In re Gaslight, Coal & Coke Co.
Decision Date | 01 November 1917 |
Docket Number | Appellate Court 9,124 |
Parties | In re Aurora Gaslight, Coal and Coke Company |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Petition to Transfer Cause to Supreme Court Denied April 6 1917.
From Dearborn Circuit Court; Warren N. Hauck, Judge.
In the matter of the assessment of the Aurora Gaslight, Coal and Coke Company. Petition to transfer cause from the Appellate Court under § 1394, cl. 2, Burns 1914.
Petition denied.
McMullen & McMullens and A. C. Harris, for appellant.
Givan & Givan, for appellee.
It is provided in § 1392 Burns 1914, Acts 1907 p. 237, that all appealable cases, except those expressly mentioned therein, shall be taken to the Appellate Court, and in § 1394 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 565, it is further provided that , etc. In view of the latter statute, this court, under proper circumstances, is authorized to review the decision of the Appellate Court in a cause which, in the first instance, is appealable only to the Appellate Court, but before the losing party may invoke such jurisdiction it is incumbent on him, within thirty days after his petition for a rehearing has been overruled by the Appellate Court, to file in this court a proper application for the transfer of such cause. This application is jurisdictional and must, therefore, set forth such facts as are necessary to show that the petitioner has brought himself within the statute. These facts are: (1) That the Appellate Court has decided the case, or some material part thereof, against the party who asks that the case be transferred, and has overruled a petition for a rehearing duly presented by such party; (2) that a written opinion was filed by the Appellate Court setting forth the reasons on which its judgment is based; (3) that such opinion contravenes a ruling precedent of this court, or erroneously decides a new question of law, either or both of which objections if desired to be presented must be particularly pointed out; and (4) that the petition for a rehearing and the application to transfer were each...
To continue reading
Request your trial- In re Petition To Transfer Appeals
-
Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L.R. Co. v. Hoffman
...Court examining the record to determine such facts, in view of this section and section 1356, Burns' 1926. In re Aurora Gaslight, etc., Co., 186 Ind. 690, 115 N. E. 673. The petition does not allege such necessary facts, and therefore presents no question for the determination of this court......
-
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago And St. Louis Railroad Co. v. Hoffman
... ... of this section and § 1356 Burns 1926. In re Aurora ... Gaslight Co. (1917), 186 Ind. 690, 115 N.E. 673. The ... petition does not allege such necessary facts ... ...
-
| In re Petitions To Transfer Appeals From Appellate Court To Supreme Court
... ... disclosed by the record. In re Aurora Gaslight, etc., ... Co. (1917), 186 Ind. 690, 115 N.E. 673; Julian ... v. Bliss (1925), 196 Ind. 68, ... ...