In re Estate of Wimberley
| Decision Date | 29 January 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 31757–9–III. |
| Citation | In re Estate of Wimberley, 349 P.3d 11, 186 Wash.App. 475 (Wash. App. 2015) |
| Parties | In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Margaret WIMBERLEY, Deceased. |
| Court | Washington Court of Appeals |
Kameron Lee Kirkevold, Helsell Fetterman LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Cam C. McGillivray, Northwest Trustee & Management Services, Spokane, WA, Linda Ann Sellers, Sara L. Watkins, Halverson Northwest PC, Yakima, WA, for Respondent.
¶ 1 Two brothers, James and Wesley Wimberley, quarrel over assets in their parents' trusts.The trial court removed James Wimberley as the successor trustee of the trusts and personal representative of the estate of the mother, Margaret Wimberley.James Wimberley's successor trustee, Stephen Trefts, performed an accounting and concluded that James over-distributed to himself the amount of $254,437.91 in trust assets.Trefts petitioned the trial court for approval of the accounting.
James appeals the trial court's approval and order directing him to reinstate $254,437.91 to the mother's trust and estate.We affirm all trial court orders.
¶ 2 C.W. and Margaret Wimberley married on July 7, 1945.They bore and raised two children, Carroll Wesley Wimberley(Wesley) and James Keith Wimberley(James).C.W. and Margaret Wimberleys' estate planning process spanned the course of many years.This statement of facts follows the creation and administration of a family trust and changes to the trust, after the death of husband C.W. Wimberley, with Wesley or James lurking in the background.
¶ 3 On August 17, 1967, C.W. and Margaret executed a community property agreement designating all property owned or later acquired by the couple as community property.On January 15, 1999, the couple created a revocable living trust: “The Wimberley Family Trust, C.W. Wimberley and Margaret Wimberley, Trustor and/or Trustees”(Trust).The Trust identified C.W. and Margaret as trustors, one of them as survivor trustee upon the death of the first spouse, and beneficiaries while living.The Trust named James and Wesley Wimberley as heirs and primary beneficiaries.The trust designated James as successor trustee, upon the deaths of C.W. and Margaret.As trustors, C.W. and Margaret Wimberley retained the power to make amendments to the Trust or change its beneficiaries, but only as long as both remained alive.
¶ 4 The Wimberley Family Trust, like many family trusts, contained A–B–C trust provisions.The instrument directed the surviving trustee of C.W. and Margaret Wimberley to divide the Trust equally into two shares: Survivor's Trust A (Survivor's Trust) and Decedent's Marital Share (“Decedent's Trust B” and “Decedent's Trust C”), upon the death of the first spouse.The purpose behind this division was to avoid or limit estate taxes.
¶ 5 The Wimberley Family Trust instrument read:
Clerk's Papers(CP)at 138–39(emphasis added).
¶ 6 Under the Trust document, Decedent's Trusts B and C would pay their net income to the surviving spouse, while the principal of Trusts B and C could pay for the survivor's health care, education, support, and maintenance.Decedent Trust B also allowed, at the surviving spouse's request, a year-end principal payment of $5,000 or 5 percent of the trust's aggregate value.
¶ 7 C.W. and Margaret desired to place all their assets in the Trust.The Wimberley Family Trust instrument read:
CPat 114.A 1999 deed placed title to real property in the Wimberley Family Trust.Numerous financial account statements designated the trust as the account holder.
¶ 8 The Wimberley Family Trust instrument mentioned the possibility of loans from the parents to James and Wesley and directed that such loans be forgiven upon the death of the parents, but reduce the debtor son's distribution of trust assets.The instrument read:
CPat 158.No gifts or loans were ever recorded in Schedule A.
¶ 9 At the time of executing the trust instrument, C.W. and Margaret signed wills.Both wills contain “pour-over” provisions that:
give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my property of every kind and description (including lapsed legacies and devises), wherever situated and whether acquired before or after the execution of this Will, to the Trustee under that certain Trust executed by me, which is known as “The Wimberley Family Trust.”
CPat 359.A pour-over will is a testamentary device wherein the writer of a will creates a trust and decrees in the will that the property in his or her estate, at the time of his or her death, shall be distributed to the trustee of the trust.
