In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for Puerto Rico
Citation | 635 B.R. 201 |
Decision Date | 29 October 2021 |
Docket Number | No. 17 BK 3283-LTS (Jointly Administered),17 BK 3283-LTS (Jointly Administered) |
Parties | IN RE: The FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, as representative of The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al., Debtors. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Puerto Rico |
MCCONNELL VALDÉS LLC, By: Arturo J. García-Solá, Nayuan Zouairabani, 270 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 7, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918, PO Box 364225, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-4225, Attorneys for AmeriNational Community Services, LLC as servicer for the GDB Debt Recovery Authority.
C. CONDE & ASSOC. LAW OFFICES, By: Carmen D. Conde Torres, Luisa S. Valle Castro, 254 San José Street, Suite 5, San Juan, PR 00901-1523, SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP, By: Douglas S. Mintz, Noah N. Gillespie, 901 Fifteenth Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005 and Douglas Koff, Abbey Walsh, Peter J. Amend, 919 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022, Attorneys for Cantor-Katz Collateral Monitor LLC, as Collateral Monitor for GDB Debt Recovery Authority.
O'NEILL & BORGES LLC, By: Hermann D. Bauer, 250 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 800, San Juan, PR 00918-1813, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, By: Martin J. Bienenstock, Ehud Barak, Jeffrey W. Levitan, Joshua A. Esses, Eleven Times Square, New York, NY 10036, Attorneys for the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, as representative of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
PROMESA
Pending before the Court is The DRA Parties’ Motion for Allowance of an Administrative Expense Claim (Docket Entry No. 17009 in Case No. 17-03283-LTS,2 the "Motion") filed by AmeriNational Community Services, LLC (the "Servicer"), as servicer for the GDB Debt Recovery Authority (the "DRA"), and Cantor-Katz Collateral Monitor LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Collateral Monitor," and together with the Servicer, the "DRA Parties"). The Motion requests allowance of an administrative expense claim in the Commonwealth Title III Case pursuant to section 503(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(A),3 and the "fundamental fairness" doctrine derived from Reading Co. v. Brown, 391 U.S. 471, 88 S.Ct. 1759, 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968).
The Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico (the "Oversight Board"), acting as the statutory representative of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico under Title III of PROMESA, filed an objection to the Motion (Docket Entry No. 18065, the "Objection"), and the DRA Parties filed a reply in support of the Motion. (Docket Entry No. 18888-1, the "Reply").
The Court, which has subject matter jurisdiction of this action pursuant to section 306(a) of PROMESA, 48 U.S.C. § 2166(a), has carefully reviewed the papers submitted in connection with the Motion.4 For the following reasons, the Motion is denied.
Except as otherwise indicated, the following are undisputed facts alleged in the Motion or drawn from the documents cited or annexed therein.
HTA was established as a public corporation by Act No. 74-1965 to facilitate the construction and maintenance of roads and other transportation infrastructure. See 9 L.P.R.A. § 2002. Pursuant to its enabling act (the "HTA Enabling Act"), HTA is statutorily authorized to borrow money and issue bonds. 9 L.P.R.A. § 2004(l).
Between March 2008 and January 2014, HTA executed fifteen loan agreements (the "GDB/HTA Loans") with the Government Development Bank of Puerto Rico (the "GDB"), and HTA issued twenty-three promissory notes evidencing the indebtedness. (Mot. ¶ 5; Obj. ¶ 13.)
On August 28, 2013, HTA and GDB executed an Assignment and Security Agreement (Docket Entry No. 16276-23, the "Security Agreement"). (Mot. ¶ 7; Obj. ¶ 14.) Pursuant to the Security Agreement, HTA assigned to GDB, as "security for the prompt and complete payment and performance when due of all of its Obligations," its ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R.
...Johnson v. Home State Bank, 501 U.S. 78, 83, 111 S.Ct. 2150, 115 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991) ); In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R., Case No. 17 BK-3283-LTS, 635 B.R. 201, 212-15 (D.P.R. Oct. 29, 2021). The discharge of prepetition obligations does not need to be approved pursuant to, or consis......