In re A.E. Fountain, Inc., 182
Decision Date | 03 July 1922 |
Docket Number | 303.,182 |
Citation | 282 F. 816 |
Parties | In re A. E. FOUNTAIN, Inc. In re CARL DERNBURG & SONS, Inc. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
In the first case, the bankrupt, an importer, manufacturer, and dealer in dolls, borrowed $3,000 from the respondent on March 9, 1921, giving a demand note and as security therefor a document, purporting to be a trust receipt of certain merchandise then owned by and in possession of the bankrupt which read as follows:
'We agree to keep said goods insured to their full value against fire, payable in case of loss to the said Bank of the Manhattan Company, with the understanding that they are not to be chargeable with the storage, premiums of insurance, or any other expenses incurred on said goods. We further agree that no failure or omission on our part to fully carry out any of the terms of this or any similar receipt or agreement, or of the agreement under which the said Bank of the Manhattan Company, makers of the loan of $3,000, shall be deemed a waiver by said bank of any of its rights or remedies, under either or any of said papers, unless said waiver shall be in writing, indorsed thereon, and signed by the said bank.
'The Bank of the Manhattan Company may at any time cancel this trust, and take possession of said goods, and of the proceeds of such of the same as may then have been sold, wherever the said goods or proceeds may then be found. The intention of said agreement is to protect, and preserve unimpaired, the title of said Bank of the Manhattan Company to the said merchandise and the proceeds thereof.
aside in accordance with trust receipt, dated March 9, 1921, to secure demand
loan of $3,000 of the same date.
A. E. Fountain, Inc.
'A. E. Fountain, Jr., Treas.'
A. E. Fountain, Jr., the treasurer of the bankrupt, who executed the trust receipt on its behalf, has made affidavit that:
In the affidavit of A. E. Fountain, Sr., the president of the bankrupt, he has stated:
On July 20, 1921, an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against A. E. Fountain, Inc. Robert P. Stephenson was appointed receiver, and there were found among the assets of the company 30 dolls less of style No. 198, 79 less of style No. 200, and 79 dolls less of style No. 201C, than the number of dolls of those styles set forth in the schedule annexed to the trust receipt. John S. Baker, a vice president of the bank, has stated in his affidavit that, shortly before the petition in bankruptcy was filed, A. E. Fountain, Jr., informed him 'that he was at any time able to pick out the merchandise called for in said trust receipt. ' The debt due the bank remained unpaid, and the latter demanded of the receiver that he deliver possession to the bank of the merchandise on hand mentioned in the schedule. This demand was refused, whereupon a petition was filed in the District Court, praying for such delivery, and an order was made directing delivery, from which this appeal was taken.
It seems evident from the foregoing syllabus of the affidavits filed in the District Court that the merchandise sought to be covered by the trust receipt was ostensibly part of the stock in trade of A. E. Fountain, Inc., and was essentially treated as such.
In the second case. the Irving National Bank loaned $10,000 on June 4, 1921, to the copartnership of Carl Dernburg & Son taking their promissory note for that amount, with interest, and as security a negotiable warehouse receipt for certain fox skins, indorsed in blank by the partnership. Thereafter, and while the debt was still due, the corporation of Carl Dernburg & Sons, Inc., was organized and took over all the assets and liabilities of the partnership. On August 26, 1921, the bank issued to the corporation a delivery order for 1,337 of the fox skins embraced in the warehouse receipt, which the bank held to secure the loan that was still unpaid, and took back from the corporation a so-called trust receipt, the material clauses whereof were as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Globe Securities Co. v. Gardner Motor Co.
... ... Gardner Motor Company, Inc., a Corporation, Gardner-Paup Motors, Inc., a Corporation, and Motor ... R. 937; Edwards v ... Baldwin Piano Co., 79 Fla. 143; In re Fountain, ... 282 F. 816; Canal-Commercial Trust & Sav. Bank v. New ... The facts ... are neither contradicted [337 Mo. 182] nor disputed. The ... dispute is alone upon the legal effect of the ... ...
-
In re Ford-Rennie Leather Co., 509.
... ... In re FORD-RENNIE LEATHER CO. Petition of SCHMOLL FILS & CO., Inc., Petition of DOHERR GRIMM & CO., Inc ... No. 509 ... District ... Ct. 194, 60 L. Ed. 417, Ann. Cas. 1917E, 25; In re A. E. Fountain, Inc. (C. C. A. 2) 282 F. 816 ... The legal relations ... ...
-
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Sharp Motor Sales Co.
... ... In ... re A. E. Fountain, Inc. (C. C. A.) 282 F. 816, 25 A. L ... R. 319; In re Ford-Rennie ... appellant. Starr Piano Co. v. Petrey, 168 Ky. 530, ... 182 S.W. 624; Mason, etc., v. Scruggs, 207 Ky. 66, ... 268 S.W. 833 ... ...
-
Greenwich Bank v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford
... ... 120]CRANE, J.The Alexandre Works, Inc., a domestic corporation, was engaged in business on Stewart avenue, ... Matter of A. E. Fountain, Inc. (C. C. A.) 282 F. 816. Under the terms of the policies of insurance, ... ...