¶ 10 The Wimberleys also articulated their wishes in a Letter of Intent and Declaration of Gift, executed as part of the Family Trust:
¶ 11C.W. Wimberley died on January 20, 2002, rendering Margaret Wimberley, at the age of 85, the Trust's survivor trustee.The Trust instrument directed her to divide the trust in half, with one-half becoming Trusts B and C.Margaret never divided the Trust into the Survivor and Decedent's trusts.
¶ 12 On July 18, 2007, five years after the death of C.W., Margaret Wimberley amended the Wimberley Family Trust “so as to fully comply with the Trust Laws of the State of Washington.”CPat 178.Richard C. Greiner, a Yakima estate planning attorney, drafted the amendment.The 2007amendment contained provisions that contradict key provisions of the original Trust.
¶ 13The 2007amendment stated in...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Rental Hous. Ass'n v. City of Seattle
... ... Id. Unpaid rent accrues interest at a default rate of 12 percent per annum when the parties agreement does not provide otherwise. In re Estate of Wimberley , 186 Wash. App. 475, 511, 349 P.3d 11 (2015). 29 The ordinance prohibiting the accrual of prejudgment interest on unpaid rents violates ... ...
-
Rental Hous. Ass'n v. City of Seattle
... ... Id. Unpaid rent accrues interest at a default rate of 12 percent per annum when the parties agreement does not provide otherwise. In re Estate of Wimberley , 186 Wash. App. 475, 511, 349 P.3d 11 (2015). 32 The ordinance prohibiting the accrual of prejudgment interest on unpaid rents violates ... ...
- Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1384 v. Kitsap Transit
-
Bus. Fin. Corp. v. Knoll
... BUSINESS FINANCE CORP., a Washington corporation, Respondent, v. VICTORIA KNOLL, THE ESTATE OF CRAIG KNOLL; THE UNKNOWN HEIRS OF CRAIG KNOLL, deceased; CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC., NORTHWEST, an inactive Washington Corporation; TRUSERV ... the same parties and covering the same subject matter, but containing inconsistent terms, rescinds the earlier contract." In re Estate of Wimberley , 186 Wn. App. 475, 505, 349 P.3d 11 (2015) (citing Higgins v. Stafford , 123 Wn.2d 160, 165-66, 866 P.2d 31 (1994) rev ... denied , 183 Wn.2d 1023, ... ...
-
§ 5.01 Agreements as to the Character of Property
...plan if the couple later chose to revoke the community property agreement. Id. at 400. In In re Estate of Wimberley, 186 Wn. App. 475, 349 P.3d 11 (2015), the couple signed a community property agreement in 1967, and in 1999 signed a Revocable Living Trust Agreement and pour-over wills. The......
-
Table of Cases
...(1925): 3.3(1)(d) Wells, In re Guardianship of, 150 Wn.App. 491, 208 P.3d 1126 (2009): 13.1(5) Wemberly, In re Estate of, 186 Wn.App. 475, 349 P.3d 11 (2015): 13.7(5)(e) West v. Knowles, 50 Wn.2d 311, 311 P.2d 689 (1957): 13.4(8)(b) West v. Stanfield, 48 Wn.2d 55, 290 P.2d 704 (1955): 4.3(1......
-
Chapter A. General Rules of Construction and Interpretation
...of fact. In re Estate of Hayes, 185 Wn.App. 567, 609, 342 P.3d 1161 (2015); see also In re Estate of Wimberley, 186 Wn.App. 475, 510, 349 P.3d 11, review denied, 183 Wn.2d 1023 (2015) (trust); Niemann v. Vaughn Cmty Church, 154 Wn.2d 365, 374-75, 113 P.3d 463 (2005) (testamentary trust). 6 ......
-
Chapter I. Community Property Agreements
...such that they could not coexist, and the later wills prevailed. Id. at 404; see also In re Estate of Wimberley, 186 Wn. App. 475, 504-05, 349 P.3d 11, review denied, 183 Wn.2d 1023 355 In re Marriage of Schweitzer, 132 Wn.2d 318, 328, 937 P.2d 1062 (1997). 356 Id. Parol evidence cannot be ......