury, and will not be reversed by an appellate...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Becker v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co., N.A.
...who holds title to the property to duties to deal with it for the benefit of ... one or more persons”). Accord In re Estate of Warden, 2 A.3d 565, 572 (Pa.Super.Ct.2010), appeal denied, 610 Pa. 580, 17 A.3d 1255 (2011) (citing In re Trust of Hirt, 832 A.2d 438, 447–48 (Pa.Super.Ct.2003), ap......
-
Pa. Envtl. Def. Found. v. Commonwealth
...primary duty of a trustee is the preservation of the assets of the trust and the safety of the trust principal.”In re Estate of Warden, 2 A.3d 565, 572 (Pa.Super.2010) (first three alterations in original) (citations omitted) (quoting In re Trust of Hirt, 832 A.2d 438, 447–48 (Pa.Super.2003......
-
Gallo v. Palmiter (In re Palmiter)
...546 (Pa.Super. 2014). Generally, the settlor's intent is determined by considering the trust document as a whole. In re Estate of Warden , 2 A.3d 565, 572 (Pa.Super. 2010). Mere contractual relationships are less than what is required to establish the existence of a fiduciary relationship f......
-
In re Estate of Haburcak
...856 A.2d 165, 167 (Pa. Super. 2004) (quoting In re Estate of Schultheis, 747 A.2d 918, 922 (Pa. Super. 2000)).In re Estate of Warden, 2 A.3d 565, 571 (Pa. Super. 2010).When the trial court has come to a conclusion through the exercise of its discretion, the party complaining on appeal has a......