In re Genesis Health Clubs, 99,772.
Citation | 210 P.3d 663 |
Decision Date | 02 July 2009 |
Docket Number | No. 99,772.,99,772. |
Parties | In the Matter of the Appeals of GENESIS HEALTH CLUBS from Orders of the Division of Taxation for Sales Tax. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Kansas |
Gerald N. Capps, of Andover, for appellant.
James Bartle, general counsel, and David J. Dunlap, of Legal Services Bureau, Kansas Department of Revenue, for appellee.
Before GREENE, P.J., PIERRON and GREEN, JJ.
Genesis Health Clubs (Genesis) appeals a summary judgment entered against it by the Kansas Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA), holding that certain purchases of tangible personal property were not consumed in the providing of taxable services and therefore not exempt under K.S.A.2008 Supp. 79-3606(n) and that such purchases also did not become an ingredient or component part of taxable services and therefore not exempt under K.S.A.2008 Supp. 79-3606(m). We agree with BOTA and affirm the judgment against Genesis.
Genesis is a private, for-profit health club with four locations in Wichita, Kansas. Genesis sells memberships that allow either all-inclusive or limited access to its various locations and services. A membership entitles the member to access Genesis' facilities and to take part in the services offered, depending on the membership class. Some services require an additional prepaid fee. Beyond these membership and prepaid fees, members are not charged for their actual use of specific facilities or any aspect thereof.
BOTA summarized, and there is no apparent challenge regarding, Genesis' purchase and use of property for which exemption has been sought:
Genesis charged, collected, and remitted Kansas retailers sales tax on all monthly dues for services offered subject to Kansas sales tax. On December 2, 2002, Genesis filed refund claims with Kansas Department of Revenue (KDR) for taxes paid on certain items purchased by Genesis from November 1999 through August 2002, including: (1) electricity; (2) natural gas; (3) water; (4) pool chemicals; (5) laundry detergent; (6) hand and bath towels; (7) soap and shampoo; (8) a sprinkler inspection; and (9) printing costs for the quarterly newsletter Genesis mails to its members and provides in the lobby area of at least two of its locations. Genesis sought exemption pursuant to K.S.A. 2008 Supp. 79-3606(m) and (n) for these items. KDR denied the exemption, and the Secretary of Revenue's designee upheld KDR's decision.
Genesis appealed KDR's decision to BOTA. An officer of BOTA's small claims division denied Genesis' refund request, and Genesis appealed to the full board. KDR filed a motion for summary judgment, and Genesis filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. Ultimately, BOTA issued an order granting KDR's motion for summary judgment and denying Genesis' cross-motion for summary judgment. Genesis filed a motion for reconsideration, which was also denied. Genesis timely appeals.
BOTA orders are subject to appellate review under the Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement of Agency Actions, K.S.A. 77-601 et seq. This court's review of statutory interpretation in tax appeal matters is unlimited, and an appellate court applies the same general rules that are applied in other contexts. See Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. Kline, 283 Kan. 64, 77-78, 150 P.3d 892 (2007). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law over which appellate courts have unlimited review. 283 Kan. at 77, 150 P.3d 892.
An administrative agency's determination as to a question of law is not conclusive and, while persuasive, is not binding on the courts. 283 Kan. at 70, 150 P.3d 892. Although BOTA's decisions in its area of expertise are given deference, this court will take corrective steps if BOTA's actions are erroneous as a matter of law. Board of Saline County Comm'rs v. Jensen, 32 Kan. App.2d 730, 733-34, 88 P.3d 242, rev. denied 278 Kan. 843 (2004).
" In re Tax Appeal of Graceland College Center, 40 Kan.App.2d 665, 668, 195 P.3d 245 (2008). Nevertheless, strict construction does not warrant unreasonable construction. 40 Kan.App.2d at 668, 195 P.3d 245.
Genesis first argues BOTA erred in its determination that Genesis failed to prove its purchases were exempt under K.S.A.2008 Supp. 79-3606(n), which exempts property which is consumed in the providing of services for ultimate sale at retail. K.S.A.2008 Supp. 79-3602(dd) defines "`[p]roperty which is consumed'" as "tangible personal property which is essential or necessary to and which is used in the actual process of and consumed, depleted or dissipated within one year in ... (2) the providing of services...." This statute then lists items that qualify as "property which is consumed," including electricity, gas, and water. K.S.A.2008 Supp. 79-3602(dd)(B).
The exemption statute at issue, K.S.A.2008 Supp. 79-3606(n), provides as follows:
"(n) all sales of tangible personal property which is consumed in the production, manufacture, processing, mining, drilling, refining or compounding of tangible personal property, the treating of by-products or wastes derived from any such production process, the providing of services or the irrigation of crops for ultimate sale at retail within or without the state of Kansas; and any purchaser of such property may obtain from the director of taxation and furnish to the supplier an exemption certificate number for tangible personal property for consumption in such production, manufacture, processing, mining, drilling, refining, compounding, treating, irrigation and in providing such services."
In denying Genesis' claim for exemption under this statute, BOTA relied heavily on K.A.R. 92-19-22b(d)(1), which provides:
In response to what appears to be a clearly applicable administrative regulation, Genesis argues that the regulation is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Appeal of Cessna Emps. Credit Union from an Order of the Div. of Taxation
... ... In re Tax Appeals of Genesis Health Clubs, 42 Kan.App.2d 239, 242, 210 P.3d 663 (2009), rev. denied 290 ... ...
-
In re Edmiston Oil Co.
... ... In re Tax Appeals of Genesis Health Clubs, 42 Kan.App.2d 239, 242, 210 P.3d 663 (2009), rev. denied ... ...
-
In re Appeal of Capital Electric Line Builders, Inc.
... ... In re Tax ... Appeals of Genesis Health Clubs, 42 Kan.App.2d 239, 242, ... 210 P.3d 663 (2009) ... ...
-
In re Capital Elec. Line Builders, Inc.
... ... 79-3602(ll)(1). See [ In re Tax Appeals of ] Genesis Health Clubs , 42 Kan. App. 2d [239,] 242[, 210 P.3d 663 (2009)]. "CELB's ... ...