In re Francisco D. Medina-Espinosa Elidelia Andujar-Ocasio
Decision Date | 18 May 2015 |
Docket Number | CASE NO. 13-04255 (ESL) |
Parties | IN RE: FRANCISCO D. MEDINA-ESPINOSA ELIDELIA ANDUJAR-OCASIO Debtors |
Court | U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of Puerto Rico |
This case is before the court upon the Application for Compensation of Attorney for Debtor[s] (the "Application for Compensation", Docket No. 56) filed by Almeida & Davila, P.S.C.1 (the "Applicant") for the unpaid balance of $1,1749.00 over the $3,150.00 already paid by the Chapter 13 Trustee, which includes the $3,000 "no-look" fee afforded in P.R. LBR 2016-1(f)(1). Also before the court is the Opposition filed by the Chapter 13 Trustee (Docket No. 57) sustaining that: (a) some of the charges are clerical, secretarial and/or paralegal in nature; (b) the Application for Compensation is untimely considering that the Applicant is requesting fees for pre-filing and pre and post-confirmation services rendered; (c) "the evaluation of [the] Application for Compensation of post-confirmation services cannot be postponed until nine (9) months after the confirmation is entered in a Chapter 13 case" because "doing so will have the unintended effect of altering the terms of the plan bypassing the statutory mechanism of 11 U.S.C. § 1329"; and (d) the binding effect of the confirmation order is "res judicata with respect to all issues that were or could have been litigated at or before the confirmation hearing on confirmation". For the reasons stated below, the Application for Compensation is hereby denied.
The Debtors filed their Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition on May 25, 2013 (Docket No. 1) along with the Chapter 13 Plan (Docket No. 2). In the Disclosure for Compensation ofAttorney, the Applicant disclosed under 11 U.S.C. § 329(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016(b) as follows:
They also disclosed the following:
The meeting of creditors was held and closed on June 28, 2013 (Docket Nos. 8 and 14). On that same date, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed an unfavorable recommendation (Docket No. 14).
After filing Amended Schedules B and C and their Statement of Financial Affairs (Docket Nos. 15, 16 and 17), on July 5, 2013, the Debtors filed an Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Docket No. 18). Section II of the Amended Chapter 13 Plan provides for a total compensation for Attorney's Fees in the amount of $3,000.00 to be treated as priority under 11 U.S.C. § 507 as follows:
a. |
Rule 20106(b) Statement |
$3,000.00 |
b. |
Fees paid (pre-petition) |
$200.00 |
c. |
R 2016 Outstanding Balance |
$2,800.00 |
d. |
Post-Petition Additional Fees |
$0.00 |
e. |
Total Compensation |
$3, |
Docket No. 18, Section II, p. 1 (emphasis added).
On July 9, 2013, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed a favorable recommendation for confirmation (Docket No. 21).
On August 12, 2013, the court entered an Order Confirming Plan which provides as follows in regards to the allowance of debtors' attorney's fees:
The application for the allowance of reasonable compensation as authorized by 11 U.S.C. 330, having been considered, the court finds that a reasonable fee for theservices performed and undertaken by such attorney is $3,000.00. Such fee, less any retainer, shall be paid by the trustee from the monies received under the debtor's plan, provided, however that such payments be deferred in time to payments which may be required to provide adequate protection of the interest of the holders of secured claims.
Docket No. 23, lines 17-20 (emphasis added).
On September 13, 2013, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed a Motion to Modify Plan requesting that it be amended because it "fails to present value test" and "must distribute at least $3,023, among general unsecured creditors" (Docket No. 25, p. 1, ¶ 2).
On October 7, 2013, the Debtors filed an Amended Schedule J increasing their Chapter 13 plan base (Docket No. 32) and an Opposition to Trustee's Motion to Modify Plan (Docket No. 33).
On October 8, 2013, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed a Notice of Withdrawal Motion to Modify (Docket No. 34) and a favorable recommendation on the post-confirmation modification of the Plan dated July 3, 2013 (Docket No. 35).
On May 7, 2014, the Applicant filed the Application for Compensation (Docket No. 56) for the unpaid balance of $1,1749.00 over the $3,150.00 already paid by the Chapter 13 Trustee, which includes the $3,000 "no-look" fee afforded in P.R. LBR 2016-1(f)(1).
On May 22, 2014, the Chapter 13 Trustee filed an Opposition to Application for Compensation (the "Opposition", Docket No. 57) sustaining that: (a) some of the charges are clerical, secretarial and/or paralegal in nature; (b) the Application for Compensation is untimely considering that the Applicant is requesting fees for pre-filing and pre and post confirmation services rendered; (c) "the evaluation of [the] Application for Compensation of post-confirmation services cannot be postponed until nine (9) months after the confirmation is entered in a Chapter 13 case" because "doing so will have the unintended effect of altering the terms of the plan bypassing the statutory mechanism of 11 U.S.C. § 1329"; and (d) the binding effect of the confirmation order is "res judicata with respect to all issues that were or could have been litigated at or before the confirmation hearing on confirmation". The Chapter 13 Trustee also requests that the court enters an "order expressing and adopting that the bestpractice for debtor's attorneys seeking compensation beyond the 'no-look' fee for pre-confirmation services is to file an application before the confirmation of the plan" and that "in those cases where for good cause debtor's counsel may not file an application for compensation prior to the confirmation of the plan, the court should set a deadline, to be applied in the instant case and in future cases, to be no later than 30 days from the date the confirmation order is entered".
On July 15, 2014, the Applicant filed a Reply to Trustee's Opposition to Application for Compensation (Docket No. 63) sustaining that: (a) the Chapter 13 seeks an "advisory opinion ... concerning future cases"; (b) the compensation scheme provided by the Bankruptcy Code contemplates compensation for tasks performed by paralegal personnel"; (c) "the court may award reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered by the trustee, examiner, ombudsman, professional person, or attorney and by any paraprofessional person employed by any such person", including clerical or support personnel services; (d) such services may be "allocated to one client in particular"; (e) the services " were performed for the direct benefit of the specific clients billed for them", in the instant case, the Debtors; (f) "courts have viewed clerical work as part of the overhead expenses incurred by a professional, when it is an expense which is billed in the hourly rate of the professional, and in those situations it is non-compensable"; (g) the paralegal work was "billed separately, with a description of the task performed by the hour with a fixed rate of $85.00 as detailed in the Disclosure of Compensation of Attorney for Debtor(s) pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329(a), and the Bankruptcy Rule 2016(b) which accompanied debtor's Voluntary Chapter 13 petition"; (h) "nothing in the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules or the Guidelines vest in the Trustee the authority to act as a Law Firm's administrator or person who directs how the Firm's services to clients will be...
To continue reading
Request your trial